The GOP's big beef against Ketanji Brown Jackson is that she's NOT an activist judge

there is always an impeachment process for all judges.
But she wouldnt have made it this far if there was something wrong with her.


Though impeachment is in the Constitution, it's pretty much moot when politicians care more for party than country.

.
 
Her response to this particular line of questioning has been disingenuous. She exercised discretion that went beyond both the sentencing guidelines and the prosecutor's recommendation. She COULD HAVE stated that she saw the defendant, watched all the testimony, and simply made what she considered the best possible sentence, all things considered. Maybe she didn't want to destroy the life of an 18-year-old whose crime harmed no one, except by strained inference.

As I have stated elsewhere on this Board, the "cool" thing about these hearings is that KBJ feels compelled to articulate a judicial philosophy that would make the late Justice Scalia proud, because if she were honest and candid her nomination would be almost universally scorned.

The RIGHT has won the debate for the hearts and minds of the American people: NOBODY wants another activist justice who ignores the law and the Constitution when they conflict with their personal political preferences.

So the children portrayed in the video were not harmed?
 
The woman follows the sentencing rules that Congress makes, even for crimes as terrible as child pornography. But that's bad according to the Republicans in the Senate Judiciary committee.

Is Jackson so damn perfect that this is the best the opposition could come up with?
She's an activist she's a leftist activist.
 
You stupid SOB, prosecutors can't "repeal" anything a judge does.

.
Although prosecutors are not able to appeal a not guilty verdict, they are able to appeal when a judge hands down a criminal sentence that they do not believe meets the legal standards for what the law should impose for a particular conviction.

Just because you are a racist and all around bigot, maybe you ought to research (something educated persons understand) before you post bullshit simply because your hate minorities and the majority of American Citizens who are socially liberal.
 
Again, irrelevant. It is not an if, the fact is guidelines were not followed. That is an objective fact.

Typical USMessageboard BS, make a claim and then run away from it with a bunch of side comments that have nothing to do with it.
Oh bullshit. Guidelines, bozo, are not rules. Only an idiot fails to comprehend the difference between what must be done and what is to be considered. However, bozo, every time Judge Jackson attempted to explain this simple fact, the Senators interrupted her over and over.

It's assholes like you who post BIG LIES, and BIG LIES permeate from each Republican Senator on the Committee on the Justice. Denial to allow Judge Jackson to respond to their leading questions is a kangaroo court.
 
Though impeachment is in the Constitution, it's pretty much moot when politicians care more for party than country.

.
STATEMENT: "Though impeachment is in the Constitution, it's pretty much moot when politicians care more for party than country."

RESPONSE: Well stated, McConnell and his bitches put the Republican Party and their careers twice when trump was impeached. Any honest person understood trump was guilty, and is the most corrupt person to ever hold the office of the presidency.
 
No, that is not the claim.

The claim is that she does NOT follow those sentencing guidelines. The gripe was that the sentence of 3 months for the case when was questioned on most was WAY below the guidelines.

The thread title is false.
True, the problem is she is black. Remember the BIG LIE that the Republican Party years ago as their talking point, the party of the big tent, and its hypocrisy became a mockery.
 
True, the problem is she is black. Remember the BIG LIE that the Republican Party years ago as their talking point, the party of the big tent, and its hypocrisy became a mockery.
Has any Senator on the committee said anything about her race?

No?

Then you are just a race baiting moron.
 
The woman follows the sentencing rules that Congress makes, even for crimes as terrible as child pornography. But that's bad according to the Republicans in the Senate Judiciary committee.

Is Jackson so damn perfect that this is the best the opposition could come up with?

She DOES NOT follow sentencing guidelines.

Sorry if OP was already told their post makes no sense. I did not read the whole thread.

SHE SENTENCED THE PEDOS TO 47% of the RECOMMENDED SENTENCE ON AVERAGE.

You owe Trump, $500k, you stupid whore.
 
Although prosecutors are not able to appeal a not guilty verdict, they are able to appeal when a judge hands down a criminal sentence that they do not believe meets the legal standards for what the law should impose for a particular conviction.

Just because you are a racist and all around bigot, maybe you ought to research (something educated persons understand) before you post bullshit simply because your hate minorities and the majority of American Citizens who are socially liberal.


:laughing0301::laughing0301: Poor little commie, an educated person knows the difference between "repeal" and "appeal". :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

.
 
Oh bullshit. Guidelines, bozo, are not rules. Only an idiot fails to comprehend the difference between what must be done and what is to be considered. However, bozo, every time Judge Jackson attempted to explain this simple fact, the Senators interrupted her over and over.

It's assholes like you who post BIG LIES, and BIG LIES permeate from each Republican Senator on the Committee on the Justice. Denial to allow Judge Jackson to respond to their leading questions is a kangaroo court.
Did I say they were rules? Did I say they had to be followed?

It's morons like you that make asinine assumptions about things that have not been said because everything must fit into your idiot partisan little world.

I challenged the false statement in the OP. And I did so with facts.

I care not that you are unable to comprehend that.
 
True, the problem is she is black. Remember the BIG LIE that the Republican Party years ago as their talking point, the party of the big tent, and its hypocrisy became a mockery.
Sure, everything must be racist because...

Well because you cannot think about anything but race. That is your problem, not every else.
 
STATEMENT: "Though impeachment is in the Constitution, it's pretty much moot when politicians care more for party than country."

RESPONSE: Well stated, McConnell and his bitches put the Republican Party and their careers twice when trump was impeached. Any honest person understood trump was guilty, and is the most corrupt person to ever hold the office of the presidency.


He wasn't near as guilty as the last POS POTUS you commies refused to convict.

.
 
True, the problem is she is black. Remember the BIG LIE that the Republican Party years ago as their talking point, the party of the big tent, and its hypocrisy became a mockery.


Why is it you commies keep bringing up skin color instead of addressing her irresponsible judicial actions? Like her reversal rate putting her in the bottom 36% of judges in her circuit..

While serving on the D.C. Circuit, Mrs. Jackson has authored only two written opinions, but she wrote nearly 500 orders as a federal district judge. According to my law firm’s research, the D.C. Circuit overturned her appealed decisions 11.9% of the time. Compared to the 21 current district judges on the D.C. District Court for whom data are available, Mrs. Jackson’s reversal rate rank places her in the bottom 36.4%.
Here's a hint for ya commie, that doesn't make her a great judge. Oh and there's more (from the same link):

One of Mrs. Jackson’s most prominent reversals was Make the Road New York v. Wolf. The D.C. Circuit panel concluded that Mrs. Jackson wrongly issued a nationwide injunction preventing the Trump administration from expanding the “Expedited Removal” program for noncitizens. The panel of mostly Democratic appointees reversed her decision on the basis that it lacked sufficient legal basis and concluded that she engaged in judicial “abuse of discretion.”

That makes her an activist judge. Evidently her ideology overrides her ivy league education.

.
 
So obviously the exact same thing can be said of everyone that slaves away in service to the legacy media.

pretty much. Question for you though. Is the Legacy Media different than the mainstream media?

I cannot keep up with all these new labels you people come up with each week
 

Forum List

Back
Top