Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
Poor Crick, projecting his own failuresYou, on the other hand, are just as idiotic as you've always been. Jesus, what a fool.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Poor Crick, projecting his own failuresYou, on the other hand, are just as idiotic as you've always been. Jesus, what a fool.
Is this cult the same massive group of hundreds of thousands of scientists all perfectly conspiring to lie to the world for the last several decades without anyone EVER confessing or actual EVIDENCE of such a conspiracy EVER being found? Wow... those are some smart motherfuckers.
They are mean vile people, now being forced to apologize for hateful comments toward the disabled.That would mean that this interglacial would last over 30,000 years. Cite a single previous example where an interglacial persisted for this long.During the last glacial advance, ice was stacked a MILE over Chicago. You want to figure out a challenge for the human race to overcome, try and figure out how the folks that face that will preserve their society under that level of challenge.
If the next ice age is arriving in 20,000 years...
Your fantastical fiction that you are attempting to attribute to me does not speak well for your integrity....Your idiot strategy of overheating the earth now to stave off an ice age ...
And yet it is you who is trafficking in terms used to describe religious heresy in a discussion of natural science,... demonstrating the low IQ of deniers.
The hairball has no integrity...she has bitterness and anger in copious quantities...and will say anything ......literally anything in an effort to distract people from actually learning the truth about the climate scam.
In Science facts are established by how closely they correspond with reality, who publishes them has no bearing on their reliability.
Your link....."New Scientist" is not a scientific journal and often relies on sensationalizing. Here is an example....
"Darwin Was Wrong"
"New Scientist is not a scientific journal. Although its articles are usually well-written and report quite respectable science, it does have a bad habit of sensationalizing things a little. Often trivial things will be quote mined to produce a fancy cover and headline. The most controversial being the "Darwin Was Wrong" cover.[4] This was criticised by many evolutionary scientists in the blogosphere as being potentially misrepresenting scientific discovery.[5]
In fact the article revealed nothing of the kind,[6] and the supposed breakthrough on the cover was actually a fairly minor point in regards to changing the theories of natural selection — specifically the "tree of life," used by Darwin in developing his theory but now mostly rejected.
Why would any self-respecting magazine do this sort of thing? Firstly, sensationalism sells and most of the media openly admits it.[7] Like any other magazine, New Scientist relies on selling copies in order to remain a profitable business. Secondly, writers never get the chance to write their own headlines; there are specialist staff writers and sub editors for that. Any evolutionary biologist writing for New Scientist would have known that the headline was misleading, and would provoke a backlash from those on the front line of the origins debate, but the headline writers may not have cared."
New Scientist - RationalWiki
Because we currently are IN an ice age, just with the good fortune of being in a temporary interglacial period.Your fantastical fiction that you are attempting to attribute to me does not speak well for your integrity.
You posted a rant about how we needed to be saved from an ice age that isn't anywhere near. My interpretation of that was on the mark.
If you'd like to clarify, by all means do so. Be specific. Why did you bring up ice ages, which have pretty much crap to do with anything now?...
No. You are making things up again. We do not have the power to heat the entire world, though to preserve our population in a glacier advance we would certainly be greatly challenged to keep our populations warm and fed. Cooling is associated with a great reduction in the life carrying capacity of the planet.... You want to overheat the world now to prevent a future ice age...
We have been in an overall cooling tend for 8,000 years. The last inter-glacial lasted 15,000 years, this one one could be longer or shorter.... which is way the hell off in the future -- possibly a hundred thousand years now, thanks to humans...
What is it with you guys declaring everyone who disagrees with you in such hateful disparaging terms? Please work on being more tolerant of opposing viewpoints and focusing on FACTS rather than personality.... -- making you a dangerously deluded ice age cultist. Naturally, non-cultists reject your ice age religion, being that it's nonsensical and profoundly destructive to humanity.
Your fantastical fiction that you are attempting to attribute to me does not speak well for your integrity.
You posted a rant about how we needed to be saved from an ice age that isn't anywhere near. My interpretation of that was on the mark.
