JoeB131
Diamond Member
essential to the purity of both
Then he should have wrote that in there unambigiously...
The reason he probably didn't was because you had all the puritans in the northern colonies who wouldn't have ratified it if they thought he was dissin' God.
So he wrote something kind of vague about "establishment of religion", and called it a day.
What does that even mean?
Does it mean that Congress can't make any laws that apply to a religion? Nobody tell the Branch Davidians.
Or does it mean they just can't establish a state religion.
He told you want he meant you jsut dont like it because you dont really like the constitution
Doesn't matter what he "meant", it matters what he 'wrote', guy.
What he wrote was kind of ambiguous.
He wrote what he thought the guys who did believe in Sky Pixies would agree to. Not what he might have wanted as a Deist.