The Progs will DENY SCIENCE when it comes to record snowfalls, that havent happened like this over 100 years.

[ding]

The effects of 400 ppm in the atmosphere.

View attachment 410362

Is obsessive compulsive delusionary disorder fun?

Is that what you have?

 

[ReinyDays]

Sorry can't talk right now. I am getting a little light headed from all the CO2 pollution I am inhaling.

... or CH4 ...

 

[westwall]

Poop isn't

How can CO2 be pollution when it is a vital part of the carbon cycle?

Poop is as natural as natural can be ... when it covers the streets of Los Angeles 3 feet thick ... it's pollution ...

We used to use our rivers as open sewers ... poop right in them ... well, more peoples and that didn't work very well ... now we're using our atmosphere as a sewer and maybe that's also not such a good idea ... think 30 billion fully electrified ...

Poop isn't CO2. It does have carbon locked in it but it has to be broken down to be useful.

CO2 is usable without processing.

 

[ding]

Can you believe they intentionally put pollution in sodas?

 

[ding]

I had to let my house burn down because my fire extinguisher is filled with pollutants.

 

[ReinyDays]

Poop isn't CO2. It does have carbon locked in it but it has to be broken down to be useful.

CO2 is usable without processing.

I think you have that backwards ... the carbon in CO2 is said to be fully oxidized, see the two oxygens? ... that is it's lowest energy state at environmental temperatures ... poopy carbon is bonded to other carbons, hydrogen, some nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur, few other things ... this carbon is said to be reduced, which is a higher energy state ...

Reduced carbon is a precious resource ... 3rd Law of Thermodynamics predicts this higher energy carbon will seek it's oxidized state and lower energy ... and a pile of poop is chuck full of reduced carbon ... we can smell it ... what atmospheric oxygen don't get, the bacteria will ... a pile of poop is a seething mass of microbes ... "One man gathers what another man [poops]" ...

Oxidized carbon must first pass through the photosynthesis pathway ... CO2 + sunlight --> reduced carbon + O2 ... only then is it vital and can be joined to other carbon atoms into proteins ...

Carbon is poop is already unlocked and available for use ... it is CO2 that must be processed to be usable ...

( ... and you don't know shit ... )

 

[ding]

There may come a time when they intentionally release methane into the atmosphere and they won't call it pollution. They will call it a Hail Mary.

 

[ding]

... it is CO2 that must be processed to be usable ...

Do you think plants are picky eaters?

 

[esalla]

The effects of 400 ppm in the atmosphere.

View attachment 410362

Is obsessive compulsive delusionary disorder fun?

Are you having fun?

Hell yea

 

[esalla]

What about forest fires and volcanoes?

The CO2 from forest fires would carry the Carbon-13 signature, it has been circulating in the atmosphere high enough to get ZAPPED and gain a neutron ... say within the past million years or so ... still part of the natural 280 ppm ... and there have been volcanoes all along, so those would also be included in the natural 280 ppm and I don't think it's all that much ...

Not a trace of Carbon-13 in the remaining 125 ppm ... like the stuff has been buried for millions of years never reaching the upper atmosphere ... and that's why we're boiling the oceans off typing all this crap in ...

Pollution ...

I'm actually holding my breath so I don't pollute the atmosphere. I'm channeling James Nestor as we speak.

LOL do not worry, you will never set foot on a spacecraft or submarine, but you might find yourself in a cave collecting bat guano for your weed farm.

Yawn

LOL was I not supposed to mention the weed farm?

The quiet is deafening

Given your dire prediction concerning atmospheric CO2 pollution, I'd be surprised if I survived the night, Frannie.

When did I mention atmospheric CO2 pollution?

Oh yea I forgot, you have that delusional disorder thing

My bad

When you said CO2 was pollution, Francis.

Are you claiming that CO2 is not a pollutant that can cause a range of human effects culminating in death?

CO2 affects human health at lower levels than previously thought

Exposure to carbon dioxide (CO2) poses direct risks to human health at lower levels than previously thought, research has found. Reviewing current studies on the subject, American academics concluded that exposure to ambient CO2 in indoor environments can have harmful…

airqualitynews.com

The researchers cited mounting evidence that CO2 levels as low as 1,000ppm can cause health problems, even if people are only exposed to them for an hour or two.

