The Film Maker Is Arrested

[Listening]

you people now defend criminals from the laws to maintian your historically failed ideas.


you have sunk very low

What is his crime?

No one is defending the film, you idiot, only his right to make it.

Well, how about "reckless endangerment" to start with.

Now everyone in that film will probably end up being a target for some whacko, even though they had no idea what they were making. (They dubbed in the offending voiceovers.)

If anyone who made anything controversial was held back for that reason, we'd have no cable TV.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

you people now defend criminals from the laws to maintian your historically failed ideas.


you have sunk very low

What is his crime?

No one is defending the film, you idiot, only his right to make it.

Well, how about "reckless endangerment" to start with.

Now everyone in that film will probably end up being a target for some whacko, even though they had no idea what they were making. (They dubbed in the offending voiceovers.)

Yep obama's appeasement is reckless endangerment

 

[JoeB131]

They released him without charges after 30 minutes of questioning.

Now he has a 2 billion dollar lawsuit....

Not really. The guy was on probation. They can pull him in any time they feel like, they can search his house without a warrent, etc.

 

[JoeB131]

What is his crime?

No one is defending the film, you idiot, only his right to make it.

Well, how about "reckless endangerment" to start with.

Now everyone in that film will probably end up being a target for some whacko, even though they had no idea what they were making. (They dubbed in the offending voiceovers.)

If anyone who made anything controversial was held back for that reason, we'd have no cable TV.

We aren't talking about "anything" controversial.

We are talking about something that is patently offensive against the religion of 1.3 billion people.

Here's the thing, in Islam ANY representation of the Prophet is considered a sin. That's why there are no statues of him in the Middle East. A filmmaker could make a film about him as positive as "Passion of the Christ" and as sympathetic, and Muslims would still consider that a sin.

Now, yeah, I think Muslims (and everyone else) need to realize we are in the Information age and anyone with a YouTube Account (Or an USMB account, for that matter) can say something about your religion you are going to find offensive.

 

[JoeB131]

Well, how about "reckless endangerment" to start with.

There is no endangerment by mere expression.

People in that film had no idea what kind of film they were starring in.

And I'll bet a lot of them are in hiding right now.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Well, how about "reckless endangerment" to start with.

There is no endangerment by mere expression.

Sure there is.

You can't go into a crowded movie theater and yell fire.

You can't go on to a plane and talk about bombs.

There's alot of "reckless endangerment" that comes from mere expression.

Not mere expression.

Shouting in a theatre and bombs on planes is using direct uttered speech as an active projection of threat.

Writing a book, poem, song or movie is expression.

 

[mamooth]

What the righties fail to mention is that the Federal Probation Service -- the organization in charge of ordering federal offenders to be brought in for probation issues -- doesn't fall under the executive branch. They are part of the judicial branch. Last I checked, the president doesn't run the judicial branch.

So, by the logic of the righties here, the jackbooted gestapo thug who clearly must have personally ordered the action would be the head of the judicial branch, Chief Justice John G Roberts. (That is, unless Chief Justice Roberts is really an Obama pawn.)

Now, if the righties have any consistency, they'll start screaming that Chief Justice Roberts and his Republican supporters are all freedom-hating thugs. They can begin doing that now. Or not, thus proving again how they're truth-hating partisan shills. They'll most likely just snarl some curses at me, and then scuttle back into their dark crevices.

 

[OODA_Loop]

What the righties fail to mention is that the Federal Probation Service -- the organization in charge of ordering federal offenders to be brought in for probation issues -- doesn't fall under the executive branch. They are part of the judicial branch. Last I checked, the president doesn't run the judicial branch.

Right Obama has no influence on Holder.

 

[Sallow]

There is no endangerment by mere expression.

Sure there is.

You can't go into a crowded movie theater and yell fire.

You can't go on to a plane and talk about bombs.

There's alot of "reckless endangerment" that comes from mere expression.

Not mere expression.

Shouting in a theatre and bombs on planes is using direct uttered speech as an active projection of threat.

Writing a book, poem, song or movie is expression.

There you go..qualifying shit.

Your premise was wrong.

It's simple enough to say so.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Sure there is.

You can't go into a crowded movie theater and yell fire.

