The New Terrorism Word Game: Have You Noticed It?

[jwoodie]

In an effort to avoid any connection between Islam and terrorism, we have now divided the latter into two categories: International terrorism and Domestic terrorism. According to these new definitions, a terrorist attack by a non-US citizen is a completely different type of event than an attack by a US citizen, even if both are perpetrated by radical Muslim jihadists. Isn't Political Correctness great?

 

[Contumacious]

In an effort to avoid any connection between Islam and terrorism, we have now divided the latter into two categories: International terrorism and Domestic terrorism. According to these new definitions, a terrorist attack by a non-US citizen is a completely different type of event than an attack by a US citizen, even if both are perpetrated by radical Muslim jihadists. Isn't Political Correctness great?

International and domestic "terrorism" actually RETALIATORY ATTACKS were motivated by:the fact that

In 1949 Harry S Truman deprived 1.5 million Muslims of their Homeland : Palestine

Since then the US has subsidized the Palestinian Holocaust to the tune of 130 BBBBBillion dollars per year


As we speak the US is in Syria methodically destroying that Country in order to allow Bibi to retain the Golan Heights and (2) make Israel the only powerhouse in the middle east


Now you understand that there is NO difference between international and domestic terrorism


.

.

 

[B. Kidd]

In an effort to avoid any connection between Islam and terrorism, we have now divided the latter into two categories: International terrorism and Domestic terrorism. According to these new definitions, a terrorist attack by a non-US citizen is a completely different type of event than an attack by a US citizen, even if both are perpetrated by radical Muslim jihadists. Isn't Political Correctness great?

Especially during election season.

 

[jwoodie]

there is NO difference between international and domestic terrorism

Exactly.

 

[Contumacious]

In an effort to avoid any connection between Islam and terrorism, we have now divided the latter into two categories: International terrorism and Domestic terrorism. According to these new definitions, a terrorist attack by a non-US citizen is a completely different type of event than an attack by a US citizen, even if both are perpetrated by radical Muslim jihadists. Isn't Political Correctness great?

Especially during election season.

Muslims are not a powerhouse in US domestic politics

They don't control the media therefore they have no rights the powers that be must recognize.


.

 

[SYTFE]

In an effort to avoid any connection between Islam and terrorism, we have now divided the latter into two categories: International terrorism and Domestic terrorism. According to these new definitions, a terrorist attack by a non-US citizen is a completely different type of event than an attack by a US citizen, even if both are perpetrated by radical Muslim jihadists. Isn't Political Correctness great?

Has absolute jack shit to do with "political correctness."

 

[jwoodie]

Has absolute jack shit to do with "political correctness."

You really shouldn't put your ignorance on display. Political correctness includes deceptive euphemisms to replace more accurate terms such as "Islamic terrorism."

 

[Contumacious]

Has absolute jack shit to do with "political correctness."

You really shouldn't put your ignorance on display. Political correctness includes deceptive euphemisms to replace more accurate terms such as "Islamic terrorism."

Actulally more accurate terms include state sponsored terrorism , ie, the US'

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

In an effort to avoid any connection between Islam and terrorism, we have now divided the latter into two categories: International terrorism and Domestic terrorism. According to these new definitions, a terrorist attack by a non-US citizen is a completely different type of event than an attack by a US citizen, even if both are perpetrated by radical Muslim jihadists. Isn't Political Correctness great?

Everyone’s noticed that you and most others on the right continue to attempt to exploit unwarranted fear of ‘terrorism’ for some perceived partisan gain.

Not every criminal act is an act of ‘terrorism.’

Conservatives are as ridiculous as they are wrong, dashing about shouting ‘terrorism’ absent the facts as to whether or not an actual act of terrorism occurred – and you do so in bad faith only to foment more fear to use as a political weapon against your opponents.