RollingThunder
Gold Member
- Mar 22, 2010
- 4,818
- 525
- 155
You stand around mewling about how your nonsensical pseudo-science "remains unchallenged" but you seem to be unable to point out/cite some specific example of your nonsense that wasn't immediately debunked.
None of the claims I have made have been debunked. There is no need to point to any specific example that wasn't debunked because none have been debunked.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.....classic......
So you actually can't point to (with a link) or reiterate any claims you made that weren't debunked, but in your fantasy world, "there is no need to point to any specific example" because, in that safe little fantasy world, you're always right. LOLOLOLOLOL....such a retard!!!
I challenged you in post #107 of this thread and now 14 posts later you still haven't been able to answer the challenge. Pathetic.
"Point to something you've posted that you imagine somehow refutes any part of mainstream climate science and I'll point out where it was debunked. Or I'll debunk it anew with actual scientific evidence."
I challenged you to make a straightforward claim of something that refutes modern climate science, not to masturbate over strawman suppositions about my state of knowledge of physics. Put up or shut up.LOLOL. You apparently live in another universe with very different "laws of physics". The only thing 'supporting' your idiotic nonsense is your own insanity and ignorance of actual science.
Is it your claim that neither the earth nor the atmosphere emit an EM field? Is it your claim that one or both of those fields are not subject to the laws of physics that govern the transfer of energy via EM fields? Is it your claim that one or both of those fields are not emitted in terms of vectors? Is it your claim that the vectors emitted by one or both of those fields are not subject to the laws of physics that govern the behavior of vectors?
For example, are you making the claim that energy can flow from two EM fields in two directions along any given vector?
No, you scraped it off of some dingbat denier cult blog written by someone as ignorant as you are.No, wired&bent, I am suggesting that you are a clueless dufus whose knowledge of science and physics is minimal and usually mistaken. Your "whole topic" is such out-in-the-ozone pseudo-science that no real scientists have even heard of it, let alone bothered to refute it. Real scientists can't be bothered to refute the braindead claims put out by the Flat Earth Society either but that doesn't mean the flat-earthers are right by default, it just means that, like you, they are too crazy to bother with.
Sorry guy, but I didn't invent my position.
Your position is based on your ignorance, gullibility, arrogance, paranoia, and general stupidity. As well as a generous helping of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.My position is based on very well known physical laws and long known knowledge regarding vector physics.
Your position is a misinterpretation and misrepresentation of the accepted texts. The entire matter is way over your head but you lack the intellectual ability to comprehend your own limitations or appreciate the extent of your ignorance.My position has been stated in long known and accepted texts on subjects ranging from engineering to astrophysics. That it is entirely over your head is made blatantly obvious by your complete inability to point to any specific error on my part.