The Fallacy of Race

[BobPlumb]

OK! I will go along with the denial of race thing if doing this will end racism. Let's start by ending all affirmative action.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Yep, let's treat everyone equally. How about it?

 

[Friends]

Go and read; you lazy, ignorant shit. This stuff has been posted over and over and over.

There were a lot of copy and paste jobs. If I want hot air from the internet I will look for it myself. Unless you are able to explain what "social construct" means in your own words you don't understand it yourself.

What I mean by "race" is a group of human beings which for centuries or longer has evolved similar characteristics in response to a similar environment, and which has common ancestors.

If you bothered to educated yourself even to the extremely limited extent of reading what has already been linked to over and over then YOU wouldn't need to waste so much of the oxygen you are wasting spouting the same old bullshit that, when you get down to it, is just an expression of your base cowardice.

Your chronic insults are a revelation of the fact that you have nothing to contribute to a serious discussion.

Two generations after the civil rights legislation was signed blacks still have a rate of violent crime that is nearly eight times the white rate. Vast sums of money have not been able to reduce the race gap in intellectual performance and achievement. These are significant facts that belie what is becoming a liberal dogma that race is only a social construct.

If I know that a man is black I can guess with a fair degree of reliability that he is probably rather stupid and that he has at least one illegitimate child. It is also likely that he has at least one felony conviction.

I can understand why someone would feel sorry for blacks. I have difficulty understanding why anyone would admire them.

 

[Bumberclyde]

Personally, I think the blacks in the US are still a tad miffed that we didn't send them all back to Africa once they were freed. Any black convicted of a crime should be sent back to Nigeria, where they'll feel right at home.

 

[Wake]

"Race" is a man-made idea. Some have argued that because it's just an idea, it should be disregarded.

So then let's argue that because everything else like equality and human rights are man-made ideas, we should disregard them as well.

Either all ideas are man-made hypothetical constructs that can/should be disregarded, or they aren't.

 

[editec]

Race is sort of like breed.

If you're of a different race you are still part of the same species.

It makes about as much sense to say you are of the BLONDE RACE as it does to say your are a member of the WHITE RACE.

Both are describing something biolgically real, but from the standpoint of the biolgical species, not anything very important.

It might make MORE sense to describe different races by BLOOD TYPE as by skin color.

After all, people of different blood types are significantly and much more importantly different than people of the same blood type with different skin colors.

I am member of the A+ race, myself.

All the rest of you bloods types are sub-humans compared to my vastly superior A+ race.

 

[Snookie]

"Race" is a man-made idea. Some have argued that because it's just an idea, it should be disregarded.

So then let's argue that because everything else like equality and human rights are man-made ideas, we should disregard them as well.

Either all ideas are man-made hypothetical constructs that can/should be disregarded, or they aren't.

Human rights are defined pretty well in the ten commandents.

The idea of modern race was started as a result of anthropologists measuring skull size and other such nonsense. They used junk science to introduce their fallacious theories.

Human rights theories are based on mental factors. Read the declaration of independence. It pretty well covers human rights.

 

[Snookie]

"Race" is a man-made idea. Some have argued that because it's just an idea, it should be disregarded.

So then let's argue that because everything else like equality and human rights are man-made ideas, we should disregard them as well.

Either all ideas are man-made hypothetical constructs that can/should be disregarded, or they aren't.

What did you say? Are you for or against? Can''t have it both ways. Read my post.^

 

[Unkotare]

If I know that a man is black I can guess with a fair degree of reliability that he is probably rather stupid .

You are guessing, but we know for sure that you are without a doubt extremely stupid.

 

[Wake]

"Race" is a man-made idea. Some have argued that because it's just an idea, it should be disregarded.

So then let's argue that because everything else like equality and human rights are man-made ideas, we should disregard them as well.

Either all ideas are man-made hypothetical constructs that can/should be disregarded, or they aren't.

What did you say? Are you for or against? Can''t have it both ways. Read my post.^

I can either be for or against the concept of race... or note that it, like every other idea, is created by man.

If one has to be against it because it's an idea, then that person would have to be against every other concept out there as well, because those too are made up like race.

 

[Friends]

Yep, let's treat everyone equally. How about it?

I treat blacks equally when they prove to me that they behave and perform as well as most whites. Most can't, and deserve to be treated like inferiors.

 

[squeeze berry]

Race is sort of like breed.

If you're of a different race you are still part of the same species.

It makes about as much sense to say you are of the BLONDE RACE as it does to say your are a member of the WHITE RACE.

Both are describing something biolgically real, but from the standpoint of the biolgical species, not anything very important.

It might make MORE sense to describe different races by BLOOD TYPE as by skin color.

After all, people of different blood types are significantly and much more importantly different than people of the same blood type with different skin colors.

I am member of the A+ race, myself.

All the rest of you bloods types are sub-humans compared to my vastly superior A+ race.

A+


proof positive there is grade inflation

 

[holston]

If race doesn't exist, then how can "racism" exist?

If racism didn't exist, what would the Jews, the Negroes, and the Mexicans have to bitch about all the time?

Genotype-phenotype distinction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The genotype–phenotype distinction is drawn in genetics. "Genotype" is an organism's full hereditary information. "Phenotype" is an organism's actual observed properties, such as morphology, development, or behavior. This distinction is fundamental in the study of inheritance of traits and their evolution.

