Merchan's mistrial ruling and the efficacy of incompetence.

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

There is so little chance of a successful appeal.

 

[BackAgain]

This is pretty funny on its own way.

probably because idiot Trump insisted… the defense tried to claim that there was no sexual relationship

Which opened the door for Daniels to describe the relationship in court.

The defense claims that the description was so lurid and basically disgusting that it would prejudice the jury and they are probably correct…but it was their fault that testimony ever got on the record

The court’s “decision” that denial of her underlying false claim “opened the door” is a biased and erroneous one. Merchan is a hack.

The point of paying for an NDA isn’t to acknowledge a false claim of the supposed prior sexual relations; nor is it to concede that any sexual relations took place.

The point of paying is exclusively to silence the porno ho’s claim. So, whether it’s true or not provides no honest or valid legal basis for Merchan’s scumbag ruling.

 

[berg80]

The court’s “decision” that denial of her underlying false claim “opened the door” is a biased and erroneous one. Merchan is a hack.

I love it when morons give their legal opinions.

 

[BackAgain]

I love it when morons give their legal opinions.

You only love hearing what you wish to believe.

 

[Lesh]

The court’s “decision” that denial of her underlying false claim “opened the door” is a biased and erroneous one. Merchan is a hack.

The point of paying for an NDA isn’t to acknowledge a false claim of the supposed prior sexual relations; nor is it to concede that any sexual relations took place.

The point of paying is exclusively to silence the porno ho’s claim. So, whether it’s true or not provides no honest or valid legal basis for Merchan’s scumbag ruling.

By claiming that sex never happened that opened the door for her to testify that it did.

That’s how it works

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Defense managed to ask a question that allowed stormy to correction the formal record.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You only live hearing what you wish to believe.

That’s ironic as hell and of course entirely unoriginal.
“Back Again” loves to repackage and repurpose what posters say to him. It’s a form of lazy projection. This makes him a very dull boy indeed.

 

[BackAgain]

By claiming that sex never happened that opened the door for her to testify that it did.

That’s how it works

No. That’s not how it works.

If the question about whether he boinked the Ho was a material element at all, which it absolutely is not, then maybe the declaration by the defense would have “opened the door” to what the persecution improperly did and what the court erroneously permitted.

But since it is immaterial — and thus irrelevant to any material issue at the trial — the persecution committed prosecutorial misconduct and the judge committed judicial error.

 

[BackAgain]

That’s ironic as hell and of course entirely unoriginal.
“Back Again” loves to repackage and repurpose what posters say to him. It’s a form of lazy projection. This makes him a very dull boy indeed.

Fakey, of course, is always guilty of the very things which he falsely accuses other of.

Fakey is a vermin scumbag and off topic.

Merchan’s idiotic rulings are the topic here, child.