Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WASHINGTON Police officers may enter and search a home without a warrant as long as one occupant consents, even if another resident has previously objected, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in a Los Angeles case.
The 6-3 ruling, triggered by a Los Angeles Police Department arrest in 2009, gives authorities more leeway to search homes without obtaining a warrant, even when there is no emergency.
Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com
Do you have something to hide? Interesting...Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com
WASHINGTON Police officers may enter and search a home without a warrant as long as one occupant consents, even if another resident has previously objected, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in a Los Angeles case.
The 6-3 ruling, triggered by a Los Angeles Police Department arrest in 2009, gives authorities more leeway to search homes without obtaining a warrant, even when there is no emergency.
Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com
I'd blame it on being Commiefornia, but this is the Federal Supreme Snort of the United Crack Federation.
You loved Bush for signing the PATRIOT Act. Why do you have a problem with this?
Do you have something to hide? Interesting...Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com
WASHINGTON — Police officers may enter and search a home without a warrant as long as one occupant consents, even if another resident has previously objected, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in a Los Angeles case.
The 6-3 ruling, triggered by a Los Angeles Police Department arrest in 2009, gives authorities more leeway to search homes without obtaining a warrant, even when there is no emergency.
Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com
I'd blame it on being Commiefornia, but this is the Federal Supreme Snort of the United Crack Federation.
You loved Bush for signing the PATRIOT Act. Why do you have a problem with this?
You start out with ridiculous Teabagger tripe about "Commiefornia", as if you have any idea what Communism is, and then tell someone to drop the "partisan shit"? That's funny.You loved Bush for signing the PATRIOT Act. Why do you have a problem with this?
No I didn't. And the Supreme Snort usurping Florida's State powers to select Bush was one of the most tragic blows to the Tenth Amendment.
Also, seeing that Mccain wants to invade Ukraine, I still stand by my vote for Obama in 2008.
Take your partisan shit elsewhere.
Share? They normally just help themselves. I might be sleeping and it would be rude to wake me.Do you share your private information with criminals and thugs?
But seriously, when are all the 140m gun pussies going to use their second amendment rights to defend any other American rights that have been taken away?
Trial by jury has already been suspended. When does your revolution begin?But seriously, when are all the 140m gun pussies going to use their second amendment rights to defend any other American rights that have been taken away?
Armed revolution is not justified unless:
1) Trial by Jury has been abolished/suspended/usurped.
No President/Governor/Executive can imprison an acquitted man. No Judge can overturn an acquittal, and no Legislative Body can pass a Bill of Attainder to override a decision by a Jury.
So long as Trial by Jury remains, the People only have THEMSELVES to blame for tyrannical abusing themselves, because only THE PEOPLE, you peers, can punish you.
2) Confiscation of Firearms.
The moment the People lose their firearms, then they will be unable to resist the usurpation of Trial by Jury.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Now let's bear in mind that the Obamacare penalty is immune to review by a Jury of your Peers, because the Supreme Snort declared it a tax --- a tax that shall only be paid when you violate the law --- also known as a penalty.
If there is an owner, the owner should have to consent.
If its a rental, any tenant on the lease can consent.
No brainer ruling, if they have permission, they have permission.
The courts like the cops. Either hide your shit well or love alone. You've been warned eh?No brainer ruling, if they have permission, they have permission.
I disagree, they could have done the search pursuant to the arrest, but once they left, a warrant should have been obtained. If it took an hour to get back I'd say there was no concern for evidence being destroyed. The courts have been consistently widening the interpretations of the bill of rights, giving the government more power, it needs to stop.
Trial by jury has already been suspended. When does your revolution begin?But seriously, when are all the 140m gun pussies going to use their second amendment rights to defend any other American rights that have been taken away?
Armed revolution is not justified unless:
1) Trial by Jury has been abolished/suspended/usurped.
No President/Governor/Executive can imprison an acquitted man. No Judge can overturn an acquittal, and no Legislative Body can pass a Bill of Attainder to override a decision by a Jury.
So long as Trial by Jury remains, the People only have THEMSELVES to blame for tyrannical abusing themselves, because only THE PEOPLE, you peers, can punish you.
2) Confiscation of Firearms.
The moment the People lose their firearms, then they will be unable to resist the usurpation of Trial by Jury.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Now let's bear in mind that the Obamacare penalty is immune to review by a Jury of your Peers, because the Supreme Snort declared it a tax --- a tax that shall only be paid when you violate the law --- also known as a penalty.
American drone deaths highlight controversy - U.S. News
Trial by jury has already been suspended. When does your revolution begin?But seriously, when are all the 140m gun pussies going to use their second amendment rights to defend any other American rights that have been taken away?
Armed revolution is not justified unless:
1) Trial by Jury has been abolished/suspended/usurped.
No President/Governor/Executive can imprison an acquitted man. No Judge can overturn an acquittal, and no Legislative Body can pass a Bill of Attainder to override a decision by a Jury.
So long as Trial by Jury remains, the People only have THEMSELVES to blame for tyrannical abusing themselves, because only THE PEOPLE, you peers, can punish you.
2) Confiscation of Firearms.
The moment the People lose their firearms, then they will be unable to resist the usurpation of Trial by Jury.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Now let's bear in mind that the Obamacare penalty is immune to review by a Jury of your Peers, because the Supreme Snort declared it a tax --- a tax that shall only be paid when you violate the law --- also known as a penalty.
American drone deaths highlight controversy - U.S. News
The police now have MRAP's, Body Armor, robots, tear gas, drones & air support that us civilians are not allowed to have. In Ferguson you saw how useless guns & Molotov cocktails were against police. Suicide bombers & large neighborhood destroying IEDs are the best defense civilians have left against these police state jackbooted thugs.But seriously, when are all the 140m gun pussies going to use their second amendment rights to defend any other American rights that have been taken away?
Armed revolution is not justified unless:
1) Trial by Jury has been abolished/suspended/usurped.
No President/Governor/Executive can imprison an acquitted man. No Judge can overturn an acquittal, and no Legislative Body can pass a Bill of Attainder to override a decision by a Jury.
So long as Trial by Jury remains, the People only have THEMSELVES to blame for tyrannical abusing themselves, because only THE PEOPLE, you peers, can punish you.
2) Confiscation of Firearms.
The moment the People lose their firearms, then they will be unable to resist the usurpation of Trial by Jury.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Now let's bear in mind that the Obamacare penalty is immune to review by a Jury of your Peers, because the Supreme Snort declared it a tax --- a tax that shall only be paid when you violate the law --- also known as a penalty.
If the Progressives continue this trend of circumventing Trial by Jury for those who do not comply with their 2,000 page laws, then there will soon be justification for Patriots to Restore the Rule of Law against the usurpers of the Republic.
The police now have MRAP's, Body Armor, robots, tear gas, drones & air support that us civilians are not allowed to have. In Ferguson you saw how useless guns & Molotov cocktails were against police. Suicide bombers & large neighborhood destroying IEDs are the best defense civilians have left against these police state jackbooted thugs.
Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com
WASHINGTON Police officers may enter and search a home without a warrant as long as one occupant consents, even if another resident has previously objected, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in a Los Angeles case.
The 6-3 ruling, triggered by a Los Angeles Police Department arrest in 2009, gives authorities more leeway to search homes without obtaining a warrant, even when there is no emergency.
Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com
I'd blame it on being Commiefornia, but this is the Federal Supreme Snort of the United Crack Federation.
