progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 62,341
- 38,097
- 2,615
At the 1:22 mark on the video...Colin Noir is a lawyer...
He doesn't sound very optimistic about it.
I expect him to be in violation of this law.
Could be, and they may hang him on that since they are likely going to fail on the murder charges.
Seems pretty clear to me that he was in violation of that law. Not much wiggle room there. "Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor."
They're going to try to get him on the pre-meditated thing, which I believe is likely true, but will be extremely difficult for the prosecutors to actually prove. Personally, I don't see the murder charges sticking.
I don't see how they get Pre-meditated since in each case he was the one being attacked by the mob.....the reporter was an eye witness to the first provocation, and we have video of the mob attacking him while he was on the ground.
Well he went out of his way to defend a car dealership that he had no connection with. And it can at least be debated how much of a threat the first guy was. Initial claims were that he threw a Molotov cocktail, but I don't think that was the case.
I would argue that he was looking for a fight. He wanted an excuse to use deadly force in self-defense. Kind of like the Florida shooter at the convenient store.
But, even though I believe that may very well be true, I don't think it can be proven. So I think they'll try that, but I don't expect it to stick.
You think he was the one looking for a fight? Not the guy who kept coming at him on multiple videos, the guy who kept aggressing towards armed people? And then chased him?
You think the kid was the one who was there looking to start trouble?
Seriously...… wtf is wrong with you?
It's not an either/or.
The ones who got shot were definitely looking for a fight. No question about that.
I've done security work for a large part of my life, nearly all of it if you count the military...… is a bouncer in a nighclub "looking for a fight"? Yes.
Is he ready willing and able to deal with one? Yes.
Is he there to "instigate" one? No.
There is a fundamental difference here between the rioters who showed up intending to do damage and cause carnage, and the folks who showed up ready and willing to prevent them from doing so.
Does the bouncer of the night club travel across state lines to defend a club he has no connection with just for fun?
How does that distinction make a difference?
He shows up heavily armed in a different state to defend a car lot he has no connection to. Looks like an excuse to me. That's my opinion.
excuse to do what??/
two of the guys he shot came from further away,,,
and he had a single gun,,thats not heavily armed in my book
Excuse to shoot someone.
I'm not talking about victims 2 and 3. Just the first one.
I didn't ask for your personal definition of heavily armed.
the first one attacked him and tried to take his gun,,,
your definition sucks and is highly inaccurate,,,
What's the accurate definition of "highly armed"? Make sure you site your source.
multiple guns with large amounts of extra ammo,,,not to mention a few knives and body armor,,,
a single gun doesnt even come close,,,
I asked you to site your source.
If you don't have a source, then it's subjective. Therefore you can't say my subjective definition is inaccurate if there is no set definition.
the two have nothing to do with each other,,,
a single gun with a standard capacity magazine is not heavily armed,,, it could be if youre a fucking pussy but not if your a man,,
are you saying they lied about his employment???
Still waiting on you to site your source about the definition of "highly armed".
beings that youre a fucking pussy you wouldnt understand,,,
is that your mom calling with more cookies and milk,,,
Still no link.
So maybe now you understand that it's subjective. There's no set definition. Therefore you can't say that my definition is inaccurate and it's stupid to get hung up on definitions that don't actually exist.
Good. You're all caught up now.
nothing subjective about it,,,you show up to do battle with a single gun with a single standard capacity mag you would be laughed back home to get your cookies and milk,,,