The true RINOs

[Daryl Hunt]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

I didn't say it wasn't legit. I said it wasn't connected with Harvard University like you made the claim. And since it is only a 2 year college, it can't be called a University which are 4 year Partially Federal Funded Universities. That makes your "School" closer to a Trade School.

Okay, I wonder what the instructors at the various Plumbing Schools have to say? It amounts to the same thing.

I can't help if you have reading comprehension issues. Read the first sentence of the following link:

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

"The Harvard Kennedy School (also known as the John F. Kennedy School of Government and HKS) is the public policy school of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts."

You can keep trying to discredit the school, but no one can dispute the facts that the MSM biased against Trump, as proven by a very legitimate study.

Using Wiki for your only source isn't a good thing. If I wanted to, for a few days,I can edit it to read that Harvard Kennedy School is a Kindergarten School in the Bronx.

And Havad? (pronounced like I spelled it)

What about the wiki do you not believe? Be specific.

The mainstream media is against trump the same way it was against Bill Clinton over Monica lewinski. Sorry they didn’t ask nicer questions. Sorry they never complimented your wonderful smile.

Billy had no business messing with Monica in the WH. He got what he deserved. Sorry, that dog don't hunt. As for Rump, he deserves every negative that's been reported on him because he earned them all.

BTW, nice deflection.

 

[kyzr]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

I didn't say it wasn't legit. I said it wasn't connected with Harvard University like you made the claim. And since it is only a 2 year college, it can't be called a University which are 4 year Partially Federal Funded Universities. That makes your "School" closer to a Trade School.

Okay, I wonder what the instructors at the various Plumbing Schools have to say? It amounts to the same thing.

I can't help if you have reading comprehension issues. Read the first sentence of the following link:

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

"The Harvard Kennedy School (also known as the John F. Kennedy School of Government and HKS) is the public policy school of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts."

You can keep trying to discredit the school, but no one can dispute the facts that the MSM biased against Trump, as proven by a very legitimate study.

Using Wiki for your only source isn't a good thing. If I wanted to, for a few days,I can edit it to read that Harvard Kennedy School is a Kindergarten School in the Bronx.

And Havad? (pronounced like I spelled it)

You can't refute the "science" so whine about minutiae.
The MSM was 95% negative on Trump, while FXN was about 50/50 in fairness, period. QED.

 

[DBA]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

I didn't say it wasn't legit. I said it wasn't connected with Harvard University like you made the claim. And since it is only a 2 year college, it can't be called a University which are 4 year Partially Federal Funded Universities. That makes your "School" closer to a Trade School.

Okay, I wonder what the instructors at the various Plumbing Schools have to say? It amounts to the same thing.

Are you seriously trying to argue that you think Fox News is as biased as CNN or are you trying to saying that Fox News is biased and CNN isn’t? Anybody with 1/2 a brain can turn on CNN and just watch the news ticker and the bottom and see the bias. You can’t do the same with Fox because they actually do say some despraging things about Trump. CNN will bend over backwards not to say one discouraging word about Biden...not one.

 

[DBA]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

I didn't say it wasn't legit. I said it wasn't connected with Harvard University like you made the claim. And since it is only a 2 year college, it can't be called a University which are 4 year Partially Federal Funded Universities. That makes your "School" closer to a Trade School.

Okay, I wonder what the instructors at the various Plumbing Schools have to say? It amounts to the same thing.

I can't help if you have reading comprehension issues. Read the first sentence of the following link:

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

"The Harvard Kennedy School (also known as the John F. Kennedy School of Government and HKS) is the public policy school of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts."

You can keep trying to discredit the school, but no one can dispute the facts that the MSM biased against Trump, as proven by a very legitimate study.

Using Wiki for your only source isn't a good thing. If I wanted to, for a few days,I can edit it to read that Harvard Kennedy School is a Kindergarten School in the Bronx.

And Havad? (pronounced like I spelled it)

What about the wiki do you not believe? Be specific.