Is this cult the same massive group of hundreds of thousands of scientists all perfectly conspiring to lie to the world for the last several decades without anyone EVER confessing or actual EVIDENCE of such a conspiracy EVER being found? Wow... those are some smart motherfuckers.
They are mean vile people, now being forced to apologize for hateful comments toward the disabled.That would mean that this interglacial would last over 30,000 years. Cite a single previous example where an interglacial persisted for this long.During the last glacial advance, ice was stacked a MILE over Chicago. You want to figure out a challenge for the human race to overcome, try and figure out how the folks that face that will preserve their society under that level of challenge.
If the next ice age is arriving in 20,000 years...
Your fantastical fiction that you are attempting to attribute to me does not speak well for your integrity....Your idiot strategy of overheating the earth now to stave off an ice age ...
And yet it is you who is trafficking in terms used to describe religious heresy in a discussion of natural science,... demonstrating the low IQ of deniers.
The hairball has no integrity...she has bitterness and anger in copious quantities...and will say anything ......literally anything in an effort to distract people from actually learning the truth about the climate scam.
“SOMETIMES THE MASK SLIPS:” Texas Democrat Forced To Apologize For Saying Gov. Greg Abbott ‘Hates Trees Because One Fell On Him.’
Travis County Judge Sarah Eckhardt was railing against the Texas legislature, complaining about how the state is constantly thwarting municipal policy. The Republicans running state government, she said, just want to stop whatever good things the cities are doing—whether it’s plastic bag bans, fracking bans, even local tree ordinances!
Then she said, “Governor Abbott hates trees because one fell on him.” The hateful crowd laughed.
As all Texans know, Abbott was paralyzed from the waist down at age 26 when a tree fell on him while he was jogging on a windy day in Houston in 1984. He has used a wheelchair ever since. For an elected official to make fun of this, especially on a panel about civic activism, is appalling and offensive.
We have been in an overall cooling tend for 8,000 years. The last inter-glacial lasted 15,000 years, this one one could be longer or shorter.
her sign is made from trees, her ink is made from oil, she lives in a home made from trees, her clothes and her food were cultivated by oil burning tractors.....View attachment 280552
You know how cults sometimes go up to a mountaintop awaiting Armageddon. They tell us that they are the only persons "sayved" and going to heaven.
THEN in the morning they go home dragging their tails behind them depressed because the world did not end and wondering why they had to sign over their wealth and property to their "leader" if the world was ending anyway??
----- Exactly like the "Climate Armageddon" gang. And the kids they are scaring with BS are no better. Somehow the solution is ALWAYS adding a tax (government revenue piles for politicians to spend) to utilities or whatever. then they pretend the problem is "solved" and move on to tax another "EVILLL" influence in the USA.
Which is only to feed their addiction to OPM----Other Peoples' Money.
Why yes, I do.Your fantastical fiction that you are attempting to attribute to me does not speak well for your integrity.
You posted a rant about how we needed to be saved from an ice age that isn't anywhere near. My interpretation of that was on the mark.
Once again...any actual evidence to support that claim?
And that's exactly right. Their "climate" agenda isn't about climate at all, it's their political agenda that they pursue with the zeal of the newly converted.We have been in an overall cooling tend for 8,000 years. The last inter-glacial lasted 15,000 years, this one one could be longer or shorter.
She is unable to accept the fact that with the exception of the little ice age..which the earth is still warming out of...it is cooler now than it has been for most of the past 10,000 years.
But then, this really isn't about science to her...it is about a political agenda...and having a public forum to spew her vinegar...
View attachment 280552
You know how cults sometimes go up to a mountaintop awaiting Armageddon. They tell us that they are the only persons "sayved" and going to heaven.
THEN in the morning they go home dragging their tails behind them depressed because the world did not end and wondering why they had to sign over their wealth and property to their "leader" if the world was ending anyway??
----- Exactly like the "Climate Armageddon" gang. And the kids they are scaring with BS are no better. Somehow the solution is ALWAYS adding a tax (government revenue piles for politicians to spend) to utilities or whatever. then they pretend the problem is "solved" and move on to tax another "EVILLL" influence in the USA.
Which is only to feed their addiction to OPM----Other Peoples' Money.
