Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh yes, those weapons mostly supplied by Americans... Thanks Yanks, we owe you one.
Erm, they do already, don't you read M14 shooter's posts, how rude of you. So then, how many innocent people have BLM killed?
Good point and answer to those who think AR-15s — or other semi-automatic weapons with 30-bullet clips and body armor — somehow are really appropriate for home defense.
I feel the OP writer made it clear that he, like many right wingers, does not mainly think about the AR-15 as a weapon for home defense, but as a good weapon to wage some kind of necessary civil war against imagined political enemies — to “keep the democrats from burning, looting and killing when they try to gain power.”
Everyone knows it is the right that is most heavily armed in this country, that looters are usually mostly unorganized criminals or vandals out to “shop for free.” Of course everyone has the right to defend life and property and their own homes when necessary. But some gun nuts now seek to become … vigilantes and political activists.
The result of such fantasies accompanied by widespread arming with assault-like weapons not only is that these weapons are ever more frequently used by nutters to kill children in schools, but they are also used by outright racists against minorities, e.g. in Churches and shopping centers. Both have special and horrifying emotional resonance. The conscious effort of some of these lunatics is to be “vanguard warriors,” to start a civil war, or a “Helter Skelter” race war. THAT is especially dangerous and disastrous to our multi-ethnic society & Republic.
Those on the right who call AR-15s a weapon “to fight Democrats” are treading on dangerous ground. It is unfortunate but guns — the AR-15 serving as a symbol — are becoming subliminal tools for intimidation and terror in our life and politics.
That doesn’t mean semi-auto weapons or the AR-15 should or can be “banned.” I can understand those who call for this after terror attacks like the recent ones in Buffalo and Uvalde, but I don’t think people or politicians who speak this way are being realistic — not in today’s U.S.A. anyway.
But there are a host of regulations, from strict registration to banning large clips, to insisting on waiting periods, to serious background checks (etc.), that are eminently reasonable and supportable under a strict originalist interpretation of the 2nd Amendment. Many would even be supported by police and responsible Republicans and private gun owners.
What is NOT appropriate is irresponsible talk about needing assault weapons to defeat political (or racial) opponents.
These pissant misfits are playing fantasy games.. pretend masculinity. A shotgun works for home security even loaded with bird shot.
No shit Sherlock. That's a characteristic of a direct gas impingement system weapon. Firing blanks has nothing to do with normal operation.No....I wasn't doing anything wrong.
I was well trained on my weapons.
Fire a few blanks thru them and they become practically worthless.
You have to clean them immediately after a blankfire mission.
Hey, I’m not a lawyer or Constitutional scholar. Neither are you, I suspect. We’re not on the Supreme Court either. I wasn’t even referring to today’s Supreme Court. The 2nd Amendment has been “incorporated” to apply to states and there can be state legislation, of course, but I’m not here advocating any specific state or federal laws — that’s for state legislators and politicians.OK.... why do you think the court will rule "strict registration" and "banning large clips" and "waiting periods" and "serious background checks" do not infringe on the right to keep and bear arms?
These are not in common use for the traditionally legal uses of a firearm - and thus, are not "bearable arms".
Apples/oranges.
The states and the federal government have the power to regulate the militia how they want.
Except, of course, for regulations that violate the 2nd Amendment.
"All bearable arms". What you -call- them doesn't matter.
That is not a toy.Nice little toy there.
Firing blanks is something that you have to do if you're using MILES gear.No shit Sherlock. That's a characteristic of a direct gas impingement system weapon. Firing blanks has nothing to do with normal operation.
Compared to some of the ones I've fired...it is.That is not a toy.
How many people did Timothy McVeigh wax with that truckbomb?Yeah....you really are a dumb ass......
The las vegas shooter, firing from a concealed, fortified, elevate position, into a tightly packed concert area....not like this, but packed in the center of the floor.........with total surprise....
Killed 60 people out of 22,000
So no, not hundreds dead, not even in that situation......you dumb ass.....
The muslim terrorist in Nice, France, with a rental truck, no police scrutiny, no background check, in 5 minutes of driving.....murdered 86 people and injured 450 others....
You idiots don't understand the issues......you are filled with fear, ignorance and stupidity....
Nearly all arenas, events & government buildings have huge concrete barricades preventing truck terrorist from driving over crowds & bombing buildings. You cant get anything on a jet plane anymore.How many people did Timothy McVeigh wax with that truckbomb?
With the kind of explosives they have these days...you'd have to keep everything at least a football field length away...and it will still shatter windows from over a mile away.Nearly all arenas, events & government buildings have huge concrete barricades preventing truck terrorist from driving over crowds & bombing buildings. You cant get anything on a jet plane anymore.
Correct.The same way “bearing” stinger anti-aircraft missiles and bazookas and suitcase-sized nuclear arms were outlawed — none of which were available in the 18th century.
Yet the Brother mowed over Dozens of White Folk in a parade recentlyEvery event in city streets like that I've been to since 9/11 have barricades preventing terrorist from driving over people.
Exactly.Hey, I’m not a lawyer or Constitutional scholar. Neither are you, I suspect. We’re not on the Supreme Court either. I wasn’t even referring to today’s Supreme Court. The 2nd Amendment has been “incorporated” to apply to states and there can be state legislation, of course, but I’m not here advocating any specific state or federal laws — that’s for state legislators and politicians.
I am just — as a long-time rifle and pistol owner with a carry license — giving my view (a responsible view I think) on a variety of gun-related matters that most people seem to see in extreme terms, or as offering “no middle ground.”
The OP is clearly operating under the idiotic fantasy that he’s going to fill his front yard with dozens of corpses of this imaginary ‘mob.’These pissant misfits are playing fantasy games.. pretend masculinity. A shotgun works for home security even loaded with bird shot.
