Rat in the Hat
Gold Member
- Mar 31, 2010
- 21,949
- 6,020
- 198
Der beez one gud thing bout dis witnisss.
He beez gibbin me da chance ta gets sum lawndry dun.![thup :thup: :thup:](/styles/smilies/thup.gif)
He beez gibbin me da chance ta gets sum lawndry dun.
![thup :thup: :thup:](/styles/smilies/thup.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't get the judge's ruling about excluding the animation at all.
Why would any judge build in such a solid appeals argument (in the unlikely event of a conviction)?
I am less concerned with the exclusion of texts showing that TM may have been fond of fighting. Again, I doubt GZ was AWARE of TM's proclivities, so it may very well be a whole lot on the irrelevant side.
But the animation ruling is absurd.
We're trying to cheer up about injustice here.
And get off page 666
I've been on a jury. The two times we were sent back for something to be decided, the following testimony was, "exciting" I guess is the word.
This guy is boring as hell. The jury has to be wondering what the issue was with this, since they have no idea about the animation and text issues.
Mr Stamina might give the jury (and us) a little hint as to where he is going with the questioning.
Mr. Stamina can do whatever he wants, thank you! He always has a point.
I am less concerned with the exclusion of texts showing that TM may have been fond of fighting. Again, I doubt GZ was AWARE of TM's proclivities, so it may very well be a whole lot on the irrelevant side.
.
First < 167 567 617 657 665 666 (667)
I don't get the judge's ruling about excluding the animation at all.
Why would any judge build in such a solid appeals argument (in the unlikely event of a conviction)?
I am less concerned with the exclusion of texts showing that TM may have been fond of fighting. Again, I doubt GZ was AWARE of TM's proclivities, so it may very well be a whole lot on the irrelevant side.
But the animation ruling is absurd.
We're trying to cheer up about injustice here.
And get off page 666
I'm only on page 250...but I'm willing to help
The jury has got to be sitting there thinking "THIS is what we left early for yesterday?".
If you're ever called to be a juror, note that those large periods where you're sitting in the jury room is when you're missing all the good stuff.
How many people do you have on 'ignore'?
I have my preference set to 40 posts per page.
How many people do you have on 'ignore'?
I have my preference set to 40 posts per page.
Der beez one gud thing bout dis witnisss.
He beez gibbin me da chance ta gets sum lawndry dun.![]()
The jury has got to be sitting there thinking "THIS is what we left early for yesterday?".
If you're ever called to be a juror, note that those large periods where you're sitting in the jury room is when you're missing all the good stuff.
I am not going to say a word about what happens at sidebar, much less what we do in chambers... I would get disbarred if I told.
How many people do you have on 'ignore'?
I have my preference set to 40 posts per page.
Then you are immediately disqualified from the 10,000th post contest--sorry--Judge Debbie says so.