Respectfully disagree. Evidence underwhelming.Then start looking at the evidence and stop listening to the world. I made my wealth in science and I fully support a young earth. The evidence is overwhelming.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Respectfully disagree. Evidence underwhelming.Then start looking at the evidence and stop listening to the world. I made my wealth in science and I fully support a young earth. The evidence is overwhelming.
I’ll give you a quick Geology 101 lesson.Respectfully disagree. Evidence underwhelming.
The problem is when scientists rely far too much on computer models of dubious quality.That is interesting but not an "oops" incident. New discoveries with the WST will be continuously made and new models will be made and broken. That is consistent with the history of progress in all the sciences.
No, climate change research is 99% based on computer models of PROVENClimate change involves science. It's the acceptance of climate change that involve politics.
I can easily understand the politics of astronomy. Particle accelerators are also in short supply. I have seen lots of politics involved in trying to get time on a accelerator. Politics seems to enter everywhere there is a competition for a limited resource.
Yes, rock bends, some geologic processes can indeed happen very quickly, but they require events of extraordinary power to occur.You probably don’t know time is not a constant.
Nor know geologic formations can occur in a few years that we are told took millions. Nor does rock bend.
Oil does not form in a couple thousand years. Everest did not rise up in the last 100,000 years. I cannot subscribe.I’ll give you a quick Geology 101 lesson.
At any layer ever exposed in the world no where has a river ever been found. You should see evidence somewhere of a river existing.
View attachment 977346
View attachment 977350
It’s a cross section. You should see river valleys. Yet there are none in the world. The dramatic layers you see are from the flood. It’s the only explanation on why drastic layers exist.
Don’t think so?
View attachment 977351
Is this an ancient rock formation?
Nope, it’s after a decade of the Mt St Helen’s eruption.
Folded rocks. All those layers had to be mud, rock doesn’t bend.
View attachment 977356
View attachment 977357
Yes, rock bends. Takes millions of years. I AM a geologist. Your claims are well proven to be wrong.I’ll give you a quick Geology 101 lesson.
At any layer ever exposed in the world no where has a river ever been found. You should see evidence somewhere of a river existing.
View attachment 977346
View attachment 977350
It’s a cross section. You should see river valleys. Yet there are none in the world. The dramatic layers you see are from the flood. It’s the only explanation on why drastic layers exist.
Don’t think so?
View attachment 977351
Is this an ancient rock formation?
Nope, it’s after a decade of the Mt St Helen’s eruption.
Folded rocks. All those layers had to be mud, rock doesn’t bend.
View attachment 977356
View attachment 977357
Of course it does. Rock will bend. Sea fossils on the top of everest.Yes, rock bends. Takes millions of years. I AM a geologist. Your claims are well proven to be wrong.
If those layers you point to were merely mud when formed, they would not have remained layered, they would have been compressed into a mixed melange with no layers at all.
Trust me, I know.Of course it does. Rock will bend. Sea fossils on the top of everest.
That is interesting but not an "oops" incident. New discoveries with the WST will be continuously made and new models will be made and broken. That is consistent with the history of progress in all the sciences.