Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was correctly voted on, decided, and certified.Here comes the knife through where your heart would be if you had one.
Just because a series of corrupt courts.....including the 'supreme' one.....wouldn't hear the evidence doesn't mean there wasn't clear and dispositive evidence.
I can provide it.
The fact is that the only document that Americans have agreed to be governed by is the Constitution. It is written in English….no ‘interpretation’ is required. Wherein we find this:
Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”
McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)
supreme.justia.com
But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes
Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?redstate.com
Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.
Why do you keep parroting lies?
If you can find it, an HBO film called "Hacking Democracy" talks about how easy it is to hack voting machines.
It was correctly voted on, decided, and certified.
Why do you keep parroting lies?
Legislatures determined voting rules.
Pa. Supreme Court weighs future of state’s popular mail voting law
A group of Republican lawmakers — some of whom voted for the law — now say no-excuse mail voting requires a change to the Pennsylvania Constitution.www.spotlightpa.org
Jack would understand that if he had the brains which he doesn't, or the desire, which he doesn't. Jack is just another mind-numbing mouthpiece for the socialist agenda who can't see the hand in front of his face because he is paid not to see.
Legislatures set rules for voting..in accordance with states right to conduct their elections in the manner they see fit. All passing Constitutional muster. Republicans voted for these rule changes. Why are you complaining about them now?..because your savior lost? Too bad. Deal with it.So you and the Democrats no longer follow the United States Constituition.
Exactly what I have always said: you are traitors, and the enemies of America.
Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”
McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)
supreme.justia.com
Does the Constitution say that or not?
Legislatures set rules for voting..in accordance with states right to conduct their elections in the manner they see fit. All passing Constitutional muster. Republicans voted for these rule changes. Why are you complaining about them now?..because your savior lost? Too bad. Deal with it.
Legislatures set rules for voting..in accordance with states right to conduct their elections in the manner they see fit. All passing Constitutional muster. Republicans voted for these rule changes. Why are you complaining about them now?..because your savior lost? Too bad. Deal with it.
Then why were so many rule changes for 2020 not approved through the legislatures?Legislatures set rules for voting..
See fit? Then why were all the changes made in secret court sessions behind closed doors with no public involvement? Why were they begun in December 2019 then the public told it was all because of Covid?in accordance with states right to conduct their elections in the manner they see fit.
WHICH constitution? Proof?All passing Constitutional muster.
If a few did, so what?Republicans voted for these rule changes.
Same reason as for the past 16 months. Crimes do not go away with the passage of time just because YOU keep trying to wish them away!Why are you complaining about them now?..
You mean like in 2016 the way you dealt with it Jack?because your savior lost? Too bad. Deal with it.
The rule changes WERE approved by legislatures...try and keep up here. There were no secret court sessions. Only legislatures can approve changes to state voting rules...which they did...willingly.Then why were so many rule changes for 2020 not approved through the legislatures?
See fit? Then why were all the changes made in secret court sessions behind closed doors with no public involvement? Why were they begun in December 2019 then the public told it was all because of Covid?
WHICH constitution? Proof?
If a few did, so what?
Same reason as for the past 16 months. Crimes do not go away with the passage of time just because YOU keep trying to wish them away!
You mean like in 2016 the way you dealt with it Jack?
View attachment 622354
The rule changes WERE approved by legislatures...try and keep up here. There were no secret court sessions. Only legislatures can approve changes to state voting rules...which they did...willingly.
I dealt with Trump winning in 2016 just fine Freaky. HE on the other hand, did a bang up job of continually sabotaging his own Presidency...all with NO help from me.
BTW, stop posting selfies. 1.5 years is a LONG time to hold a scream.
WRONG. Better check again Jack.The rule changes WERE approved by legislatures...
WRONG. How many did you know about at the time they happened? None?There were no secret court sessions.
You still on Tramadol?I dealt with Trump winning in 2016 just fine Freaky.
The rule changes WERE approved by legislatures...try and keep up here. There were no secret court sessions. Only legislatures can approve changes to state voting rules...which they did...willingly.
I dealt with Trump winning in 2016 just fine Freaky. HE on the other hand, did a bang up job of continually sabotaging his own Presidency...all with NO help from me.
BTW, stop posting selfies. 1.5 years is a LONG time to hold a scream.
Not familiar with a Constituton.You lying scum.
The Constituton forbids any but the elected legislature from altering dates and times.
There is no basis for that extension in state law. The state supreme court made that up, and it is not allowed by the Constitution of the United States.
A state court authorized it, and it does not have the authority under the US Constitution.
Not familiar with a Constituton.
And you missed the whole point about the legislatures changing the voting laws..which they did. Ergo, you have NOTHING to complain about.
unsplash.com
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?
Karma is already beginning to attack Joe.
He sprained his ankle yesterday playing with his dog 'Major'!
I just love karma, don't you?
