The mountain of evidence gets a little higher.

[berg80]

one other thing it is correct and it was a fine for taking money from charity ... Hillary was never charged with anything ...
The Uranium One Deal Was Not Clinton's to Veto or Approve Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating proposed foreign acquisitions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can't veto a transaction; only the president can.


All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton "never intervened" in committee matters. Clinton herself has said she wasn't personally involved.


There Is No Evidence That Uranium Went to Russia


That a change of company ownership occurred doesn't mean that 10 to 20 percent of America's uranium literally went to Russia. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ (Rosatom's mining subsidiary) is licensed to export uranium from the U.S. to other countries.


Some exports did occur, however.


A 2015 letter from NRC official Mark Satorius to a member of Congress revealed that an unspecified amount of yellowcake (semi-processed) uranium was shipped from a Uranium One facility in Wyoming to Canada between 2012 and 2014 for conversion (additional processing to prepare it for enrichment). A portion of that uranium was subsequently shipped to enrichment plants in Europe.


The transfers to Canada were legal despite Uranium One's not holding an export license because the NRC granted such a license to the company that transported it. The transfers to Europe were legal because they were approved by another agency, the U.S. Dept. of Energy. Satorius stressed that the transfers were subject to NRC oversight and all applicable safety and national security regulations:




Additionally, a small amount of that exported uranium was, in fact, sold to other countries. According to a 2 November 2017 article in The Hill, Uranium One officials acknowledged that approximately 25 percent of the yellowcake exported for conversion was subsequently sold via "book transfer" to customers in Western Europe and Asia (yellowcake being a fungible commodity, that doesn't necessarily translate to a physical transfer of the product, however).


To date, there is no evidence that any of this uranium made its way to Russia. An NRC spokesman cited by FactCheck.org in October 2017 reaffirmed Satorius's assurances that "the U.S. government has not authorized any country to re-transfer U.S. uranium to Russia." NRC officials also say they're unaware of any Uranium One exports from the U.S. to foreign countries since 2014.


The Timing of Most of the Clinton Foundation Donations Does Not Match Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion's share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company's Canadian founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.


Of the remaining individuals connected with Uranium One who donated to the Clinton Foundation, only one was found to have contributed during the same time frame that the deal was taking place, according to The New York Times — Ian Telfer (also a Canadian), the company's chairman:




In addition to the Clinton Foundation donations, the New York Times also cited a $500,000 speaking fee paid to former president Bill Clinton by a Russian investment bank in June 2010, before the Uranium One deal was approved:




The timing of Telfer’s Clinton Foundation donations and Bill Clinton's Renaissance Capital speaking fee might be questionable if there was reason to believe that Hillary Clinton was instrumental in the approval of the deal with Russia, but all the evidence points to the contrary — that Clinton did not play a pivotal role, and, in fact, may not have played any role at all. Moreover, neither Clinton nor her department possessed sole power of approval over said transaction.


Foundation Admits to Disclosure Mistakes One fault investigations into the Clinton Foundation's practices did find was that not all of the donations were properly disclosed — specifically, those of Uranium One Chairman Ian Telfer between 2009 and 2012. The foundation admitted this shortcoming and pledged to correct it, but as the Guardian pointed out in its May 2015 discussion of Clinton Cash, the fact that it happened is reason enough to sound alarm bells:




An enormous volume of interest and speculation surrounds the workings of the Clinton Foundation, which is to be expected. Given the enormous sums of money it controls and the fact that it is run by a former U.S. president who is married to a former U.S. secretary of state and presidential candidate, the foundation deserves all the scrutiny it gets, and more.


At the same time, for the sake of accuracy it's crucial to differentiate between partisan accusations and what we actually know about it — however little that may be.


Update


On 17 October 2017, The Hill reported obtaining evidence that Vadim Mikerin, a Russian official who oversaw the American operations of the Russian nuclear agency Rosatom, was being investigated for corruption by multiple U.S. agencies while the Uranium One deal was up for approval — information that apparently was not shared with U.S. officials involved in approving the transaction. The Hill also reported receiving documents and eyewitness testimony "indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow," although no specifics about who those Russian nuclear officials were or how the money was allegedly routed to the Clinton Foundation were given. In any case, none of these revelations prove that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton participated in a quid pro quo agreement to accept payment for approval of the Uranium One deal.

those are the fact not your made-up Breitbart bullshit stories

Sources​

I very much appreciate the rigor with which you approach topics. I take the same approach, backing up my assertions with factual material. It drives the rubes crazy.

 

[billyerock123]

Humans control access to the secure voting machines.

End of story.

You are right it’s a story all right … nobody has access To any voting machines …they are kept away from the public …they are checked by the people who made them … just before the starting of an election … it total bull shit you are trying to puysh here … they aren’t connect to anything no web access noting …just a machine that reads ballots and put the counts in the proper person’s count… that’s what don’t seem to get … stop you pushing if Elon Musks lies he like trump is a known liar …

 

[berg80]

it happened on her watch, so it's her responsibility

OMG. You're impervious to facts.

 

[billyerock123]

Have you heard Trumps latest lie … Trump has said at the January 6 insurrection??? he said he had more people then Martin Luther kings speech at the Washington mall … these Maga fools believe it …

 

[Faun]

That's funny right there. I'll put it in the same file that all the dems were leaving the country when Trump won in 2016.

Saying you'll do something and not doing it is not in the same ballpark as making a bet and not honoring it when you lose. Unlike the latter, there's no moral obligation to change your mind.

 

[Faun]

it happened on her watch, so it's her responsibility, you can post all the propaganda lies you have but the truth is the truth, Hillary Clinton is a traitor who should be in prison.

She had nothing to do with it.

 

[Delldude]

You are right it’s a story all right … nobody has access To any voting machines …they are kept away from the public …they are checked by the people who made them … just before the starting of an election … it total bull shit you are trying to puysh here … they aren’t connect to anything no web access noting …just a machine that reads ballots and put the counts in the proper person’s count… that’s what don’t seem to get … stop you pushing if Elon Musks lies he like trump is a known liar …

The people who made them do not stand guard over their machines, they ops check them, certify them and turn them over to whoever the officials are in that locale.
In locals where one party dominates, they usually have access and/or control over these machines. So absolutely no chance whatsoever no hanky panky would come into play.

 

[Delldude]

Saying you'll do something and not doing it is not in the same ballpark as making a bet and not honoring it when you lose. Unlike the latter, there's no moral obligation to change your mind.

Your pals are already lining up again.....'just in case'.