It is the organism's physical properties which directly determine its chances of survival and reproductive output, while the inheritance of physical properties occurs only as a secondary consequence of the inheritance of genes. Therefore, to properly understand the theory of evolution via natural selection, one must understand the genotype–phenotype distinction. The genes cause a trait, and the phenotype is the observable expression of the genes (and therefore the genotype that affects the trait).

I would agree that "race" is a social construct insofar as the concept has been used by Zionist social engineers and Marxist liberals in their crusade to destroy "white" Anglo Saxon society and Christianity in particular.

It is noted that leftists, "liberals", and Jews are the world's foremost whiners about racial discrimination. They have used this accusation effectively as a social bludgeon by which they help advance themselves.

Now we have this same Cabal trying to promote the idea that race doesn't exist and that it is purely a social construct.

It is a social construct alright, one which they have used for decades in their divide and conquer strategy to gain control of the US.

European medieval models of race generally mixed Classical ideas with the notion that humanity as a whole was descended from Shem, Ham and Japheth, the three sons of Noah, producing distinct Semitic (Asiatic), Hamitic (African), and Japhetic (Indo-European) peoples. This theory dates back to the Judeo-Christian tradition, as described in the Babylonian Talmud, which states that "the descendants of Ham are cursed by being black, and [it] depicts Ham as a sinful man and his progeny as degenerates."

In contrast there are the ancient Greek theories of the origin of race:

Hippocrates believed, as many thinkers throughout early history did, that factors such as geography and climate played a significant role in the physical appearance of different peoples. He writes that, “the forms and dispositions of mankind correspond with the nature of the country.”

Despite these previous admissions, the Jew edited Wikipedia goes on to state:

The word "race," along with many of the ideas now associated with the term were products of European imperialism and colonization during the age of exploration.

Which leads one to ask: If "race" was the product of European imperialists, how could the concept appear in the Talmud which predates European exploration and colonization by centuries, not to mention the theory proposed by Hippocrates?


Leave it to the Neo-Talmudists to find a way to hang any "socially constructed" rap on the white Anglo Saxon male.


The biological component of "race" is evidenced by the fact that different races may have among themselves certain tendencies to inherit certain diseases such as Sickle Cell Anemia among blacks, or Tay Sachs among Jews.

How the race baiters hang this one on whitey is beyond me. Leave it to them, they will find a way. Or should I say "construct"?

 

[holston]

If I know that a man is black I can guess with a fair degree of reliability that he is probably rather stupid .

You are guessing, but we know for sure that you are without a doubt extremely stupid.

In contrast to a Jew, which when you see one, you know automatically that he has to be intellectually SUPERIOR.

Right?

 

[holston]

NJJN - Drew University scholar defends article exposing Lakewood rabbi’s ‘racialist’ text

As a scandal over a Lakewood rabbi’s book describing gentiles as an “evil” species continues to simmer inside Jewish circles, the Drew University scholar who broke the explosive story says that he has no regrets about bringing the matter to light.

“Regrets? No!” Allen Nadler exclaimed into the telephone from Boston, where he was attending a conference. “Not only don’t I regret writing the piece, I wish it had been harder-hitting and more critical about what’s going on in the Orthodox community.”

Nadler, director of the Jewish Studies Program at Drew in Madison, published his story in the Dec. 19 issue of the New York-based Forward, shining a spotlight on a recently published Hebrew-language book that claims that Jews constitute a genetically superior species and that gentiles are “completely evil.”

The book, Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut — which can be translated as “Jewish Superiority and the Question of Exile” — was self-published by Rabbi Sadya Grama of Lakewood, an alumnus of Beth Medrash Govoha, a prominent Orthodox yeshiva in Lakewood.

“The difference between the people of Israel and the nations of the world is an essential one,” the book claims. “The Jew by his source and in his very essence is entirely good. The goy, by his source and in his very essence, is completely evil. This is not simply a matter of religious distinction, but rather of two completely different species.”

 

[Snookie]

Yep, let's treat everyone equally. How about it?

I treat blacks equally when they prove to me that they behave and perform as well as most whites. Most can't, and deserve to be treated like inferiors.

Now aren't you special?

 

[Snookie]

Jews are the best doctors.

 

[Unkotare]

I treat blacks equally when they prove to me that they behave and perform as well as most whites. Most can't, and deserve to be treated like inferiors.

YOU have proven to everyone over and over that you are an ignorant, idiotic, hateful coward. How do YOU expect to be treated?

 

[Unkotare]

If I know that a man is black I can guess with a fair degree of reliability that he is probably rather stupid .

You are guessing, but we know for sure that you are without a doubt extremely stupid.

In contrast to a Jew, which when you see one, you know automatically that he has to be intellectually SUPERIOR.

Right?

I was addressing my remarks to one particularly inferior INDIVIDUAL. Did you miss that part? It is possible to judge people as individuals and not faceless representatives of some group, you know. And, Judaism is a religion, not a race.

 

[Snookie]

You are guessing, but we know for sure that you are without a doubt extremely stupid.

In contrast to a Jew, which when you see one, you know automatically that he has to be intellectually SUPERIOR.

Right?

I was addressing my remarks to one particularly inferior INDIVIDUAL. Did you miss that part? It is possible to judge people as individuals and not faceless representatives of some group, you know. And, Judaism is a religion, not a race.

He didn't know that. You might have made his head hurt with that one.