Good article.
The author falls all over himself to explain that he's still with the MSM agenda, but...
And that destroys every argument that has been advance in this thread so far."As a legal matter, even if jurors find parts of Zimmerman's story fishy, that is not enough to convict.
Even if they believe that Zimmerman initiated the altercation, and that his injuries were relatively minor, that too would be insufficient evidence to convict.
Prosecutors have to effectively disprove self defense beyond a reasonable doubt."
Anyone believe the farce the prosecution put on last week in any way disproved self defense beyond a reasonable doubt?
The author of the article did not.
Yeah, but none of these yahoos will read it, what with ABC being a "rightwing news organization" and all...
![]()
Hey! Who you calling a yahoo? I read everything he posts