The "No Evidence" Crowd Seems To Have Become Silent

Status
Not open for further replies.

"POLL: MOST VOTERS STILL BELIEVE CHEATING CHANGED THE OUTCOME OF THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

View attachment 651051
Nearly two years after the 2020 presidential election, voters remain doubtful about the legitimacy of the 2020 election.

55 percent of likely U.S. voters believe cheating changed its outcome, a recent Rasmussen poll shows. The survey was conducted across 1,000 likely U.S. voters on May 23-24. Only 39 percent of respondents overall indicated that cheating did not affect the election.

When broken down by political party, most Republicans and Independents expressed doubts over the fairness of the highly debatable election. However, Democrats did not.

Congratulations on joining the useful idiots. They also polled that in 2003 a majority of people thought that Saddam Hussein had WMD's, and was responsible for 9-11.
 

A Washington Post poll conducted two years after 9/11 dramatically illustrated the story: 69% of Americans at the time believed Saddam Hussein was “personally” involved in the 9/11 attack. Even more staggering, 82% believed Saddam provided assistance to Osama bin Laden. Both were utterly false.
 
Congratulations on joining the useful idiots. They also polled that in 2003 a majority of people thought that Saddam Hussein had WMD's, and was responsible for 9-11.
Difference being that those 2003 polls were after a massive media disinformation/propaganda machine driving those numbers....Today's poll numbers are despite and in the face of that propaganda machine.

Sucks to be you.
 
Last edited:
Difference being that those 2003 polls were after a massive media disinformation/propaganda machine drivin those numbers....Today's poll numbers are despite and in the face of them.

Sucks to be you.
Trump, Mike Lindel, Rudy Giuliani et al, had been running a disinformation campaign for the last two years.
Technically for the last 6 years, since the roots of the "illegitimate election" claims started in 2016.
 
oooo....Half a dozen, versus hundreds of thousands of documented fake/fraudulent votes for your senile, pants-shitting basement dummy.

I'm convinced! :auiqs.jpg:
Documented fake/fraudulent votes? Documented by who? Mike Lindel, who says that he's got the evidence to put 300 million people in jail?
 
Trump, Mike Lindel, Rudy Giuliani et al, had been running a disinformation campaign for the last two years.
Technically for the last 6 years, since the roots of the "illegitimate election" claims started in 2016.
shortbusjump.jpg
 
So be specific. What changes did PA male and how did it make for a fraudulent count?
They make the claim that only the legislature can change election laws/rules. Yet the law also says that votes cast legally at the time, they were counted, still count. Even if the rule or law under which they were allowed was later changed or invalidated.
 
Griffin v. Burns, a 1978 decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit

The 1st Circuit, affirming the federal district court, held that the retroactive invalidation of what were otherwise properly cast absentee ballots, on the basis of a new legal interpretation of state law unannounced before the election, was a violation of the voters’ federal due process rights.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top