Gore Effect!View attachment 280552
You know how cults sometimes go up to a mountaintop awaiting Armageddon. They tell us that they are the only persons "sayved" and going to heaven.
THEN in the morning they go home dragging their tails behind them depressed because the world did not end and wondering why they had to sign over their wealth and property to their "leader" if the world was ending anyway??
----- Exactly like the "Climate Armageddon" gang. And the kids they are scaring with BS are no better. Somehow the solution is ALWAYS adding a tax (government revenue piles for politicians to spend) to utilities or whatever. then they pretend the problem is "solved" and move on to tax another "EVILLL" influence in the USA.
Which is only to feed their addiction to OPM----Other Peoples' Money.
Where is Al Gore this weekend? He should be up in Bozeman, MT.
The city is being hit with 8 inches of snow in freaking September, doesn't sound like Global Warming. Gore needs to explain himself and take responsibility
https://www.accuweather.com/en/us/bozeman/59715/daily-weather-forecast/334227?day=1
Actually I was asking the hairball if she had any evidence to support her claim that an ice age was nowhere near. I agree that the long cooling trend we have seen since the holocene optimum tells us that our warm period is not going to hold forever...Why yes, I do.Your fantastical fiction that you are attempting to attribute to me does not speak well for your integrity.
You posted a rant about how we needed to be saved from an ice age that isn't anywhere near. My interpretation of that was on the mark.
Once again...any actual evidence to support that claim?
Our interglacial is known as the Holocene. It's optimuim (warmest period) was about 8,000 years ago, and we have been in a cooling trend, ever since.
Greenland Ice Core Data
Today in Montana.View attachment 280552
You know how cults sometimes go up to a mountaintop awaiting Armageddon. They tell us that they are the only persons "sayved" and going to heaven.
THEN in the morning they go home dragging their tails behind them depressed because the world did not end and wondering why they had to sign over their wealth and property to their "leader" if the world was ending anyway??
----- Exactly like the "Climate Armageddon" gang. And the kids they are scaring with BS are no better. Somehow the solution is ALWAYS adding a tax (government revenue piles for politicians to spend) to utilities or whatever. then they pretend the problem is "solved" and move on to tax another "EVILLL" influence in the USA.
Which is only to feed their addiction to OPM----Other Peoples' Money.
Where is Al Gore this weekend? He should be up in Bozeman, MT.
The city is being hit with 8 inches of snow in freaking September, doesn't sound like Global Warming. Gore needs to explain himself and take responsibility
https://www.accuweather.com/en/us/bozeman/59715/daily-weather-forecast/334227?day=1
[QUOT
Again, you demonstrate that you have never even attempted to look at the science, or check on the truthfulness of what you have been told. You accept whatever you are told so long as it is told to you by people who share your politics....accuracy and truthfulness apparently don't weigh into the equation with you.
You have your "evidence" torn to little pieces by someone using actual published science, and your response is to dodge, and then make the same unsupportable claims over and over again...all the while remaining completely unable to provide any actual science to support your belief...
Climate myths: Ice cores show CO2 increases lag behind temperature rises, disproving the link to global warming | New Scientist
You are answering published, peer reviewed science with a magazine article? Got any real science or is this about the limit of your comfort zone?
By all means, lets see the evidence that supports the claims made in that article...
Waiting.....................
Today in Montana. View attachment 281767
Call me when you anti science loons stop using a hot day in Tulsa as proof.Today in Montana. View attachment 281767
Yet another person who has heard the term 'global warming' and is running with it, thinking (erroneously) that because it still snows that somehow man-induced climate change is being disproven.
The problem with you Deplorables is you think in soundbites instead of delving into matters.
Why yes, I do.Your fantastical fiction that you are attempting to attribute to me does not speak well for your integrity.
You posted a rant about how we needed to be saved from an ice age that isn't anywhere near. My interpretation of that was on the mark.
Once again...any actual evidence to support that claim?
Our interglacial is known as the Holocene. It's optimuim (warmest period) was about 8,000 years ago, and we have been in a cooling trend, ever since.
Greenland Ice Core Data