Thank God for our RIGHT to keep and bear arms

[Rexx Taylor]

Okay, well, we don't want to spam Mr. Rottweiler's thread. Funny stuff though! Lol.

and Hillarys arm would De-Bowel me if she lost her temper and whacked me in the stomache.

 

[2aguy]

Do bears S**t in the woods....and do transgender bears have a right to **** there too?

 

[Rexx Taylor]

Do bears S**t in the woods....and do transgender bears have a right to **** there too?

i have always wondered if gay bears had the right to use the bathroom of their choice in the wods

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes child pornography from 1st Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 2nd Amendment guys here are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT.

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes fully automatic weapons from 2nd Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 1st Amendment libtards are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT. If the founders couldn't possibly have seen the advancement in weapons technology and never meant for the Constitution to protect that, then they also couldn't possibly have seen the internet, cell phones, Facebook, Twitter, texts, etc. which can spread disinformation and misinformation around the globe in milliseconds.

Oops....

The reason automatic weapons can be restricted is that the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to rule so.

When did the Supreme Court ever rule on automatic weapons?

 

[P@triot]

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes child pornography from 1st Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 2nd Amendment guys here are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT.

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes fully automatic weapons from 2nd Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 1st Amendment libtards are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT. If the founders couldn't possibly have seen the advancement in weapons technology and never meant for the Constitution to protect that, then they also couldn't possibly have seen the internet, cell phones, Facebook, Twitter, texts, etc. which can spread disinformation and misinformation around the globe in milliseconds.

Oops....

The reason automatic weapons can be restricted is that the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to rule so.

When did the Supreme Court ever rule on automatic weapons?

The liberals have used so many tools and tactics to usurp the will of the people and the U.S. Constitution that they can't even remember which one they used which time.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The perpetrator was armed with a knife. This woman would have been dead if not for her 2nd Amendment right. Of course, the left have been waging a disgusting war on women for decades so they wouldn't have cared. In fact, I suspect that's why they want to disarm everyone. More female victims for them. Demand men have access to women's locker rooms, showers, and rest rooms and then disarm them.

Woman leaves would-be attacker bloody and wounded

I like your post.

But a clarification, you do realize that we are FREE PEOPLE and the 2A EMPHASIZES our ABSOLUTE RIGHT to bear arms. The right is protected by the Constitution and the Ninth Amendment.

Otherwise the dingleberries will retort the the 2A only applies to militias.

I'm not sure where you are getting out of my post that we don't have an absolute right to bear arms. We do and no where do I state otherwise. Furthermore, as I've pointed out to libtards many times, it does not say "muskets" or "hand guns" - as in, our absolute right goes far beyond just a gun. It is limitless in the type of weapon we can own. Limitless.

Freedom of the press - in the Constitution - doesn't exclude child pornography, does it?

What does the "press" have to do with child pornography? The press talks about the subject when it comes up from time to time.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes child pornography from 1st Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 2nd Amendment guys here are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT.

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes fully automatic weapons from 2nd Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 1st Amendment libtards are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT. If the founders couldn't possibly have seen the advancement in weapons technology and never meant for the Constitution to protect that, then they also couldn't possibly have seen the internet, cell phones, Facebook, Twitter, texts, etc. which can spread disinformation and misinformation around the globe in milliseconds.

Oops....

The reason automatic weapons can be restricted is that the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to rule so.

When did the Supreme Court ever rule on automatic weapons?

The liberals have used so many tools and tactics to usurp the will of the people and the U.S. Constitution that they can't even remember which one they used which time.

What they don't understand is that the US Constitution does not tell us what we can do, it tells us what government can't do.

 

[P@triot]

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes child pornography from 1st Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 2nd Amendment guys here are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT.

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes fully automatic weapons from 2nd Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 1st Amendment libtards are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT. If the founders couldn't possibly have seen the advancement in weapons technology and never meant for the Constitution to protect that, then they also couldn't possibly have seen the internet, cell phones, Facebook, Twitter, texts, etc. which can spread disinformation and misinformation around the globe in milliseconds.

Oops....

The reason automatic weapons can be restricted is that the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to rule so.

When did the Supreme Court ever rule on automatic weapons?

The liberals have used so many tools and tactics to usurp the will of the people and the U.S. Constitution that they can't even remember which one they used which time.

What they don't understand is that the US Constitution does not tell us what we can do, it tells us what government can't do.

Oh don't kid yourself - they understand. But they can't impose their views on the rest of society if they obey the U.S. Constitution. So they pretend like it doesn't matter, or they pretend like they don't understand what it says, or they pretend like 9 unelected individuals were "magically" granted powers in invisible ink on the document to decide what the document means, etc.

