The Obama administration is off to a great start!

[WillowTree]

1.) The only conning the Republicans do is con the American people. The nomination of Sarah Palin is proof of that.

2.) I know what I stand for thanks. I gave Bush a chance to prove me wrong despite the fact I later found out he stole the election. But hey, I guess you think I was some radical socialist pinko at 9 huh?

3.) Nice link, too bad it's only a wacky Republican who also happens to hate Liberals.

4.) What kind of petard was I hoisted upon? The only one hoisted upon anything is your dumb ass hoisted back up on the stupidity tree after falling and hitting every branch on the way down.

You have no solution, face it; your useless as Dubya was to our foreign policy and everything else.

Gee, I swear arguing with some of you republicans is like a battle of wits; except you and others are unarmed.

5.) Besides, did you really think John "The Fundamentals of the Economy are strong" McCain and Sarah "I have foreign policy experience because Russia is near Alaska" Palin is better?

How fucking desperate is all I have to say on that.

well then little nimrod, you got all the answers, how's about stop asking us for answers.. let us relax and set about our name calling, finger flipping, mockery and thwartiness for at least four years, hell, get's bad enough I might even crawl out into the boggy ditch and thrust out my "I'm sorry" sign to the rest of the world. Kerry on little nimrod,, Kerry on.

 

[Modbert]

well then little nimrod, you got all the answers, how's about stop asking us for answers.. let us relax and set about our name calling, finger flipping, mockery and thwartiness for at least four years, hell, get's bad enough I might even crawl out into the boggy ditch and thrust out my "I'm sorry" sign to the rest of the world. Kerry on little nimrod,, Kerry on.

You sure you aren't a boxer Willow?

Since all you do is duck, dodge, and weave.

 

[WillowTree]

You sure you aren't a boxer Willow?

Since all you do is duck, dodge, and weave.

couldbewhozetosay?

 

[Tech_Esq]

1.) The only conning the Republicans do is con the American people. The nomination of Sarah Palin is proof of that.

You stupid Dems....still wringing your hands over Sarah Palin. You are so freaking terrified you can't see straight. Well, we have a few years to see if your fear is justified. Maybe your prescient, who knows.

2.) I know what I stand for thanks. I gave Bush a chance to prove me wrong despite the fact I later found out he stole the election. But hey, I guess you think I was some radical socialist pinko at 9 huh?

If you'll check your reading comprehension, you'll notice I allowed for the fact that you might be the exception from that dumbass. But then again, maybe it's just a convenient artifice you're using to deflect attack.

3.) Nice link, too bad it's only a wacky Republican who also happens to hate Liberals.

I find no support for your contention that he's a Republican. His view point is clearly on the right though. Anyone with a brain hates Liberals. I hope you didn't mean to prove anything by that.

4.) What kind of petard was I hoisted upon? The only one hoisted upon anything is your dumb ass hoisted back up on the stupidity tree after falling and hitting every branch on the way down.

Sorry, guess you're too stupid to understand.

You have no solution, face it; your useless as Dubya was to our foreign policy and everything else.

Not my useless W. Our useless W. I liked about as much as you, probably for different reasons though.

Gee, I swear arguing with some of you republicans is like a battle of wits; except you and others are unarmed.

You're so dumb, I bet you really do think you won, don't you?

5.) Besides, did you really think John "The Fundamentals of the Economy are strong" McCain and Sarah "I have foreign policy experience because Russia is near Alaska" Palin is better?

John sucked just like George sucked, just like Bob sucked, just like George sucked. One worse than the next.

How fucking desperate is all I have to say on that.

I'll bet it isn't. I'll bet you still want to say more stuff to prove how smart you think you are. Well, go on, prove you're not the moron this post makes you seem like.

I forgot to give your props.....your counted to 5

 

[Modbert]

You stupid Dems....still wringing your hands over Sarah Palin. You are so freaking terrified you can't see straight. Well, we have a few years to see if your fear is justified. Maybe your prescient, who knows.



If you'll check your reading comprehension, you'll notice I allowed for the fact that you might be the exception from that dumbass. But then again, maybe it's just a convenient artifice you're using to deflect attack.



I find no support for your contention that he's a Republican. His view point is clearly on the right though. Anyone with a brain hates Liberals. I hope you didn't mean to prove anything by that.



