The FBI Data Dump Will keep on Giving

william the wie

Gold Member
Nov 18, 2009
16,667
2,402
Hillary is attempting to make Trump's giving of bribes, at least one illegal one from his family foundation to FL AG Bondi was caught, equivalent to Hillary's acceptance of bribes again through her family foundation. That is a dumb move.

Doheny in the teapot dome scandal was acquited of giving the bribes that at least one cabinet secretary went to jail for accepting. The same evidence was used in both trials. That is the mountain she has chosen to climb and that will not end well for her. Accepting a bribe is much bigger crime than giving one which can be passed off as extortion.
 
not the same thing as hillarys pay for play

at the very least trump was not a federal employee
 
play for pay seems to be the case according to Hillary's emails, how much evidence of her accepting bribes do you need?
 
play for pay seems to be the case according to Hillary's emails, how much evidence of her accepting bribes do you need?

There is nothing to charge Hillary with....it's all conspiracy theories.

The FBI has fully exonerated Hillary for the email situation, there were no charges whatsoever.
 
play for pay seems to be the case according to Hillary's emails, how much evidence of her accepting bribes do you need?

There is nothing to charge Hillary with....it's all conspiracy theories.

The FBI has fully exonerated Hillary for the email situation, there were no charges whatsoever.
play for pay seems to be the case according to Hillary's emails, how much evidence of her accepting bribes do you need?

There is nothing to charge Hillary with....it's all conspiracy theories.

The FBI has fully exonerated Hillary for the email situation, there were no charges whatsoever.
She justified her lack of recollection by citing her concussion and brain clot. Proving that you can get an incompetency ruling at the drop of a hat is NOT exoneration. It does mean that prosecuting you is not possible. The FBI decided not to prosecute when the defendant was not competent to stand trial, which is pretty standard.
 
play for pay seems to be the case according to Hillary's emails, how much evidence of her accepting bribes do you need?

There is nothing to charge Hillary with....it's all conspiracy theories.

The FBI has fully exonerated Hillary for the email situation, there were no charges whatsoever.
play for pay seems to be the case according to Hillary's emails, how much evidence of her accepting bribes do you need?

There is nothing to charge Hillary with....it's all conspiracy theories.

The FBI has fully exonerated Hillary for the email situation, there were no charges whatsoever.
She justified her lack of recollection by citing her concussion and brain clot. Proving that you can get an incompetency ruling at the drop of a hat is NOT exoneration. It does mean that prosecuting you is not possible. The FBI decided not to prosecute when the defendant was not competent to stand trial, which is pretty standard.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3039030/Hillary-Clinton-FBI-Investigation.pdf

‘While State policy during Clinton’s tenure required that “day-to-day operations [at State] be conducted on [an authorized information system],” according to the REDACTED the Bureau of Information Security Management, REDACTED there was no restriction on the use of personal e-mail accounts for official business.’ (page 11)

The FBI has stated that no laws or rules were broken by Hillary. You can make opinions that she was "unsafe" or careless...but you cannot make a criminal charge against her, especially after the FBI has publicly stated no laws or rules were broken.
 

Forum List

Back
Top