The science ISNT settled!!!

skookerasbil

Platinum Member
Aug 6, 2009
37,970
6,393
1,140
Not the middle of nowhere
"Incredible analysis of the failure of the models!!!:2up: The climate religion.........all they do is count on these bogus models!! Its all about follow the $$$.....incredible levels of corruption!!!:bye1: Its not science........its never been. Its climate hypothesis!!! Income Redistribution is the goal, not the advancement of science. Wiping out western civilization leaves more resources for the elites.

The Science Isn't Settled: A Response to the Climate Change Crybullies (Short Version)

And something that made me laugh......."only 3% of the public are very concerned about climate change".
 
PS......anybody with half a brain needs only to take a moment to think about whats really going on when ANYBODY who challenges the climate science industry gets sued!!:ack-1:. You speak out against the established narrative with these people, the response is hostile 100% of the time!!! At every Climate Summit, those who bring research findings that don't conform with the "97%" are PROHIBITED from presenting their findings!!:spinner:

This is supposed to be science.............think about that.............:coffee:
 
There is a way to address this "issue" without the antagonism that is currently going back and forth.

The Political Right should respond as follows:

  • Assume the earth is getting warmer; ignore the reasons why. They are debatable.
  • Commit to a campaign to optimize the efficiency of all machinery currently fueled by burning carbon; a by-product of this campaign would be to reduce global CO2 emissions.
  • Optimize the use of non-CO2 burning sources of energy (nuclear, solar, wind, tidal, geothermal, hydro), to the extent that they promise to be economically viable in the foreseeable future.
  • Examine the probable and possible effects of atmospheric warming, and develop engineering solutions to each problem that is identified. And while we're at it...
  • Start a major global initiative to bring the benefits of technological modernity (clean water, good sanitation, reliable and cheap electricity, internet access, etc) to the third and developing world. And if it means that Somalia will be generating more CO2 emissions, well, people are more important that imaginary bogeymen.
 
There is a way to address this "issue" without the antagonism that is currently going back and forth.

The Political Right should respond as follows:

  • Assume the earth is getting warmer; ignore the reasons why. They are debatable.
  • Commit to a campaign to optimize the efficiency of all machinery currently fueled by burning carbon; a by-product of this campaign would be to reduce global CO2 emissions.
  • Optimize the use of non-CO2 burning sources of energy (nuclear, solar, wind, tidal, geothermal, hydro), to the extent that they promise to be economically viable in the foreseeable future.
  • Examine the probable and possible effects of atmospheric warming, and develop engineering solutions to each problem that is identified. And while we're at it...
  • Start a major global initiative to bring the benefits of technological modernity (clean water, good sanitation, reliable and cheap electricity, internet access, etc) to the third and developing world. And if it means that Somalia will be generating more CO2 emissions, well, people are more important that imaginary bogeymen.
Technology for petroleum free energy has been around since the days of Tesla and is being used in the deep underground military bases. Magnetic energy is another technology that has come a long way....but your beloved "gubermint" that you have such child like faith in that is pushing global warming has been suppressing that type of technology along with 6,000 other patents many of which would provide cheap, green energy
 
There is a way to address this "issue" without the antagonism that is currently going back and forth.

The Political Right should respond as follows:

  • Assume the earth is getting warmer; ignore the reasons why. They are debatable.
  • Commit to a campaign to optimize the efficiency of all machinery currently fueled by burning carbon; a by-product of this campaign would be to reduce global CO2 emissions.
  • Optimize the use of non-CO2 burning sources of energy (nuclear, solar, wind, tidal, geothermal, hydro), to the extent that they promise to be economically viable in the foreseeable future.
  • Examine the probable and possible effects of atmospheric warming, and develop engineering solutions to each problem that is identified. And while we're at it...
  • Start a major global initiative to bring the benefits of technological modernity (clean water, good sanitation, reliable and cheap electricity, internet access, etc) to the third and developing world. And if it means that Somalia will be generating more CO2 emissions, well, people are more important that imaginary bogeymen.

