The Right To Destroy Jewish History

RE: The Right To Destroy Jewish History
SUBTOPIC: An Alternate Reality
※→ et al,


This is another reason people should consider the UN General Assembly a corrupt, manipulative, and obsolete international body.


b7dznoAz_normal.png

Liza Rosen said:
Muslim countries in the UN along with China and Russia passed a resolution at UNESCO (the UN's world heritage organization) which "deletes" the historical connection of Jews and Christians to Jerusalem's holy sites. According to UNESCO, only Muslims have a historic connection to Jerusalem, because Muslim countries formed a majority and passed this bizarre resolution.

(COMMENT)

Anytime the UN attempts to rewrite history, it can be considered entangled in an illusion.
https://x.com/LizaRosen0000
The US should slowly disengage from the Anti-Semitic body. The Muslim Religion is slightly less than 1400 years old. King David acquired Jerusalem some (≈) 3000 BC or 5000 years ago.

Any such attempt merely demonstrates just how ignorant these nations are.

....
1718926424684.png

.. ..
......
1718926447117.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 


Israeli Prime Minister calls out the ICJ after the court said Israel should relocate 700,000 of its citizens from the Judea and Samaria (West Bank), claiming those living there are ‘illegal’ and demanding Israel pays ‘reparations’ to Palestinians.

Netanyahu issued a statement reacting to the court saying:

“The Jewish people are not occupiers in their own land, including in our eternal capital Jerusalem nor in Judea and Samaria, our historical homeland.
No absurd opinion in the Hague can deny this historical truth or the legal right of Israelis to live in their own communities in our ancestral home.”
 


Israeli Prime Minister calls out the ICJ after the court said Israel should relocate 700,000 of its citizens from the Judea and Samaria (West Bank), claiming those living there are ‘illegal’ and demanding Israel pays ‘reparations’ to Palestinians.

Netanyahu issued a statement reacting to the court saying:

“The Jewish people are not occupiers in their own land, including in our eternal capital Jerusalem nor in Judea and Samaria, our historical homeland.
No absurd opinion in the Hague can deny this historical truth or the legal right of Israelis to live in their own communities in our ancestral home.”


The Dem voters in Minnesota and Michigan are against you.
 
Here's some history for you, the history from New York Post June 1948 where the militant Zionists spent millions on a campaign to boycott UK goods and services, the country that not only fought the Nazis but liberated Jews from certain death and bent over backwards to get Israel established.

1721771471676.png

This is the real face of Zionism, unadulterated rapacity, greed, pursuit of the fanatical dream of dominating the Levant. People today make calls to boycott Israel and they get attacked, they get called antisemites, they get shutdown and lose their jobs.

That ad wasn't simply Jews calling for a boycott, it was very specifically militant Zionists, those who hate traditional Jews as much as they hate anything that dares to question their quest for middle east domination.
 
Last edited:
RE: The Right To Destroy Jewish History
SUBTOPIC:
⁜→ Sixties Fan, et al,

This is rediculous!


Muslim countries in the UN along with China and Russia passed a resolution at UNESCO (the UN's world heritage organization) which "deletes" the historical connection of Jews and Christians to Jerusalem's holy sites. According to UNESCO, only Muslims have a historic connection to Jerusalem, because Muslim countries formed a majority and passed this bizarre resolution.
(COMMENT)

This UNESCO nonsense does not apply to the (
generally fraudulent) Pro-Palestinians and Anti-Israeli claims. This example of UNESCO manipulative law is merely an example of corruption under the color of law.

Article 24 • Part 3 - General Principles of Criminal Law • Rome Statutes International Criminal Court said:
Non-retroactivity ratione personae

1. No person shall be criminally responsible under this Statute for conduct prior to the entry into force of the
Statute.
2. In the event of a change in the law applicable to a given case prior to a final judgement, the law more
favourable to the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted shall apply.
Article 28 - Non-Retroactivity of Treaties • Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties said:
Article 28 Non-retroactivity of treaties Unless a different intention appears from the treaty or is otherwise established, its provisions do not bind a party in relation to any act or fact which took place or any situation which ceased to exist before the date of the entry into force of the treaty with respect to that party.
(Excerpts) "The principle of retroactivity of recognition was regarded as restricted to matters within the effective control of the new government." •••
"Retroactivity of recognition operates to validate acts of a de facto Government which has subsequently become the new de jure Government, and not to invalidate acts of the previous de jure Government."
International Law • Eighth Edition © Malcolm N. Shaw 2017 University Printing House, One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006,
1721782410595.png

1721782444193.png
Most Respectfully,
R
 
The Iraqi denaturalization law, which allowed Jews to sign away their citizenship in exchange for the right to emigrate, came into effect on March 9, 1950. It expired one year later, on March 8, 1951.

Of the five bombings often mentioned in explorations of this period, only two occurred during the registration period. The three others came after its expiration. The sequence, dates, and locations of the explosions are as follows:

  • Explosion 1: On April 8, 1950, an explosive device was thrown on Abu Nuwas Street near the al-Baida café, which was frequented by Jews.
  • Explosion 2: On January 14, 1951, a grenade was thrown at the Masuda Shemtob synagogue.
  • Explosion 3: On March 19, 1951, the United States Information Service building, which was frequented by Jews, was bombed.
  • Explosion 4: On May 10, 1951, a bomb exploded at the office of the Jewish-owned Lawee automobile company.
  • Explosion 5: On June 5, 1951, a bomb exploded near a building owned by Jewish businessman Stanely Shaashua.
It helps to visualize registration milestones alongside the dates of the explosions, as in the following graph (click to expand):



The final piece of the puzzle is responsibility for the bombs.

At one point in the book, Shlaim suggests Israel and Iraqi Zionists were “behind the Baghdad bombings” in toto. He later begrudgingly admits, citing what he characterizes as “flimsy” evidence, that an antisemitic Arab nationalist group called Istiqlal was likely responsible for Explosion 1. He insists that, though in Arab with an anti-Jewish grudge tossed the second bomb, Jews were actually the hidden hand behind Explosion 2. And he places responsibility for Explosions 3, 4, and 5 on Yosef Basri, a member of the Zionist underground in Iraq.

In contrast with the “flimsy” evidence about Explosion 1, Shlaim insists he has “undeniable proof of Zionist involvement” in what he calls “the terrorist attacks that helped to terminate two and a half millennia of Jewish presence in Babylon.”


Zionist Jews gather in Baghdad, 1951
Even if we were to accept Shlaim’s indictments, the graph shows that the Jewish community had disintegrated long before Explosion 2—the earliest of Shlaim’s Zionist bombs. By the time of this Jan 1951 incident, about 86,000 Jews—8 in 10 of those who would register, and well over half of the Jewish community—had already committed to leaving Iraq.

(full article online)


 

Forum List

Back
Top