Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #261
James Madison cleared up what he meant nearly two hundered years ago in that letter you clown
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
James Madison cleared up what he meant nearly two hundered years ago in that letter you clown
Are you no longer the Moral party or not?
NO ONE is the Moral Party.....including yours.....they both will fuck you behind your back and think nothing of it....
TM is clearly referring to Newt's insistence that "family values" are the determining factor in a candidate's fitness for office.
Umm..That is Madison's OPINION.....Not the law of the land.the father of our constitution says that separation of church and state is in the constitution that he wrote.
Yet the right claims its not for political gain.
They LIE about our constitution and the man who wrote it and then claim they are all about the constitution.
They just never stop lying.
Tel ya what...You go find in the US Constitution where 'separation of church and state' is specific or those words even appear.
You are prohibited from use of the word 'lie' or 'liar'.
You use this term as a weapon as a last resort. Or whenever you have no come back.
Think of something else......for once.
The word 'rifle' doesn't appear in the constitution but I'll bet you believe the constitution protects your right to keep and bear one.
No... Bing Crosby...Your bullshit interpitations of what the constitution says are twarted by the man who wrote it
are "TWARTED?".....who the hell taught you English?.....Norm Crosby?....![]()
Thwarted. Big deal.
I appreciate the few who appear to be able to stick to the topic instead of these mindless attacks on the poster.
you are claiming I lied.
I quoted madison to prove my point.
Hes not good enough for you?
Ironically, most conservatives are obsessed with 'originalism', or original intent, which relies wholly on what the founders believed or said they believed about the constitution.
I just dont understand such duplicity.
I dont understand what they think they gain by playing this game.
Dont they understand people come to these sites and look and not talk.
Do they think being such brick brained hypocrits wins them votes?
Conservatives start with a conclusion, and then work backwards to concoct an argument that supports their conclusion.
can you last posters tell us what Madison meant ?
in a heartbeat if you get in the way of thier re-elction.NO ONE is the Moral Party.....including yours.....they both will fuck you behind your back and think nothing of it....
Harry, correct his spelling, OK? Thanks.![]()
It's too bad that there's not an off-topic area for your "contributions" Radio.![]()
Yup. Sucks to be you.
I think it must STBY, actually. You want to participate, but you don't really know how.
Really?!!!!Umm..That is Madison's OPINION.....Not the law of the land.the father of our constitution says that separation of church and state is in the constitution that he wrote.
Yet the right claims its not for political gain.
They LIE about our constitution and the man who wrote it and then claim they are all about the constitution.
They just never stop lying.
Tel ya what...You go find in the US Constitution where 'separation of church and state' is specific or those words even appear.
You are prohibited from use of the word 'lie' or 'liar'.
You use this term as a weapon as a last resort. Or whenever you have no come back.
Think of something else......for once.
The word 'rifle' doesn't appear in the constitution but I'll bet you believe the constitution protects your right to keep and bear one.
it says Congress cant stand in the way of someone establishing A Religion and practicing it.....where does it say that Church and State should never interact?.....thats what Radio is asking you......why do you hate the English Language?....Are you trying to suggest the man who wrote it did not know what he was talking about?
Madison offered his opinion. It ends right there.
Thwarted. Big deal.
I appreciate the few who appear to be able to stick to the topic instead of these mindless attacks on the poster.
be got beat hours ago and just cant win with facts and ideas so he merely insults like a child.
He doesnt have the class to amitt he was wrong.
very few cons do.
the left isnt telling me anything , I go by the facts.
How many in this thread have admitted what I clearly showed which is what the Father of the constitution said about the first amendment which he fucking wrote?
NOT ONE
Now you are lying as Radioman schooled you.
why would anyone be a part of a party that has no legs to stand on so they deny history, science, definitions of words and in so doing end up spitting on the father of the constitution as well as the constitution?
man all they have to do is side with the facts and dump a failed party.
They cant do it , how sad.