They found that CO2 levels exceeding 1,000ppm have already been observed in crowded and poorly ventilated rooms such as classrooms, offices and bedrooms as well as air-conditioned public transport and planes – all places where humans can spend several hours at a time.

Collating the findings of numerous studies, the academics summarised that acute exposure to high CO2 levels can have ‘adverse health outcomes’, citing studies which observed inflammation and reduced cognitive performance above 1,000ppm.

Chronic exposure to levels between 2,000ppm and 3,000ppm can have even worse impacts as this was linked to effects including kidney calcification and bone demineralisation.

The team behind the study warned that human CO2 exposure may be a growing problem in the coming years as projections suggest that by 2100 outdoor CO2 levels in some cities could exceed 1,000ppm for parts of the year.

‘Continuous exposure to increased atmospheric CO2 could be an overlooked stressor of the modern and/or future environment,’ the study suggested.

The researchers concluded by saying further research is needed to find ways to mitigate exposure to indoor CO2, especially for children and vulnerable people, and to fully understand its potential health effects.

I am claiming you are an idiot to be discussing it with CO2 at 400 ppm.

Why when the only person here to even mention 400 ppm CO2 is you. But at least this means that you now accept that you are an idiot.

You really spent time learning how to humiliate yourself?

Or you just like me as much as the Bureau did?

 

[esalla]

The effects of 400 ppm in the atmosphere.

View attachment 410362

Is obsessive compulsive delusionary disorder fun?

Is that what you have?

I have Apple Google Netflix and around 800 others

You?

 

[ding]

What about forest fires and volcanoes?

The CO2 from forest fires would carry the Carbon-13 signature, it has been circulating in the atmosphere high enough to get ZAPPED and gain a neutron ... say within the past million years or so ... still part of the natural 280 ppm ... and there have been volcanoes all along, so those would also be included in the natural 280 ppm and I don't think it's all that much ...

Not a trace of Carbon-13 in the remaining 125 ppm ... like the stuff has been buried for millions of years never reaching the upper atmosphere ... and that's why we're boiling the oceans off typing all this crap in ...

Pollution ...

I'm actually holding my breath so I don't pollute the atmosphere. I'm channeling James Nestor as we speak.

LOL do not worry, you will never set foot on a spacecraft or submarine, but you might find yourself in a cave collecting bat guano for your weed farm.

Yawn

LOL was I not supposed to mention the weed farm?

The quiet is deafening

Given your dire prediction concerning atmospheric CO2 pollution, I'd be surprised if I survived the night, Frannie.

When did I mention atmospheric CO2 pollution?

Oh yea I forgot, you have that delusional disorder thing

My bad

When you said CO2 was pollution, Francis.

Are you claiming that CO2 is not a pollutant that can cause a range of human effects culminating in death?

CO2 affects human health at lower levels than previously thought

Exposure to carbon dioxide (CO2) poses direct risks to human health at lower levels than previously thought, research has found. Reviewing current studies on the subject, American academics concluded that exposure to ambient CO2 in indoor environments can have harmful…

airqualitynews.com

The researchers cited mounting evidence that CO2 levels as low as 1,000ppm can cause health problems, even if people are only exposed to them for an hour or two.

They found that CO2 levels exceeding 1,000ppm have already been observed in crowded and poorly ventilated rooms such as classrooms, offices and bedrooms as well as air-conditioned public transport and planes – all places where humans can spend several hours at a time.

Collating the findings of numerous studies, the academics summarised that acute exposure to high CO2 levels can have ‘adverse health outcomes’, citing studies which observed inflammation and reduced cognitive performance above 1,000ppm.

Chronic exposure to levels between 2,000ppm and 3,000ppm can have even worse impacts as this was linked to effects including kidney calcification and bone demineralisation.

The team behind the study warned that human CO2 exposure may be a growing problem in the coming years as projections suggest that by 2100 outdoor CO2 levels in some cities could exceed 1,000ppm for parts of the year.

‘Continuous exposure to increased atmospheric CO2 could be an overlooked stressor of the modern and/or future environment,’ the study suggested.

The researchers concluded by saying further research is needed to find ways to mitigate exposure to indoor CO2, especially for children and vulnerable people, and to fully understand its potential health effects.