And yet clean coal fired plants exist today and you rabid left wits are killing them. Why? Its cheep, Its clean, and its abundant, Its reliable.. again why are you killing it? IF your reason is CO2 then you need think again. We could burn every fossil fuel on earth and not affect the climate.

The earth has survived over 7,000ppm for billions of years without a runaway green house effect.. That alone disproves the CO2 meme like a sledge hammer does to plate glass.
 
49 degree F for today in Chicago. Monday it was 83 as the high. Hmm, if CO2 were the cause, why would the temperature eva go down? I mean all that back radiation shit that is in the air that is stronger than the sun. Please any of you warmers, why is it only going to 49 as the high today? Please, I want the magic CO2, ours is no good. I mean, how many fking cars do you think are on the roads here spewing carbon monoxide into the air? All that added CO2 due to the Catalytic convertors. I call bullshit on CO2.
 
There is a way to address this "issue" without the antagonism that is currently going back and forth.

The Political Right should respond as follows:

  • Assume the earth is getting warmer; ignore the reasons why. They are debatable.
  • Commit to a campaign to optimize the efficiency of all machinery currently fueled by burning carbon; a by-product of this campaign would be to reduce global CO2 emissions.
  • Optimize the use of non-CO2 burning sources of energy (nuclear, solar, wind, tidal, geothermal, hydro), to the extent that they promise to be economically viable in the foreseeable future.
  • Examine the probable and possible effects of atmospheric warming, and develop engineering solutions to each problem that is identified. And while we're at it...
  • Start a major global initiative to bring the benefits of technological modernity (clean water, good sanitation, reliable and cheap electricity, internet access, etc) to the third and developing world. And if it means that Somalia will be generating more CO2 emissions, well, people are more important that imaginary bogeymen.


Kewl........or we can just go with the 97%er theory as taken from a handful of scientists.......... start spending mega-amounts of money to wreck economies all along being 100% certain it will solve the problem!!!:eusa_dance::2up::2up: That thinking is far more astute!!:rock:
 
49 degree F for today in Chicago. Monday it was 83 as the high. Hmm, if CO2 were the cause, why would the temperature eva go down? I mean all that back radiation shit that is in the air that is stronger than the sun. Please any of you warmers, why is it only going to 49 as the high today? Please, I want the magic CO2, ours is no good. I mean, how many fking cars do you think are on the roads here spewing carbon monoxide into the air? All that added CO2 due to the Catalytic convertors. I call bullshit on CO2.


JC....still freezing our balls off here in southern New York just a couple of days ahead of May.:gay:Heavy sweatshirt weather......but I remember back in the early 90's before the cooling we had a day in early May where it was 95 degree's:funnyface:
 
There is a way to address this "issue" without the antagonism that is currently going back and forth.

The Political Right should respond as follows:

  • Assume the earth is getting warmer; ignore the reasons why. They are debatable.
  • Commit to a campaign to optimize the efficiency of all machinery currently fueled by burning carbon; a by-product of this campaign would be to reduce global CO2 emissions.
  • Optimize the use of non-CO2 burning sources of energy (nuclear, solar, wind, tidal, geothermal, hydro), to the extent that they promise to be economically viable in the foreseeable future.
  • Examine the probable and possible effects of atmospheric warming, and develop engineering solutions to each problem that is identified. And while we're at it...
  • Start a major global initiative to bring the benefits of technological modernity (clean water, good sanitation, reliable and cheap electricity, internet access, etc) to the third and developing world. And if it means that Somalia will be generating more CO2 emissions, well, people are more important that imaginary bogeymen.
Technology for petroleum free energy has been around since the days of Tesla and is being used in the deep underground military bases. Magnetic energy is another technology that has come a long way....but your beloved "gubermint" that you have such child like faith in that is pushing global warming has been suppressing that type of technology along with 6,000 other patents many of which would provide cheap, green energy


That is correct........yet the k00ks keep pushing this assanine solar and wind energy that are expensive as hell.:spinner:
 

Forum List

Back
Top