Sorry, guess you're too stupid to understand.




Not my useless W. Our useless W. I liked about as much as you, probably for different reasons though.



You're so dumb, I bet you really do think you won, don't you?



John sucked just like George sucked, just like Bob sucked, just like George sucked. One worse than the next.



I'll bet it isn't. I'll bet you still want to say more stuff to prove how smart you think you are. Well, go on, prove you're not the moron this post makes you seem like.

I forgot to give your props.....your counted to 5

Sarah Palin is just the most recent example. Do I need to bring up ol Danny boy?

From your post, you already had seem to judged me far beforehand.

His view point is right-wing, I looked at some of his articles.

Yes, he was our useless president, however I can least say I didn't vote for him. Not sure if you did.

With what I bolded, I'm sure you either meant you counted or your counting. I only bring up this because it's ironic you make such a mistake after a sentence talking about intelligence.

 

[indago]

 

[007]

" Change we CAN'T believe in "

Sure... there's change... change BACK to the peanut farmer president days of total liberal aberrations and anomalies.

Today Commie Comrade Pelosi took care of the Republican's stripping them of many rights. Hey, nothing like a fair voice in your nations capital and halls of justice.

It's her version of the Fairness Doctrine. She can say and do what she wants but conservatives can't. Yup... it says that's fair in her liberal hand book on page 4.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Just a question, what's the Republicans solution to this?

"this"? If "THIS" is the economic problems caused by government intervention and overspending on fuiture social policy failures... The solution is to remove government intervention from the market place, CUT SPENDING and shut down the aforementioned pending social policy failures.

There's nothing complex about it.

Look... Leftist policy is counter productive; take the move of early 20th century Progressives who created the Fed... They created the fed to prevent economic collapse, right? What was the near immediate result of their policy to prevent economic collapse?... Why Economic COLLAPSE, of course.

Markets ebb and flow and there is nothing the Fed or the left can or will ever do to stop this from happening... Where there is good weather, time will bring bad weather; where there is light, darkness will follow; hot precedes cold; plenty of time, a lack of time and so on... that is the nature of... NATURE. All the ideological left will EVER do with their insipid notions of regulating nature is to make matters worse and this is WITHOUT EXCEPTION.

So the solution to THIS problem is the solution to most problems... take the leftist out of the equation and the problem is solved and if it is NOT solved, finding the solution is made exponentially less complex.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Balancing the budget is not what anyone sane is arguing about as we enter 2009. maybe you need to get out more?

ROFL... Of COURSE NOT! Because 'balancing the budget' was what you idiots were crying about when BUSH was in office... Now that you have the reigns of power, there is going to be NO TALK of such.

It's long been a JOKE that progressives, such as yourself were found weeping about 'spending'... and everywhere I've found such, I've quickly pointed out that you idiots aren't concerned int he slightest with over spending. Not ONE leftist has EVER been found discussing the federal governments need to cut spending from other programs, such as the unconstitutional social programs, where and when it was necessary to increase spending on national defense.

When the US was forced to take the battle to the terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan... WHAT PROGRESSIVE came to the floor and demanded that cuts needed to be made elsewhere to accommodate the increases in national defense spending? ROFLMNAO... NOT ONE! Not even CLOSE!

What we'll see now is massive spending which will greatly exceed that spent in the GWOT and that spending will of course lead to economic disaster... it is as certain as the sun rise.

 

[RodISHI]

A sad day for me as I say maybe I should have accepted that round table invatation to the Republican party's party in years past. I rarely say "I should have." Yet by what I see today I really should have.

Common sense went out the door when we cannot get together and help work these problems out in a bipartisan manner that will benefit everyone in the long term.

Toss out the childish bantering out of the political parties and get down to business or there will be little left for either party to party over.

 

[WillowTree]

ROFL... Of COURSE NOT! Because 'balancing the budget' was what you idiots were crying about when BUSH was in office... Now that you have the reigns of power, there is going to be NO TALK of such.
It's long been a JOKE that progressives, such as yourself were found weeping about 'spending'... and everywhere I've found such, I've quickly pointed out that you idiots aren't concerned int he slightest with over spending. Not ONE leftist has EVER been found discussing the federal governments need to cut spending from other programs, such as the unconstitutional social programs, where and when it was necessary to increase spending on national defense.