I am claiming you are an idiot to be discussing it with CO2 at 400 ppm.

Why when the only person here to even mention 400 ppm CO2 is you. But at least this means that you now accept that you are an idiot.

You really spent time learning how to humiliate yourself?

Or you just like me as much as the Bureau did?

I think it is awesome that you made the leap that CO2 is a pollutant by arguing toxicity when atmospheric CO2 is at 400 ppm.

 

[ding]

The effects of 400 ppm in the atmosphere.

View attachment 410362

Is obsessive compulsive delusionary disorder fun?

Is that what you have?

I have Apple Google Netflix and around 800 others

You?

I'm retired.

You?

 

[esalla]

The effects of 400 ppm in the atmosphere.

View attachment 410362

Is obsessive compulsive delusionary disorder fun?

Is that what you have?

I have Apple Google Netflix and around 800 others

You?

I'm retired.

You?

I am too young to be retired, when I do I will be a full time trader when not in triathlon training

Enjoy rotting

 

[ding]

The effects of 400 ppm in the atmosphere.

View attachment 410362

Is obsessive compulsive delusionary disorder fun?

Is that what you have?

I have Apple Google Netflix and around 800 others

You?

I'm retired.

You?

I am too young to be retired, when I do I will be a full time trader when not in triathlon training

Enjoy rotting

I guess your investments aren't as great as you think they are then.

 

[esalla]

What about forest fires and volcanoes?

The CO2 from forest fires would carry the Carbon-13 signature, it has been circulating in the atmosphere high enough to get ZAPPED and gain a neutron ... say within the past million years or so ... still part of the natural 280 ppm ... and there have been volcanoes all along, so those would also be included in the natural 280 ppm and I don't think it's all that much ...

Not a trace of Carbon-13 in the remaining 125 ppm ... like the stuff has been buried for millions of years never reaching the upper atmosphere ... and that's why we're boiling the oceans off typing all this crap in ...

Pollution ...

I'm actually holding my breath so I don't pollute the atmosphere. I'm channeling James Nestor as we speak.

LOL do not worry, you will never set foot on a spacecraft or submarine, but you might find yourself in a cave collecting bat guano for your weed farm.

Yawn

LOL was I not supposed to mention the weed farm?

The quiet is deafening

Given your dire prediction concerning atmospheric CO2 pollution, I'd be surprised if I survived the night, Frannie.

When did I mention atmospheric CO2 pollution?

Oh yea I forgot, you have that delusional disorder thing

My bad

When you said CO2 was pollution, Francis.

Are you claiming that CO2 is not a pollutant that can cause a range of human effects culminating in death?

CO2 affects human health at lower levels than previously thought

Exposure to carbon dioxide (CO2) poses direct risks to human health at lower levels than previously thought, research has found. Reviewing current studies on the subject, American academics concluded that exposure to ambient CO2 in indoor environments can have harmful…

airqualitynews.com

The researchers cited mounting evidence that CO2 levels as low as 1,000ppm can cause health problems, even if people are only exposed to them for an hour or two.

They found that CO2 levels exceeding 1,000ppm have already been observed in crowded and poorly ventilated rooms such as classrooms, offices and bedrooms as well as air-conditioned public transport and planes – all places where humans can spend several hours at a time.

Collating the findings of numerous studies, the academics summarised that acute exposure to high CO2 levels can have ‘adverse health outcomes’, citing studies which observed inflammation and reduced cognitive performance above 1,000ppm.

Chronic exposure to levels between 2,000ppm and 3,000ppm can have even worse impacts as this was linked to effects including kidney calcification and bone demineralisation.

The team behind the study warned that human CO2 exposure may be a growing problem in the coming years as projections suggest that by 2100 outdoor CO2 levels in some cities could exceed 1,000ppm for parts of the year.

‘Continuous exposure to increased atmospheric CO2 could be an overlooked stressor of the modern and/or future environment,’ the study suggested.

The researchers concluded by saying further research is needed to find ways to mitigate exposure to indoor CO2, especially for children and vulnerable people, and to fully understand its potential health effects.

I am claiming you are an idiot to be discussing it with CO2 at 400 ppm.

Why when the only person here to even mention 400 ppm CO2 is you. But at least this means that you now accept that you are an idiot.