They come up with every absurd and desperate thing they can think of for why you don't have the rights that they don't want you to have.

 

[Contumacious]

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes child pornography from 1st Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 2nd Amendment guys here are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT.

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes fully automatic weapons from 2nd Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 1st Amendment libtards are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT. If the founders couldn't possibly have seen the advancement in weapons technology and never meant for the Constitution to protect that, then they also couldn't possibly have seen the internet, cell phones, Facebook, Twitter, texts, etc. which can spread disinformation and misinformation around the globe in milliseconds.

Oops....

The reason automatic weapons can be restricted is that the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to rule so.

When did the Supreme Court ever rule on automatic weapons?

The liberals have used so many tools and tactics to usurp the will of the people and the U.S. Constitution that they can't even remember which one they used which time.

What they don't understand is that the US Constitution does not tell us what we can do, it tells us what government can't do.

EXACTLY.


.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Oh don't kid yourself - they understand. But they can't impose their views on the rest of society if they obey the U.S. Constitution. So they pretend like it doesn't matter, or they pretend like they don't understand what it says, or they pretend like 9 unelected individuals were "magically" granted powers in invisible ink on the document to decide what the document means, etc.

They come up with every absurd and desperate thing they can think of for why you don't have the rights that they don't want you to have.

I think the best one they so frequently use is that the US Constitution is outdated, and merely for the people of it's time.

Second place is that some of the authors were slave owners, therefore that discredits any of their opinions, ideas, or morals.

But oh how they bask in the glory of our Constitution when the judges rule that Gay Marriage or Commie Care is protected.

 

[candycorn]

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes child pornography from 1st Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 2nd Amendment guys here are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT.

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes fully automatic weapons from 2nd Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 1st Amendment libtards are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT. If the founders couldn't possibly have seen the advancement in weapons technology and never meant for the Constitution to protect that, then they also couldn't possibly have seen the internet, cell phones, Facebook, Twitter, texts, etc. which can spread disinformation and misinformation around the globe in milliseconds.

Oops....

So you agree that laws against child pornography are unconstitutional. lol

You seem desperate for that to be the case. Not entirely sure why. But no - freedom of speech and freedom of press are about WORDS. Photography didn't even exist back when the U.S. Constitution was written (whereas guns, cannons, etc. did).

You're really looking ridiculous here grasping this desperately at straws. Are you sure you don't want to try another approach?

That was weak and pathetic even for you.

 

[P@triot]

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes child pornography from 1st Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 2nd Amendment guys here are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT.

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes fully automatic weapons from 2nd Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 1st Amendment libtards are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT. If the founders couldn't possibly have seen the advancement in weapons technology and never meant for the Constitution to protect that, then they also couldn't possibly have seen the internet, cell phones, Facebook, Twitter, texts, etc. which can spread disinformation and misinformation around the globe in milliseconds.

Oops....

So you agree that laws against child pornography are unconstitutional. lol

You seem desperate for that to be the case. Not entirely sure why. But no - freedom of speech and freedom of press are about WORDS. Photography didn't even exist back when the U.S. Constitution was written (whereas guns, cannons, etc. did).

You're really looking ridiculous here grasping this desperately at straws. Are you sure you don't want to try another approach?

That was weak and pathetic even for you.

Right? I thought the exact same thing about NYCarbineers really sad and desperate grasping at straws. Glad you saw it the same way!

 

[Rustic]

2016 Real Time Death Statistics in America

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'm not sure where you are getting out of my post that we don't have an absolute right to bear arms. We do and no where do I state otherwise. Furthermore, as I've pointed out to libtards many times, it does not say "muskets" or "hand guns" - as in, our absolute right goes far beyond just a gun. It is limitless in the type of weapon we can own. Limitless.

Freedom of the press - in the Constitution - doesn't exclude child pornography, does it?

Good grief. This is a sure sign of desperation. Lol.

Rottweiler says the 2nd Amendment is 'limitless'. If he's right, isn't the 1st Amendment also 'limitless'?

She fled the interview. Big surprise.

Well, I had no idea this was an interview. In order for me to grant you an interview, I want to get paid, of course.

Are you really this dense or are you pretending to be because being rational would fuck with your agenda?

 

[candycorn]

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes child pornography from 1st Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 2nd Amendment guys here are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT.

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes fully automatic weapons from 2nd Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 1st Amendment libtards are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT. If the founders couldn't possibly have seen the advancement in weapons technology and never meant for the Constitution to protect that, then they also couldn't possibly have seen the internet, cell phones, Facebook, Twitter, texts, etc. which can spread disinformation and misinformation around the globe in milliseconds.