You can't go on to a plane and talk about bombs.

There's alot of "reckless endangerment" that comes from mere expression.

Not mere expression.

Shouting in a theatre and bombs on planes is using direct uttered speech as an active projection of threat.

Writing a book, poem, song or movie is expression.

There you go..qualifying shit.

Your premise was wrong.

It's simple enough to say so.

You had to use utterance of direct threats as a poor example.

Name a book or song that is a direct threat and endangerment ?

 

[waltky]

Free speech ain't so free...

... when ya violate others' rights...

... to live an' breathe.

 

[007]

So at this point, it has become CRYSTAL CLEAR that is it the libroid, moron, brain washed left's intent to attempt to tell a lie over and over in hopes that it will deflect away from the truth.

LIBROID LIE: Some little amateur, two year old video is the cause of an islamo-jihad uprising that the obama administration was warned about three days prior that resulted in the deaths of Americans including an ambassador.

THE TRUTH: This killing was a terrorist act that was planned out MONTHS in ADVANCE of any obscure little youtube video becoming known, and was meant to be implemented on the anniversary of 9/11.

 

[mamooth]

Right Obama has no influence on Holder.

So, how do Holder's Black Panthers fit into that conspiracy?

And why won't the freedom-hating conservatives condemn Gestapo thug Chief Justice Roberts? Oh wait, I just said why. They hate freedom. Along with puppies.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

You guys got some weird ass heroes.

you mean like your liberal hero Larry Flynt and his pornography....?


i'd think you'd support this guy.....after all he had some porn in his video........


at least there was a serious reason for the anti-Islamic video....the terror, persecution, and murder of Coptic Christians in Egypt by Muslim extremists....

Larry Flynt?

He's cool.

I especially loved it when he turned Hustler into a war mag for one issue.

And showed what obscenity really looks like.

of course you would think so.....libs are duplicitous scumbags....

on one hand you defend the 1st for the 'free speech' of porn......you attack Christianity for its morality...

on the other you subvert the 1st for free speech against a terrorist religious group.....you don't like attacks on a favored group of yours.....so you defend their form of morality....

 

[NYcarbineer]

What was false about the movie???? Did Mohammed not marry a child?

Incitement need not be based on falsehoods. You could wrongly incite a mob to lynch someone without a trial, even if that person were the perpetrator of a crime.

The movie does not incite violence anymore than me calling you an idiot does.

Idiot.

Why aren't telling that to all your 'nut friends who claim otherwise?

 

[bripat9643]

The movie does not incite violence anymore than me calling you an idiot does.

Idiot.

Why aren't telling that to all your 'nut friends who claim otherwise?

Which "friends" are those?

 

[Dissent]

People are morons. If he is arrested it will be because he violated his federal probation which states he isn't allowed near a computer or other camera's etc...

 

[bripat9643]

The South didn't attack the North, dipshit.

Sure it did.

Pick up a book.

Asshole.

Really? Where did this attack occur?

 

[bripat9643]

What the righties fail to mention is that the Federal Probation Service -- the organization in charge of ordering federal offenders to be brought in for probation issues -- doesn't fall under the executive branch. They are part of the judicial branch. Last I checked, the president doesn't run the judicial branch.

So, by the logic of the righties here, the jackbooted gestapo thug who clearly must have personally ordered the action would be the head of the judicial branch, Chief Justice John G Roberts. (That is, unless Chief Justice Roberts is really an Obama pawn.)

Now, if the righties have any consistency, they'll start screaming that Chief Justice Roberts and his Republican supporters are all freedom-hating thugs. They can begin doing that now. Or not, thus proving again how they're truth-hating partisan shills. They'll most likely just snarl some curses at me, and then scuttle back into their dark crevices.

The LAPD Chief of Police was appointed by a Democrat.

Enough said.

 

[bodecea]

What the righties fail to mention is that the Federal Probation Service -- the organization in charge of ordering federal offenders to be brought in for probation issues -- doesn't fall under the executive branch. They are part of the judicial branch. Last I checked, the president doesn't run the judicial branch.

Right Obama has no influence on Holder.

Holder is the Attorney General...Executive Branch....Judicial Branch is who is in charge. Thank you for showing your lack of knowledge about the 3 Branches of Government.