You really spent time learning how to humiliate yourself?

Or you just like me as much as the Bureau did?

I think it is awesome that you made the leap that CO2 is a pollutant by arguing toxicity when atmospheric CO2 is at 400 ppm.

CO2 is a health damaging and or fatal pollution and toxin. Always was, not sure why you have a 400 ppm fetish

 

[esalla]

The effects of 400 ppm in the atmosphere.

View attachment 410362

Is obsessive compulsive delusionary disorder fun?

Is that what you have?

I have Apple Google Netflix and around 800 others

You?

I'm retired.

You?

I am too young to be retired, when I do I will be a full time trader when not in triathlon training

Enjoy rotting

I guess your investments aren't as great as you think they are then.

Neither is your cooks pension from Taco Bell, but if it keeps you in beans.............................

Eventually everyone gets out out to pasture.

So is waiting to die fun?

 

[ding]

What about forest fires and volcanoes?

The CO2 from forest fires would carry the Carbon-13 signature, it has been circulating in the atmosphere high enough to get ZAPPED and gain a neutron ... say within the past million years or so ... still part of the natural 280 ppm ... and there have been volcanoes all along, so those would also be included in the natural 280 ppm and I don't think it's all that much ...

Not a trace of Carbon-13 in the remaining 125 ppm ... like the stuff has been buried for millions of years never reaching the upper atmosphere ... and that's why we're boiling the oceans off typing all this crap in ...

Pollution ...

I'm actually holding my breath so I don't pollute the atmosphere. I'm channeling James Nestor as we speak.

LOL do not worry, you will never set foot on a spacecraft or submarine, but you might find yourself in a cave collecting bat guano for your weed farm.

Yawn

LOL was I not supposed to mention the weed farm?

The quiet is deafening

Given your dire prediction concerning atmospheric CO2 pollution, I'd be surprised if I survived the night, Frannie.

When did I mention atmospheric CO2 pollution?

Oh yea I forgot, you have that delusional disorder thing

My bad

When you said CO2 was pollution, Francis.

Are you claiming that CO2 is not a pollutant that can cause a range of human effects culminating in death?

CO2 affects human health at lower levels than previously thought

Exposure to carbon dioxide (CO2) poses direct risks to human health at lower levels than previously thought, research has found. Reviewing current studies on the subject, American academics concluded that exposure to ambient CO2 in indoor environments can have harmful…

airqualitynews.com

The researchers cited mounting evidence that CO2 levels as low as 1,000ppm can cause health problems, even if people are only exposed to them for an hour or two.

They found that CO2 levels exceeding 1,000ppm have already been observed in crowded and poorly ventilated rooms such as classrooms, offices and bedrooms as well as air-conditioned public transport and planes – all places where humans can spend several hours at a time.

Collating the findings of numerous studies, the academics summarised that acute exposure to high CO2 levels can have ‘adverse health outcomes’, citing studies which observed inflammation and reduced cognitive performance above 1,000ppm.

Chronic exposure to levels between 2,000ppm and 3,000ppm can have even worse impacts as this was linked to effects including kidney calcification and bone demineralisation.

The team behind the study warned that human CO2 exposure may be a growing problem in the coming years as projections suggest that by 2100 outdoor CO2 levels in some cities could exceed 1,000ppm for parts of the year.

‘Continuous exposure to increased atmospheric CO2 could be an overlooked stressor of the modern and/or future environment,’ the study suggested.

The researchers concluded by saying further research is needed to find ways to mitigate exposure to indoor CO2, especially for children and vulnerable people, and to fully understand its potential health effects.

I am claiming you are an idiot to be discussing it with CO2 at 400 ppm.

Why when the only person here to even mention 400 ppm CO2 is you. But at least this means that you now accept that you are an idiot.

You really spent time learning how to humiliate yourself?

Or you just like me as much as the Bureau did?

I think it is awesome that you made the leap that CO2 is a pollutant by arguing toxicity when atmospheric CO2 is at 400 ppm.

CO2 is a health damaging and or fatal pollution and toxin. Always was, not sure why you have a 400 ppm fetish

Because you are arguing CO2 is a pollutant in the atmosphere, dummy.

The only reason CO2 was labeled a pollutant by the GOVERNMENT was to be able to apply the clean air act to CO2 to regulate it.