The mainstream media is against trump the same way it was against Bill Clinton over Monica lewinski. Sorry they didn’t ask nicer questions. Sorry they never complimented your wonderful smile.

As for Rump, he deserves every negative that's been reported on him because he earned them all.

So he deserved the fake news stories and an full multi-million dollar investigation about how he and his campaign colluded with Russia? He deserved the nonsense and mis-quoting in Charlottesville? He deserved being called a racist simply because he didn’t bow down to the left-wing nuts and their every want and desire? How many times did the NYT have to issue corrections to false NEGATIVE stories regarding Trump? Funny, no corrections to any positive stories because they don’t have any.

 

[CowboyTed]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

And it doesn't show bias...

It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...

If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...

Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...

That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...

 

[CowboyTed]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

I didn't say it wasn't legit. I said it wasn't connected with Harvard University like you made the claim. And since it is only a 2 year college, it can't be called a University which are 4 year Partially Federal Funded Universities. That makes your "School" closer to a Trade School.

Okay, I wonder what the instructors at the various Plumbing Schools have to say? It amounts to the same thing.

Are you seriously trying to argue that you think Fox News is as biased as CNN or are you trying to saying that Fox News is biased and CNN isn’t? Anybody with 1/2 a brain can turn on CNN and just watch the news ticker and the bottom and see the bias. You can’t do the same with Fox because they actually do say some despraging things about Trump. CNN will bend over backwards not to say one discouraging word about Biden...not one.

So if you say something critical about the President your are Bias?

Lets take the latest news story... Trump is on the call pressuring the Georgia sec of state. Those are facts.

Blaming the Press at this stage is a joke... Worldwide Press which has no skin the game have been for years trying to figure out how he is still in charge... The guy is plainly incompetent, COVID response and the tapes would have any other leader resign... Simply other countries expect better than Trump, Trump makes US initially into a laughing stock but now the general mood is pity..

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Analysis: Trump and Hawley set off Republican meltdown with Georgia elections looming

President Donald Trump is stoking division in the Republican ranks days before control of the Senate -- and the balance of power in Washington -- is decided in a pair of runoff elections in Georgia.

www.cnn.com

Both of those goons are the ultimate RINOs and will spend the rest of their sorry days in infamy.

17 and 1/2 days until American liberation.

Good luck president biden

Beijing Biden gonna stumble the first nine out of ten steps he takes!
This is a guarantee!!

I hope he and Nancy pelosi expose Mitch and the republicans for being the ones who dont want to help middle class and poor people. Only rich. Make it very clear and obvious. Make them explain why they vote no.

Best way to help is to allow the free markets to function as they should without govt interference. If you had even a modicum of business acumen you would understand why.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

I didn't say it wasn't legit. I said it wasn't connected with Harvard University like you made the claim. And since it is only a 2 year college, it can't be called a University which are 4 year Partially Federal Funded Universities. That makes your "School" closer to a Trade School.

Okay, I wonder what the instructors at the various Plumbing Schools have to say? It amounts to the same thing.

Are you seriously trying to argue that you think Fox News is as biased as CNN or are you trying to saying that Fox News is biased and CNN isn’t? Anybody with 1/2 a brain can turn on CNN and just watch the news ticker and the bottom and see the bias. You can’t do the same with Fox because they actually do say some despraging things about Trump. CNN will bend over backwards not to say one discouraging word about Biden...not one.

So if you say something critical about the President your are Bias?

Lets take the latest news story... Trump is on the call pressuring the Georgia sec of state. Those are facts.

Blaming the Press at this stage is a joke... Worldwide Press which has no skin the game have been for years trying to figure out how he is still in charge... The guy is plainly incompetent, COVID response and the tapes would have any other leader resign... Simply other countries expect better than Trump, Trump makes US initially into a laughing stock but now the general mood is pity..

“Plainly incompetent”. In your view. 75mil disagreed. That’s not a tiny number. No one is perfect.

 

[kyzr]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...

Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

 

[my2¢]

You're giving Trump and Hawley too much credit referring to the two as RINOs. I consider them AINOs. Their attacks upon our free election system have proven them American In Name Only.

 

[sealybobo]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

I didn't say it wasn't legit. I said it wasn't connected with Harvard University like you made the claim. And since it is only a 2 year college, it can't be called a University which are 4 year Partially Federal Funded Universities. That makes your "School" closer to a Trade School.

Okay, I wonder what the instructors at the various Plumbing Schools have to say? It amounts to the same thing.

I can't help if you have reading comprehension issues. Read the first sentence of the following link:

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

"The Harvard Kennedy School (also known as the John F. Kennedy School of Government and HKS) is the public policy school of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts."

You can keep trying to discredit the school, but no one can dispute the facts that the MSM biased against Trump, as proven by a very legitimate study.

Using Wiki for your only source isn't a good thing. If I wanted to, for a few days,I can edit it to read that Harvard Kennedy School is a Kindergarten School in the Bronx.

And Havad? (pronounced like I spelled it)

What about the wiki do you not believe? Be specific.

The mainstream media is against trump the same way it was against Bill Clinton over Monica lewinski. Sorry they didn’t ask nicer questions. Sorry they never complimented your wonderful smile.

As for Rump, he deserves every negative that's been reported on him because he earned them all.

So he deserved the fake news stories and an full multi-million dollar investigation about how he and his campaign colluded with Russia? He deserved the nonsense and mis-quoting in Charlottesville? He deserved being called a racist simply because he didn’t bow down to the left-wing nuts and their every want and desire? How many times did the NYT have to issue corrections to false NEGATIVE stories regarding Trump? Funny, no corrections to any positive stories because they don’t have any.

Show me the times unissued corrections to what they wrote about trump.

Trump wasn’t misquoted in Charlottesville. He defended the white supremists

 

[CowboyTed]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

I didn't say it wasn't legit. I said it wasn't connected with Harvard University like you made the claim. And since it is only a 2 year college, it can't be called a University which are 4 year Partially Federal Funded Universities. That makes your "School" closer to a Trade School.

Okay, I wonder what the instructors at the various Plumbing Schools have to say? It amounts to the same thing.

Are you seriously trying to argue that you think Fox News is as biased as CNN or are you trying to saying that Fox News is biased and CNN isn’t? Anybody with 1/2 a brain can turn on CNN and just watch the news ticker and the bottom and see the bias. You can’t do the same with Fox because they actually do say some despraging things about Trump. CNN will bend over backwards not to say one discouraging word about Biden...not one.

So if you say something critical about the President your are Bias?

Lets take the latest news story... Trump is on the call pressuring the Georgia sec of state. Those are facts.

Blaming the Press at this stage is a joke... Worldwide Press which has no skin the game have been for years trying to figure out how he is still in charge... The guy is plainly incompetent, COVID response and the tapes would have any other leader resign... Simply other countries expect better than Trump, Trump makes US initially into a laughing stock but now the general mood is pity..

“Plainly incompetent”. In your view. 75mil disagreed. That’s not a tiny number. No one is perfect.

Just look at the facts...

President's job is to defend America.

He failed to do so and the numbers show it... US has 4.2% of the world pop but had 20% of the COVID Deaths.

Trump's team tried to push numerous false stories like COVID deaths aren't deaths from COVID... Then the Excess Deaths figures were worse and they shut up..
He tried to down play the virus that will kill more Americans than WW2 in a year.

His job was to defend America and he could done that a lot better by telling the truth, he didn't, basic task failed. That is the definition of incompetency.


incompetence
(ɪnkɒmpɪtəns )
UNCOUNTABLE NOUN
If you refer to someone's incompetence, you are criticizing them because they are unable to do their job or a task properly.

 

[CowboyTed]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...

Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

Mexico was meant to pay for the wall...

One long wall is ineffective way patrol a border...

Even the Boarder Patrol wanted a 2 fences in built up area with a gap and electronic surveillance in that gap...

Was Mexico not paying for that?

