pioneerpete
VIP Member
- Jun 26, 2013
- 1,043
- 82
- 83
Getting to Murder 2: Finding George Zimmerman?s ?Depraved Mind?
Florida defines murder in the second degree as:
The unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated by any act imminently dangerous to another and evincing a depraved mind regardless of human life, although without any premeditated design to effect the death of any particular individual, is murder in the second degree . . .
Floridas standard jury instruction for murder 2 notes that:
An act is imminently dangerous to another and demonstrating a depraved mind if it is an act or series of acts that:
1.a person of ordinary judgment would know is reasonably certain to kill or do serious bodily injury to another, and
2.is done from ill will, hatred, spite, or an evil intent, and
3.is of such a nature that the act itself indicates an indifference to human life.
Notice step 2. Under Florida law the mere fact that an armed man kills another who is unarmed does not prove a depraved mind (Poole v. State, Bellamy v. State, and Light v. State). Typically, the prosecution proves ill will, hatred, spite, or an evil intent through evidence of a long-standing grievance or some unusually wrongful or aggressive conduct on the part of the attacker.
1. Saying these words doesn't make here
2. These words don't describe his intent, ill will, hatred and spite are involved in the act itself.
3. If these words do that then every person in Florida traffic meets this standard.
I am leaning that he does not qualify for Murder2. I would have to read the Manslaughter charge to see if he fits in there.
Law of Self Defense ? Zimmerman Trial: If State can?t get murder 2, can they get manslaughter? Yes . . . and no
To clearly understand the issue, however, we need to take a step back, and consider what the State actually has to accomplish in this case (or, really, any self-defense case).
(1) They need to prove each and every element of a criminal chargeeither murder 2 or manslaughterbeyond a reasonable doubt.
(2) They have to disprove any single element of the legal defense of self-defense-beyond a reasonable doubt.
Ive mentioned theres no way the State can prove murder 2. Manslaughter, however, should be a walk in the park. All thats really required of the state is to prove (a) Zimmerman deliberately used force against Martin, and (b) Martin died as a result (Im simplifying of course, but you get the idea).
Even if the state can prove the elements of manslaughter beyond a reasonable doubtand I believe they canthey still need to overcome Zimmermans claim of self defense if they wish to obtain a conviction on that charge.
Unless the State can disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury must conclude that Zimmerman did, in fact, act in self-defense. Because self-defense is an absolute justification for the use of deadly force against another, it matters not a whit if the elements of either murder 2 or manslaughter have been proven 2 beyond a reasonable doubtthe verdict must be Not Guilty.