The Supreme Court Of The United States Is Guilty Of Subornation Of Perjury

[Sixties Fan]

Vote for Democrats and support their money laundering and sex trafficking.

Any evidence of any of those accusations?
Because even Trump court appointed Judges will throw any of that out of their courts in a second.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
The SCOTUS allowed individuals to illegal discriminate against a whole section of society.
That violates the 14th amendment of the Constitution.
That puts all minorities at risk, including conservatives.

There was nothing illegal about it and it puts no one at risk

It violates no part of the constitution liar

 

[Soupnazi630]

I do not really care about "standing" or not, since it is a wide principle.
But to allow arbitrary discrimination is just incredibly stupid because everyone is a minority in some way.
This allows people to refuse service to conservatives.

Yes every individual is a minority and every individual has the right to discriminate which harms NO ONE

 

[bripat9643]

What a wonderful fantasy land you live in.

People who have never worked, and have not paid into SS and Medicare, DO NOT get those benefits after 65.

Kvetch some more.

Sure they do. Are you saying widows who never worked don't collect Social Security?

 

[Soupnazi630]

They not only violated their trust, but their basic belief in the general concepts of law, and will be guilty of murder for all the millions of deaths this will eventually cause.
So they will die if this gets to that point in their lifetime.
They will pay for their crime.

This will not cause one murder much less multiple

They will be hailed as a greast court as fools like you are laughed into obscurity

 

[Soupnazi630]

Once the precedent of illegal and harmful discrimination is at all allowed, it is only a matter of time before signs get put up banning religions, political affiliation, etc.
And there can be no doubt that would end in violent civil war.

There is no such thing as illegal or harmful discrimination.

There has never been and never will be a war over iindividual choice

 

[Rawley]

Not only does this put all minorities at risk, but it forces society to fracture into tiny polarized groups who selfishly only work for themselves and no longer cohesively work for the benefit of the rights of everyone.
That is not just how you end up with the Krystal Nacht, but Roman circuses as well.

So you will no longer ever work with any conservatives?

 

[Rigby5]

You have proof of this claims? Why didn't the dissenting justices raise the issue?

Standing does not really matter that much once it gets to the SCOTUS, since what they have to decide is whether previous rulings by lower courts were wrong or not, regardless of original standing.

And the basic question is whether or not businesses can be allowed to discriminate at will.
And it seems obvious that would destroy society completely.
Do you really want businesses owned by democrats to not allow republican customers?
That would ensure mass violence.
Within a few decades, the whole society would devolve into civil war.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

A right wing extremist, Lorie Smith, was thinking about creating websites. Lorie Smith also wanted her 15 minutes of fame, so she created a company called 303 Creative and then filed a lawsuit claiming that a gay couple known as Stewart and Mike had demanded she create a web site for them. This lawsuit ended up at the Supreme Court, and it overturned years of legal precedent which made discrimination illegal. There was just one problem with Lorie Smith’s lawsuit — The so-called email demanding that she create a web site for the gay couple was sent ONE DAY AFTER HER LAWSUIT WAS FILED. In addition, Lorie Smith and her company had never created ANY web site for ANY individual or company. So why was the company formed in the first place? We all know why. Eventually, Stewart was reached, and he not only said he never sent that email, but that he was a heterosexual who has been happily married to a woman for the last 15 years. By submitting false information to the courts, Lorie Smith committed perjury. And, as a result, Lorie Smith had no standing at all to file this lawsuit.

And, because the justices at the Supreme Court knew of the perjury before they began deliberations, they suborned the perjury. In addition, several justices committed perjury during their Senate confirmations by stating that they would abide by precedent, known as Stare Decisis, and then did the opposite. This week, The Supreme Court of the United States officially became a corrupt criminal enterprise

The Supreme Court of the United States is guilty of subornation of perjury

A right wing extremist, Lorie Smith, was thinking about creating websites. Lorie Smith also wanted her 15 minutes of fame, so she created a company called 303 Creative and then filed a lawsuit claiming that a gay couple known as Stewart and Mike had...

www.dailykos.com

The most corrupt, and illegitimate court in the nations history.

More fake news from kos

 

[JohnDB]

That doesn’t correct the record at all.

Which of the big words did you not want to understand?

Like "pre-emptive lawsuit"
Trolls are considered people too?

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong.
The SCOTUS allowed individuals to illegal discriminate against a whole section of society.
That violates the 14th amendment of the Constitution.
That puts all minorities at risk, including conservatives.

Nope. The 14th Amendment prevents discrimination on the basis of race, creed or national origin. It says nothing about sexual preference.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Standing does not really matter that much once it gets to the SCOTUS, since what they have to decide is whether previous rulings by lower courts were wrong or not, regardless of original standing.

And the basic question is whether or not businesses can be allowed to discriminate at will.
And it seems obvious that would destroy society completely.
Do you really want businesses owned by democrats to not allow republican customers?
That would ensure mass violence.
Within a few decades, the whole society would devolve into civil war.

Only a complete drooling FOOL would claim that discrimination would harm society

It will harm no one and NOTHING and that is FACT

 

[Marener]

Nope. The 14th Amendment prevents discrimination on the basis of race, creed or national origin. It says nothing about sexual preference.

You need to go back and read the 14th amendment.

 

[Lesh]

Which of the big words did you not want to understand?

Like "pre-emptive lawsuit"
Trolls are considered people too?

The complaint is that it IS a “pre-emotive lawsuit” and you proved it so.

The SC does not take such cases… I’m a normal world

 

[BlueGin]

What a wonderful fantasy land you live in.

People who have never worked, and have not paid into SS and Medicare, DO NOT get those benefits after 65.

Kvetch some more.

Sure they do. I have a family member that has never worked since the 80’s and gets full Medicare coverage. They are only 50.

 

[Blaster]

They not only violated their trust, but their basic belief in the general concepts of law, and will be guilty of murder for all the millions of deaths this will eventually cause.
So they will die if this gets to that point in their lifetime.
They will pay for their crime.

Nonsense.

 

[bripat9643]

This will not cause one murder much less multiple

They will be hailed as a greast court as fools like you are laughed into obscurity

Queers are so paranoid the everyone wants to kill them.

 

[Lesh]

Only a complete drooling FOOL would claim that discrimination would harm society

It will harm no one and NOTHING and that is FACT

WHAT?

 

[Lesh]

Sure they do. I have a family member that has never worked since the 80’s and gets full Medicare coverage. They are only 50.

You mean Medicaid? Disability?

Those are different things

 

[Rigby5]

What a wonderful fantasy land you live in.

People who have never worked, and have not paid into SS and Medicare, DO NOT get those benefits after 65.

Kvetch some more.

Not quite.
There are payments to spouses, disabled, poor, etc.

{...
If you have never worked, you won’t have the required credits to get normal Social Security benefits. However, you could still receive benefits through your spouse or qualify for Supplemental Security Income (SSI), a need-based program for low-income and disabled people12.
...}