The Efficacy of a Mueller testimony depends on the questioners.....

[gipper]

Mueller is an elitist big government Deep State asshole. You should know this.

....AND a republican who has chosen to NOT kiss Trump's ass and join the cult....as you have.....LOL

Yeah right.

 

[Auld Phart]

and, just WHEN did Barr take over Muellers investigation?

The very SAME day that Barr became AG.......wasn't it in February of this year?

got any link showing that Barr took over the investigation?

had any involvement before writing his summary?

 

[Lastamender]

What you really want is revenge upon Trump for having the audacity for running and winning the Presidency.

LAME.....very lame.........address the fucking topic or move up the line to kiss Trump's fat ass....lol

address the fucking topic

The topic only exists in your mind. Your ridiculous fantasies only make you look more stupid and hapless. Loser!

 

[Harry Dresden]

all this bullshit shows is why congress has the pathetic approval rating they have.......

 

[Auld Phart]

What you really want is revenge upon Trump for having the audacity for running and winning the Presidency.

LAME.....very lame.........address the fucking topic or move up the line to kiss Trump's fat ass....lol

the topic is lame.

as usual, made up crap from you

 

[Lastamender]

and, just WHEN did Barr take over Muellers investigation?

The very SAME day that Barr became AG.......wasn't it in February of this year?

got any link showing that Barr took over the investigation?

had any involvement before writing his summary?

Are you really expecting an answer?

 

[Auld Phart]

and, just WHEN did Barr take over Muellers investigation?

The very SAME day that Barr became AG.......wasn't it in February of this year?

got any link showing that Barr took over the investigation?

had any involvement before writing his summary?

Are you really expecting an answer?

 

[Sunsettommy]

For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.

The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.

But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.

The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.

Mueller should be asked:

1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?

2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?

3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?

4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?

5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?

6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?

7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?

With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.

Did you find the Prosecution Decision in the Mueller Report, as REQUIRED by Special Counsel Law?

If you have it, POST IT!

He has two possible decisions to make, Prosecution or Declination, that is all.

28 CFR § 600.8 - Notification and reports by the Special Counsel.

"(c)Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

bolding mine

=======================================================================
If you can't post his Prosecution Decision you seem to claim exist, then SHUT UP!

 

[nat4900]

got any link showing that Barr took over the investigation?

Now that even more stupid than your usual bullshit........Are you implying that Barr did NOT take over the Mueller investigation?? Why the fuck did Mueller hand over the report to him then?

 

[Lakhota]

The Efficacy of a Mueller testimony depends on the questioners.....

I totally agree! Mueller must be asked detailed and pointed questions by professional lawyers who are not trying to grandstand. Hence: Efficacy.

 

[MisterBeale]

What you really want is revenge upon Trump for having the audacity for running and winning the Presidency.

LAME.....very lame.........address the fucking topic or move up the line to kiss Trump's fat ass....lol

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

ts over gnat...you have flown into the blue light....

What??? The FUN is just beginning

"Baby, you ain't kidding!"
- Bill

 

[Lastamender]

The Efficacy of a Mueller testimony depends on the questioners.....

I totally agree! Mueller must be asked detailed and pointed questions by professional lawyers who are not trying to grandstand. Hence: Efficacy.

That translates to we can't stand losing.

 

[nat4900]

For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.

The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.

But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.

The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.

Mueller should be asked:

1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?

2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?

3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?

4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?

5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?

6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?

7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?

With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.

Did you find the Prosecution Decision in the Mueller Report, as REQUIRED by Special Counsel Law?

If you have it, POST IT!

He has two possible decisions to make, Prosecution or Declination, that is all.

28 CFR § 600.8 - Notification and reports by the Special Counsel.

"(c)Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

bolding mine

=======================================================================
If you can't post his Prosecution Decision you seem to claim exist, then SHUT UP!

Mueller said his investigation encountered "difficult issues" of law .......i.e., the DOJ policy that he could NOT indict a sitting president.....since the sitting president would not be able to stand trial and "prove his innocence"....

 

[nat4900]

The Efficacy of a Mueller testimony depends on the questioners.....

I totally agree! Mueller must be asked detailed and pointed questions by professional lawyers who are not trying to grandstand. Hence: Efficacy.

.....but, the usual morons on here are "blasting" my thread...they should know that .. I LOVE IT............lol

 

[Auld Phart]

got any link showing that Barr took over the investigation?

Now that even more stupid than your usual bullshit........Are you implying that Barr did NOT take over the Mueller investigation?? Why the fuck did Mueller hand over the report to him then?

Barr had NOTHING to do with the report, it Mueller finished it, and handed it to him.

You're welcome to PROVE otherwise

 

[Auld Phart]

The Efficacy of a Mueller testimony depends on the questioners.....

I totally agree! Mueller must be asked detailed and pointed questions by professional lawyers who are not trying to grandstand. Hence: Efficacy.

But, the usual morons on here are "blasting" my thread......AND I LOVE IT............lol

I'm starting to believe that's the reason you start them.

You're the moron, and have a need to prove it.

 

[nat4900]

Barr had NOTHING to do with the report, it Mueller finished it, and handed it to him.

You're welcome to PROVE otherwise

Not up to me to prove Barr's possible interference......
I'll let the questioners ask Mueller DIRECTLY.....and under oath.........Would you have ANY objections to Mueller responding to such a question????..................LOL

 

[MisterBeale]

The Efficacy of a Mueller testimony depends on the questioners.....

I totally agree! Mueller must be asked detailed and pointed questions by professional lawyers who are not trying to grandstand. Hence: Efficacy.

 

[Auld Phart]

Barr had NOTHING to do with the report, it Mueller finished it, and handed it to him.

You're welcome to PROVE otherwise

Not up to me to prove Barr's possible interference......
I'll let the questioners ask Mueller DIRECTLY.....and under oath.........Would you have ANY objections to Mueller responding to such a question????..................LOL

Not up to me to prove Barr's possible interference......

as far as this thread goes, it is up to you.

YOU made the claim in the OP.


back it up.