The Benghazi Talking Points. True screen shots. Not Media Matters edited lie.

[tinydancer]

It appears truth consistently eludes liberals at every turn. There is a thread up on this board based on an edited lie at Media Matters. Here are the true screen shots directly from the Weekly Standard article.

Note how Version 1 includes the potential of an AQ attack.

Check out the changes in Version 2.

And then the total fabrication by the White House in Version 3. What a tangled web we weave, when we practice to deceive.

Busted. Because the White House and the Administration blatantly formatted this version by removing all references to AQ.

From the article and please it's worth the read:

There is little information about what happened at that meeting of the Deputies Committee.

But according to two officials with knowledge of the process, Mike Morrell, deputy director of the CIA, made broad changes to the draft afterwards.

Morrell cut all or parts of four paragraphs of the six-paragraph talking points—148 of its 248 words (see Version 2 above).

Gone were the reference to “Islamic extremists,” the reminders of agency warnings about al Qaeda in Libya, the reference to “jihadists” in Cairo, the mention of possible surveillance of the facility in Benghazi, and the report of five previous attacks on foreign interests.

What remained—and would be included in the final version of the talking points—was mostly boilerplate about ongoing investigations and working with the Libyan government, together with bland language suggesting that the “violent demonstrations”—no longer “attacks”—were spontaneous responses to protests in Egypt and may have included generic “extremists” (see Version 3 above).

The Benghazi Talking Points | The Weekly Standard

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

The truth in this case is their enemy. They are going to fight it at every turn.

 

[tinydancer]

The truth in this case is their enemy. They are going to fight it at every turn.

How true. It never ceases to amaze me how the left wing propagandists will now distort the truth and/or blatantly lie by editing.

How many times have we seen this? From Zimmerman to Benghazi the left wingers will do anything possible to promote their agenda.

And they don't care a lick how many times they lie.

 

[jwoodie]

The libtards won't touch this post with a ten foot pole.

 

[tjvh]

Liberals don't have a problem with elected liberal Democrats lying to the American people, they view lies as unimportant and a necessary evil if those lies allow them to advance their twisted ideology.

 

[tinydancer]

The libtards won't touch this post with a ten foot pole.

Odds are they'll try to bury the thread and drive the front page with NRA threads.



It's what they do.

 

[g5000]

How many more Benghazi topics you going to start, tinydancer? Every time you get your ass handed to you, you run off and start another one, spamming the board.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Liberal philosophy, destroy the truth, defend the lie.

 

[Sallow]

Liberal philosophy, destroy the truth, defend the lie.

What lie?

Seriously..feel free.

The thing they got wrong was that this particular attack was not inspired by the internet film. However, others were.

Here's the other truth. You folks are completely and totally unconcerned with each and every American killed by the actions of the last administration.

 

[g5000]

Talking points:

"Obama watched as the Ambassador died".

"Seven hour battle at the consulate".

"Stand down order".

"No rescue was sent".

"The three men testifying are Benghazi survivors".


Yep. The people who manufactured this bullshit have integrity out the wazoo! They are righteous enough to sit in judgment of others.

Remember, kids. It isn't about princples and honesty. It is about winning at all costs. If you have to make up lies to win, go for it.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Liberal philosophy, destroy the truth, defend the lie.

What lie?

Seriously..feel free.

The thing they got wrong was that this particular attack was not inspired by the internet film. However, others were.

Here's the other truth. You folks are completely and totally unconcerned with each and every American killed by the actions of the last administration.

How could you get something like that wrong when you had real time video coverage and a history of threats? You folks can't stop going back to BOOOSH as if that's a defense.

Facts will come out and they will show that men were ordered to stand down and the entire event was covered up to protect Obama's rhetoric.


Benghazi Timeline

 

[Caroljo]

Liberals don't have a problem with elected liberal Democrats lying to the American people, they view lies as unimportant and a necessary evil if those lies allow them to advance their twisted ideology.

Just like radical muslims do....it's ok for them to lie out the wazoo as long as it helps their agenda. Liberals are the same way, that's why they defend them so much!

 

[tinydancer]

How many more Benghazi topics you going to start, tinydancer? Every time you get your ass handed to you, you run off and start another one, spamming the board.

Spamming the board? Four threads on Benghazi since 4/30/13? Put down the bong.

This one needed to be started to prove that the Media Matters talking points were a lie.

If you don't like my threads you don't have to post in them.

 

[tinydancer]

Liberal philosophy, destroy the truth, defend the lie.

What lie?

Seriously..feel free.

The thing they got wrong was that this particular attack was not inspired by the internet film. However, others were.

Here's the other truth. You folks are completely and totally unconcerned with each and every American killed by the actions of the last administration.

How could you get something like that wrong when you had real time video coverage and a history of threats? You folks can't stop going back to BOOOSH as if that's a defense.

Facts will come out and they will show that men were ordered to stand down and the entire event was covered up to protect Obama's rhetoric.


Benghazi Timeline

That's an excellent timeline that they put together.

Thanks.

 

[tinydancer]

Liberals don't have a problem with elected liberal Democrats lying to the American people, they view lies as unimportant and a necessary evil if those lies allow them to advance their twisted ideology.

They are true believers in "the end justifies the means".

 

[Vanquish]

Any thread (which is most around here) that starts off with their CONCLUSION rather than stating facts and proving an argument, has NO credibility. How is anyone supposed to trust your facts or conclusion when it's obvious you're biased?

That's not reasoned intellect. It's the emotional spewage of a a sheep.

 

[tinydancer]

Any thread (which is most around here) that starts off with their CONCLUSION rather than stating facts and proving an argument, has NO credibility. How is anyone supposed to trust your facts or conclusion when it's obvious you're biased?

That's not reasoned intellect. It's the emotional spewage of a a sheep.

There's absolutely no argument to be had. Media Matters heavily edited the Weekly Standard's screen shots.

Consequently their whole article was a lie. A blatant unadulterated lie.

There is no debate, no argument, nada. Media Matters article is a lie. Plain and simple.

This is the MM edited version of the screen shots I put up from the Weekly Standard in their entirety in my OP.

We believe based on currently available information that the attacks in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex.

In the final version of the document, that bullet reads:

The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. diplomatic post and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.

Weekly Standard Accidentally Disproves Central Right-Wing Benghazi Claim | Blog | Media Matters for America

And one more time for good measure from my OP:

 

[Vanquish]

Your conclusions based on the edits are what I'm contesting.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Any thread (which is most around here) that starts off with their CONCLUSION rather than stating facts and proving an argument, has NO credibility. How is anyone supposed to trust your facts or conclusion when it's obvious you're biased?

That's not reasoned intellect. It's the emotional spewage of a a sheep.

Anyone who dismisses a thread based off of pure emotion and self proclaimed intellectual superiority, has neither credibility nor intelligence.

So, does it reason to say that you're the one being biased?

 

[yidnar]

Liberals don't have a problem with elected liberal Democrats lying to the American people, they view lies as unimportant and a necessary evil if those lies allow them to advance their twisted ideology.

They are true believers in "the end justifies the means".

just like Islam !!