Oops....

So you agree that laws against child pornography are unconstitutional. lol

You seem desperate for that to be the case. Not entirely sure why. But no - freedom of speech and freedom of press are about WORDS. Photography didn't even exist back when the U.S. Constitution was written (whereas guns, cannons, etc. did).

You're really looking ridiculous here grasping this desperately at straws. Are you sure you don't want to try another approach?

That was weak and pathetic even for you.

Right? I thought the exact same thing about NYCarbineers really sad and desperate grasping at straws. Glad you saw it the same way!

Freedom of the press covers images and they are limited.
The right to bear arms can be limited using the same jurisprudence.

Fact.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes child pornography from 1st Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 2nd Amendment guys here are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT.

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes fully automatic weapons from 2nd Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 1st Amendment libtards are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT. If the founders couldn't possibly have seen the advancement in weapons technology and never meant for the Constitution to protect that, then they also couldn't possibly have seen the internet, cell phones, Facebook, Twitter, texts, etc. which can spread disinformation and misinformation around the globe in milliseconds.

Oops....

So you agree that laws against child pornography are unconstitutional. lol

You seem desperate for that to be the case. Not entirely sure why. But no - freedom of speech and freedom of press are about WORDS. Photography didn't even exist back when the U.S. Constitution was written (whereas guns, cannons, etc. did).

You're really looking ridiculous here grasping this desperately at straws. Are you sure you don't want to try another approach?

That was weak and pathetic even for you.

Right? I thought the exact same thing about NYCarbineers really sad and desperate grasping at straws. Glad you saw it the same way!

Have you posted where the 1st Amendment protection of freedom of the press allows for the exceptions related to child pornography?

Or are you now willing to concede that the 2nd Amendment allows for exceptions?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes child pornography from 1st Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 2nd Amendment guys here are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT.

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes fully automatic weapons from 2nd Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 1st Amendment libtards are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT. If the founders couldn't possibly have seen the advancement in weapons technology and never meant for the Constitution to protect that, then they also couldn't possibly have seen the internet, cell phones, Facebook, Twitter, texts, etc. which can spread disinformation and misinformation around the globe in milliseconds.

Oops....

So you agree that laws against child pornography are unconstitutional. lol

You seem desperate for that to be the case. Not entirely sure why. But no - freedom of speech and freedom of press are about WORDS. Photography didn't even exist back when the U.S. Constitution was written (whereas guns, cannons, etc. did).

You're really looking ridiculous here grasping this desperately at straws. Are you sure you don't want to try another approach?

That was weak and pathetic even for you.

Right? I thought the exact same thing about NYCarbineers really sad and desperate grasping at straws. Glad you saw it the same way!

Prove that child pornography is not protected by the 1st amendment, using only the wording of the 1st amendment.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes child pornography from 1st Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 2nd Amendment guys here are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT.

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes fully automatic weapons from 2nd Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 1st Amendment libtards are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT. If the founders couldn't possibly have seen the advancement in weapons technology and never meant for the Constitution to protect that, then they also couldn't possibly have seen the internet, cell phones, Facebook, Twitter, texts, etc. which can spread disinformation and misinformation around the globe in milliseconds.

Oops....

The reason automatic weapons can be restricted is that the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to rule so.

When did the Supreme Court ever rule on automatic weapons?

The liberals have used so many tools and tactics to usurp the will of the people and the U.S. Constitution that they can't even remember which one they used which time.

What they don't understand is that the US Constitution does not tell us what we can do, it tells us what government can't do.

If you believe that a 10 year old should be able to go buy a machine gun, no questions asked,

then let's hear that argument.

 

[Rustic]

Find the text of the Constitution that excludes fully automatic weapons from 2nd Amendment protection.

Keep in mind, the 1st Amendment libtards are making the SAME EXACT ARGUMENT. If the founders couldn't possibly have seen the advancement in weapons technology and never meant for the Constitution to protect that, then they also couldn't possibly have seen the internet, cell phones, Facebook, Twitter, texts, etc. which can spread disinformation and misinformation around the globe in milliseconds.

Oops....

The reason automatic weapons can be restricted is that the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to rule so.

When did the Supreme Court ever rule on automatic weapons?

The liberals have used so many tools and tactics to usurp the will of the people and the U.S. Constitution that they can't even remember which one they used which time.

What they don't understand is that the US Constitution does not tell us what we can do, it tells us what government can't do.

If you believe that a 10 year old should be able to go buy a machine gun, no questions asked,

then let's hear that argument.

 

[Rustic]