 

[ding]

The effects of 400 ppm in the atmosphere.

View attachment 410362

Is obsessive compulsive delusionary disorder fun?

Is that what you have?

I have Apple Google Netflix and around 800 others

You?

I'm retired.

You?

I am too young to be retired, when I do I will be a full time trader when not in triathlon training

Enjoy rotting

I guess your investments aren't as great as you think they are then.

Neither is your cooks pension from Taco Bell, but if it keeps you in beans.............................

Eventually everyone gets out out to pasture.

So is waiting to die fun?

You need to see it that way because you are feeling beaten.

You couldn't even figure out how to put air in a tire with a presta valve.

 

[esalla]

What about forest fires and volcanoes?

The CO2 from forest fires would carry the Carbon-13 signature, it has been circulating in the atmosphere high enough to get ZAPPED and gain a neutron ... say within the past million years or so ... still part of the natural 280 ppm ... and there have been volcanoes all along, so those would also be included in the natural 280 ppm and I don't think it's all that much ...

Not a trace of Carbon-13 in the remaining 125 ppm ... like the stuff has been buried for millions of years never reaching the upper atmosphere ... and that's why we're boiling the oceans off typing all this crap in ...

Pollution ...

I'm actually holding my breath so I don't pollute the atmosphere. I'm channeling James Nestor as we speak.

LOL do not worry, you will never set foot on a spacecraft or submarine, but you might find yourself in a cave collecting bat guano for your weed farm.

Yawn

LOL was I not supposed to mention the weed farm?

The quiet is deafening

Given your dire prediction concerning atmospheric CO2 pollution, I'd be surprised if I survived the night, Frannie.

When did I mention atmospheric CO2 pollution?

Oh yea I forgot, you have that delusional disorder thing

My bad

When you said CO2 was pollution, Francis.

Are you claiming that CO2 is not a pollutant that can cause a range of human effects culminating in death?

CO2 affects human health at lower levels than previously thought

Exposure to carbon dioxide (CO2) poses direct risks to human health at lower levels than previously thought, research has found. Reviewing current studies on the subject, American academics concluded that exposure to ambient CO2 in indoor environments can have harmful…

airqualitynews.com

The researchers cited mounting evidence that CO2 levels as low as 1,000ppm can cause health problems, even if people are only exposed to them for an hour or two.

They found that CO2 levels exceeding 1,000ppm have already been observed in crowded and poorly ventilated rooms such as classrooms, offices and bedrooms as well as air-conditioned public transport and planes – all places where humans can spend several hours at a time.

Collating the findings of numerous studies, the academics summarised that acute exposure to high CO2 levels can have ‘adverse health outcomes’, citing studies which observed inflammation and reduced cognitive performance above 1,000ppm.

Chronic exposure to levels between 2,000ppm and 3,000ppm can have even worse impacts as this was linked to effects including kidney calcification and bone demineralisation.

The team behind the study warned that human CO2 exposure may be a growing problem in the coming years as projections suggest that by 2100 outdoor CO2 levels in some cities could exceed 1,000ppm for parts of the year.

‘Continuous exposure to increased atmospheric CO2 could be an overlooked stressor of the modern and/or future environment,’ the study suggested.

The researchers concluded by saying further research is needed to find ways to mitigate exposure to indoor CO2, especially for children and vulnerable people, and to fully understand its potential health effects.

I am claiming you are an idiot to be discussing it with CO2 at 400 ppm.

Why when the only person here to even mention 400 ppm CO2 is you. But at least this means that you now accept that you are an idiot.

You really spent time learning how to humiliate yourself?

Or you just like me as much as the Bureau did?

I think it is awesome that you made the leap that CO2 is a pollutant by arguing toxicity when atmospheric CO2 is at 400 ppm.

CO2 is a health damaging and or fatal pollution and toxin. Always was, not sure why you have a 400 ppm fetish

Because you are arguing CO2 is a pollutant in the atmosphere, dummy.

The only reason CO2 was determined by the GOVERNMENT was to be able to apply the clean air act to regulate it.

Pollution is pollution anyplace that the levels get too high. CO2 as such qualifies as pollution, and a fatal one in many instances. Not sure why you reject this, but you can prove me wrong by shutting yourself in a garage and cooking