Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
If you own a house, you buy fire insurance against that house because you stand to lose money if it burns down.
If the house of someone across town burns down, you don't suffer a financial loss. This means you do not have an "insurable interest" in that stranger's house.
You cannot buy fire insurance against a stranger's house because of the insurable interest requirement.
The reason you cannot buy insurance against a stranger's house is pretty obvious. There would be a shitload of arsons. A guy could buy insurance against a stranger's house, make a single premium payment, and then torch that stranger's house to the ground and collect the insurance.
So not all regulations are bad, eh? Some save lives and money.
But imagine if you could buy fire insurance against a stranger's house. Imagine if everyone could.
A $200,000 house could have ten policies against it by strangers. Now if the house burns down, the insurance company isn't out $200,000. It is out $2 million!!!
And that is the problem with CDS. They do not have an insurable interest requirement. They are totally unregulated.
A person could bet against your mortgage burning down. Not kidding.
Now think about that.
If you are an arsonist, what's a sure way to guarantee a bunch of mortgages are going to burn to the ground?
You lend money to people you know can't possibly make the payments. Then you build a CDO out of those mortgages. Then you build a synthetic CDO on top of that toxic CDO.
But since there isn't even an insurable interest requirement for CDS, you can go out and find toxic mortgages which you didn't even make, and pack them into your synthetic CDO!
Then you sell the tranches for that synthetic CDO to some mushroom investors who you don't tell you built this whole firetrap. They have no idea you are on the other side of the bet, because you used Goldman Sachs as your cutout.
Then you throw the match and collect the insurance.
That's ABACUS 2007 AC-1.
Now tell me those fuckers don't belong in prison.
A person could bet against your mortgage burning down. Not kidding.
If I could do that and then stop you from paying your mortgage, I'd be rich!!!
You lend money to people you know can't possibly make the payments. Then you build a CDO out of those mortgages. Then you build a synthetic CDO on top of that toxic CDO.
Did Goldman make the original loans? Did Goldman build a CDO out of the original loans?
As far as I know, they only built the synthetic CDO.
But since there isn't even an insurable interest requirement for CDS, you can go out and find toxic mortgages which you didn't even make, and pack them into your synthetic CDO!
That's a relief. Your scary hypothetical was just a hypothetical.
Then you sell the tranches for that synthetic CDO to some mushroom investors who you don't tell you built this whole firetrap. They have no idea you are on the other side of the bet, because you used Goldman Sachs as your cutout.
So Goldman sold both sides of this stuff and did not bet against their clients?
So many changing claims. It's difficult to keep track.
Then you throw the match and collect the insurance.
Paulson made all those shaky borrowers default?
He's one bad mother........I think I found his picture.
That's ABACUS 2007 AC-1.
Yeah, after subtracting all your errors, that's ABACUS 2007 AC-1.