When the US was forced to take the battle to the terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan... WHAT PROGRESSIVE came to the floor and demanded that cuts needed to be elsewhere to accommodate the increases in national defense spending? ROFLMNAO... NOT ONE! Not even CLOSE!

What we'll see now is massive spending which will greatly exceed that spent in the GWOT and that spending will of course lead to economic disaster... it is as certain as the sun rise.

Snort!

 

[WillowTree]

A sad day for me as I say maybe I should have accepted that round table invatation to the Republican party's party in years past. I rarely say "I should have." Yet by what I see today I really should have.

Common sense went out the door when we cannot get together and help work these problems out in a bipartisan manner that will benefit everyone in the long term.

Toss out the childish bantering out of the political parties and get down to business or there will be little left for either party to party over.

too little too late!

 

[WillowTree]

bipartisan and comprehensive are both words that should be scrapped!

 

[editec]

It’s drizzling on Obama’s post-election honeymoon | csmonitor.com



I guess being a community organizer and a member of a Senate committee means Obama's never had to a do a budget before. Someone should tell him the goal is to balance that budget, or at least cut the deficit, not extend it. Even Sarah Palin knows that. I guess that's where executive experience comes in handy.

Somebody needs to read their history.

The goal is to balance the budget? In a period of DEFLATION?!?

You don't appear to have a clue what is going on, J.

Remember how, before this meltdown started I was all hot and bothered to increase taxes on the billionaires?

Not now, I'm not.

What's that tell you?

Apparently nothing at all.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Just a question, what's the Republicans solution to this?

Last I checked the Republicans are not in charge anymore. And also as I recall when they were in charge the Liberals like you INSISTED that democrats had nothing to do with anything.

So enjoy being in charge and getting blamed for all the wrong decision YOU make.

If the Budget does call for 1 trillion over revenue in, I suggest you all admit you are a BIG part of the problem.

 

[Truthmatters]

It seems to me that republicans have a worse record on balencing budgets than Dems do.

Go look at all the numbers from the last 30 years.

Rs increase the deficit well over dems.


Bush and the republican party create a god awful mess of this country and then balme Obama for it before he even has any control?

Damn can you guys get any more dishonest?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Almost none of the legislation the Democrats attempted to introduce made it out of committee, therefore while the Republicans were in charge the years that Bush/Cheney had their hands around the throats of the Republicans (which still mystifies me...why did they put up with it?) the Republicans fucked over the country as much as they possibly could.

And how do you explain 2006 to 2008? The Democrats were in charge then, or the 2 years before that when the Senate was run by democrats?

 

[Ravi]

And how do you explain 2006 to 2008? The Democrats were in charge then, or the 2 years before that when the Senate was run by democrats?

The Republicans obstructed.

 

[Truthmatters]

And how do you explain 2006 to 2008? The Democrats were in charge then, or the 2 years before that when the Senate was run by democrats?

VETO POWER!!!!!!!!!


Grab a little honesty once in awhile.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Oh okay, so you guys are calling yourselves no better then the "Liberals" of eight years ago. Therefore supposedly, according to your own definitions; you would be traitors,etc.

Funny, I least waited til Bush royally fucked up this country until I disliked him. You all haven't even let Obama take office yet.

And it must be the republican complex with the whole messiah thing (Conservatives seem to talk an awful lot about religion anyway) since I have not seen a Liberal call him the messiah yet.

But alright, I understand it completely now. You have no solution. Neither you or the Republican party. And it's not like you can blame Obama's for life problems yet. Have to wait 15 days for that.

You were 9 years old when Bush was first elected and only 13 the second time, You had no stance on issues at all. But go ahead and dazzle os with that life's experience you have SO much of.

4 of the last 8 Years the DEMS controlled parts of or all of Congress. And they had no solutions then, just as now. They approved every budget that had deficits in it those 4 years, they approved every penny spent on the war also. Further they actively BLOCKED any oversight on the Housing market.

And all the Dems have said for 8 years is they weren't in charge, don't blame us, we have no input, we are not to blame, it is all Bush's fault. Now you want to know what our solutions are, why? Cause yours are not the answer. You guys are running things, face the facts, trying to divert attention from your failed or going to fail policies by claiming a minority party is to blame will not sell. Ohh and you don't get to claim it is all Bush's fault anymore either.

Learn to fucking lead.