Hang on Sloopy
Diamond Member
- Jul 12, 2015
- 20,793
- 28,086
Do you want someone on the SC that can't define what a woman is?And the girl was 8
She is clearly mentally ill...................And if she was a white bitch this post would be the same
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you want someone on the SC that can't define what a woman is?And the girl was 8
The woman follows the sentencing rules that Congress makes, even for crimes as terrible as child pornography. But that's bad according to the Republicans in the Senate Judiciary committee.
Is Jackson so damn perfect that this is the best the opposition could come up with?
She thinks the court can make law. That alone disqualifies herThe woman follows the sentencing rules that Congress makes, even for crimes as terrible as child pornography. But that's bad according to the Republicans in the Senate Judiciary committee.
Is Jackson so damn perfect that this is the best the opposition could come up with?
Or to those in the judiciary that give them lighter sentences.No one is "very sympathetic to pedos".
It figures that a bimbo whore just cant get the story straight.The woman follows the sentencing rules that Congress makes, even for crimes as terrible as child pornography. But that's bad according to the Republicans in the Senate Judiciary committee.
Is Jackson so damn perfect that this is the best the opposition could come up with?
It is your opinion that maximum sentences should always be imposed in all criminal cases regardless of the circumstances? No one seems to know much about the case in question. Maybe she thought being a lifetime pariah on the sex offender list counted as a penalty as well?Or to those in the judiciary that give them lighter sentences.
It is your opinion that maximum sentences should always be imposed in all criminal cases regardless of the circumstances? No one seems to know much about the case in question. Maybe she thought being a lifetime pariah on the sex offender list counted as a penalty as well?
If the nominee had not followed the sentencing guidelines the prosecution had the opportunity to repeal the sentencing. Of course Judge Jackson never had the time before being interrupted by the rudest most obnoxious US Senators.No, that is not the claim.
The claim is that she does NOT follow those sentencing guidelines. The gripe was that the sentence of 3 months for the case when was questioned on most was WAY below the guidelines.
The thread title is false.
What does that have to do with the fact she was outside the sentencing guidelines and the OP claim that she was within those lines."A couple of observations: One is that your chart does not include all of the factors that Congress has told judges to consider, including the probation office’s recommendation in these cases," Jackson responded, prompting Cruz to say the committee did not have those recommendations available for review.
![]()
Jackson forcefully pushes back against GOP child porn sentencing attacks
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson opened the second day of her confirmation hearing Tuesday with a forceful defense of her record of sentencing child pornography offenders, pushing back against a recurri…thehill.com
Again, irrelevant. It is not an if, the fact is guidelines were not followed. That is an objective fact.If the nominee had not followed the sentencing guidelines the prosecution had the opportunity to repeal the sentencing. Of course Judge Jackson never had the time before being interrupted by the rudest most obnoxious US Senators.
This.Yeah until I know the facts, I really dunno what to say. She said she gave the kid 3 months in federal prison. He was 18. That's really all I know, other than what Josh Hawley said -- which was the ages of the victims.
It is your opinion that maximum sentences should always be imposed in all criminal cases regardless of the circumstances? No one seems to know much about the case in question. Maybe she thought being a lifetime pariah on the sex offender list counted as a penalty as well?
If the nominee had not followed the sentencing guidelines the prosecution had the opportunity to repeal the sentencing. Of course Judge Jackson never had the time before being interrupted by the rudest most obnoxious US Senators.
This.
There is not enough known to make this a problem with the nomination.
I will make a conjecture that more is not known specifically because it would not be a big issue if the details were outlined.
What are you talking about...she ignored the federal sentencing guidelines in all of her pedophile cases and gave the criminal a much reduced sentence.The woman follows the sentencing rules that Congress makes, even for crimes as terrible as child pornography. But that's bad according to the Republicans in the Senate Judiciary committee.
Is Jackson so damn perfect that this is the best the opposition could come up with?
She sentenced this individual to 3 months in prison when the recommended sensed was 3 years. That’s a bit of an issue considering the crime. This person had 600 pieces of child pornography in his possession.The woman follows the sentencing rules that Congress makes, even for crimes as terrible as child pornography. But that's bad according to the Republicans in the Senate Judiciary committee.
Is Jackson so damn perfect that this is the best the opposition could come up with?
as Ohio State law professor and sentencing policy expert Douglas Berman writes, “the federal sentencing guidelines for” child pornography offenders “are widely recognized as dysfunctional and unduly severe.”Yet she's been overturned by her own appellate court for inventing law. Go freaking figure. Isn't that the very definition of an activist judge.
.