bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
- 2,180
Yep.
Along with the notion that the south was right to attack the north.
The South didn't attack the North, dipshit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep.
Along with the notion that the south was right to attack the north.
you people now defend criminals from the laws to maintian your historically failed ideas.
you have sunk very low
What is his crime?
the fact that the guy....no matter what his personal situation.......
was TRACKED DOWN and arrested and taken in for questioning ABOUT the video.....
is in itself VERY chilling.........
That didn't happen moron
That's an inaccurate generalization.
No, its an outright lie.
Progressives and liberals have been at the forefront for decades defending the right of Americans to engage in free expression, even when that speech is unpopular.
Your definition of progressive must be different form that the rest of the world uses.
Yep.
Along with the notion that the south was right to attack the north.
The South didn't attack the North, dipshit.
the fact that the guy....no matter what his personal situation.......
was TRACKED DOWN and arrested and taken in for questioning ABOUT the video.....
is in itself VERY chilling.........
That didn't happen moron
It sure as hell did.
you people now defend criminals from the laws to maintian your historically failed ideas.
you have sunk very low
What is his crime?
Yeah, I was wondering the same thing. The PC Police are evidently no longer able to distinguish PC from actual crimes. I suppose it was inevitable.
.
What is his crime?
Yeah, I was wondering the same thing. The PC Police are evidently no longer able to distinguish PC from actual crimes. I suppose it was inevitable.
.
His crime was expressing an opinion that Obama found inconvenient.
That didn't happen moron
It sure as hell did.
The lapd stated he volunteered to come and talk and it was all staged..
Get an education.
It might be legal,
but it's hardly heroic to intentionally produce propaganda whose sole purpose is to incite people to violence.
If this propaganda had a different, higher, nobler purpose, one might be able to defend its production despite its intentionally inflammatory content.
It is gratuitously inciteful, with no redeeming alternate value. That makes it unequivocally repugnant.
blame the flim maker for the actions of others? You're a fucking moron.
Why not? You had no trouble blaming obama for all the shootings..
Yeah, I was wondering the same thing. The PC Police are evidently no longer able to distinguish PC from actual crimes. I suppose it was inevitable.
.
His crime was expressing an opinion that Obama found inconvenient.
He wasn't arrested..
you people now defend criminals from the laws to maintian your historically failed ideas.
you have sunk very low
What is his crime?
No one is defending the film, you idiot, only his right to make it.
Now he has a 2 billion dollar lawsuit....They released him without charges after 30 minutes of questioning.
Yep.
Along with the notion that the south was right to attack the north.
The South didn't attack the North, dipshit.
Well, how about "reckless endangerment" to start with.
You guys got some weird ass heroes.
you mean like your liberal hero Larry Flynt and his pornography....?
i'd think you'd support this guy.....after all he had some porn in his video........
at least there was a serious reason for the anti-Islamic video....the terror, persecution, and murder of Coptic Christians in Egypt by Muslim extremists....
Well, how about "reckless endangerment" to start with.
There is no endangerment by mere expression.
you have some really shitty heros nowadays