It's truly amazing that we've got 3 posters who are willfully ignorant and intellectually dishonest/bankrupt enough to think that just attacking the name source is enough to discredit the information contained WITHOUT EVER ACTUALLY READING THE INFORMATION CONTAINED.
That is the difference between neocons/teabaggers and liberals/progressives......the latter will go toe to toe with any accusation/assertion and debate the issue using ALL the facts available. The former just bark like seals at the headlines and keep repeating their opinion/supposition and conjecture like third rate propagandist.
Let's watch them prove my case.
So debate it. Say why the content resonates with you. Give us your views.
You say why you agree with it, then I'll read it. Why expect others to make an effort when you've made so little yourself?
Either you're drunk or a poor liar or too damned lazy to back track a discussion on a thread.
As the chronology of the posts shows, not only did I express my personal viewpoint, but I backed it up with valid, documented FACTS. Seems its YOU and your cohorts who want to discuss this issue based solely on your opinion, supposition and conjecture. Sorry if I don't play that game, because it's akin to debating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
The chronology of the posts validates my stance. If you won't acknowledge the information provided, that's not my problem nor does it warrant wasting any further time on you.
Drunk? At this time of day?
Liar? Unless you think I'm lying about thinking you should post an opinion along with your link, I don't see how that follows.
My point was you should have done it at the beginning.
And BTW the answer is I'm too damn lazy.