Do we need some partisan blogger to tell us if the media has a bias?
Why not see what they have to say and gather facts from where ever we can and make our own decision. Or remember what they have said in the past and see how it worked out in reality?
For instance; the NYT allowed Judith Miller to publish Bush administration hand outs full of false claims to fan support for war in Iraq.
When Dan Rather reported on G.W. Bush's AWOL from the Texas Air National Guard the entire industry dumped on him. Where was the critical look at candidate Bush?
During labor disputes we hardly ever hear from the labor side.
Supporting Democrats is far from liberal. This is the party that gave us a president who destroyed our manufacturing base and signed the repeal to Glass-Seigal and set us up for the great recession.
Some liberal press we've got.
Umm, the Dan Rather Aur National Guard story was found to be a fake and Dan was fired as a result.
What was that about media bias again?
Your post is typically warfless.
But he was fired. If like you said the media is all liberal, why would they fire him?
Now take another situation on Fox News. A lady anchor says that Obama would fund Muslim groups during the government shutdown. Obviously a false statement. Did they correct it on air? Nope (Only on her twitter account). Did she get fired? Nope.
So the evil liberal media fired the person for making a false report and made the correction. The "Fair and Balanced" Fox News reporter makes a false report and no correction or the person fired.
Now which one again is the bias news source?
They fired him because the breach of journalistic ethics was so great they had no choice.
Your equivalence attempt is pathetic. I dont know what "lady anchor" (who talks like that? What difference does her gender make??) said what. But if she were speculation on what Obama would do that is commentary, not news. You do know the difference between opinion and fact, right? Oh, wait.