Trump was the one painting a picture of massive caravans coming to the boarder just full of rapists and murders...

Again it is not a promise kept because Mexico didn't pay for it, it was actually taken from a housing budget for Military families... Outside certain area the wall was not needed and was better if drones were used...

 

[kyzr]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...

Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

Mexico was meant to pay for the wall...

One long wall is ineffective way patrol a border...

Even the Boarder Patrol wanted a 2 fences in built up area with a gap and electronic surveillance in that gap...

Was Mexico not paying for that?

Trump was the one painting a picture of massive caravans coming to the boarder just full of rapists and murders...

Again it is not a promise kept because Mexico didn't pay for it, it was actually taken from a housing budget for Military families... Outside certain area the wall was not needed and was better if drones were used...

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if congress implemented a "remittance tax" on money sent out of the US.

The Taxing of Remittances in the US - CrossTech

imtconferences.com

2. The border patrol overwhelmingly supports the wall:

Border Patrol agents back Trump wall, survey finds

In a new survey conducted by the National Border Patrol Council, the agents’ union, they overwhelmingly backed adding a “wall system” in new strategic locations, saying it will boost their ability to nab or deter would-be illegal immigrants.

www.washingtontimes.com

3. A good border stops illegals, terrorists, drugs, and reduces crime throughout the US. There is no reason to have "open borders", unless you're a TDS democrat.

4. MS-13 is full of rapists and murderers

5. Drones are useless, they are not everywhere all the time like the wall. Drones don't apprehend intruders.
The wall has cameras and sensors to detect tunneling. Drones don't do that.

 

[CowboyTed]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...

Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

Mexico was meant to pay for the wall...

One long wall is ineffective way patrol a border...

Even the Boarder Patrol wanted a 2 fences in built up area with a gap and electronic surveillance in that gap...

Was Mexico not paying for that?

Trump was the one painting a picture of massive caravans coming to the boarder just full of rapists and murders...

Again it is not a promise kept because Mexico didn't pay for it, it was actually taken from a housing budget for Military families... Outside certain area the wall was not needed and was better if drones were used...

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if congress implemented a "remittance tax" on money sent out of the US.

The Taxing of Remittances in the US - CrossTech

imtconferences.com

2. The border patrol overwhelmingly supports the wall:

Border Patrol agents back Trump wall, survey finds

In a new survey conducted by the National Border Patrol Council, the agents’ union, they overwhelmingly backed adding a “wall system” in new strategic locations, saying it will boost their ability to nab or deter would-be illegal immigrants.

www.washingtontimes.com

3. A good border stops illegals, terrorists, drugs, and reduces crime throughout the US. There is no reason to have "open borders", unless you're a TDS democrat.

4. MS-13 is full of rapists and murderers

5. Drones are useless, they are not everywhere all the time like the wall. Drones don't apprehend intruders.
The wall has cameras and sensors to detect tunneling. Drones don't do that.

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if US invaded them as well... It didn't happen and was never going to happen, GOP held Congress and it didn't happen. Why? Cause it is a fucking stupid idea that on makes sense to people with simple minds (Why Remittance Taxes to Finance a Border Wall are a Bad Idea … for the US)

2.From your article.
"The NBPC’s survey, of more than 600 agents in two of the Border Patrol’s busiest sectors, found just the opposite: A stunning 89 percent of line agents say a “wall system in strategic locations is necessary to securing the border.” Just 7 percent disagreed."
The Democrats never said no wall everywhere, it was Trump that wanted a continuous wall (not a fence)... Boarder Patrol was the ones that got it back to a fence..

3. The open border was a Reagan idea, Democrats wanted a smart border which let in people who wanted to work and have the option to go home for off season. It is the GOP polices that keep them in US, that is why Reagan wanted open borders... Democrats want a regulated border... Trump wants a Wall...

4. MS-13 is a Gang that was setup in America.

5. For starters there is little to no Wall, you were promised a Wall and you got a fence, the fence can be cut through OR climbed...
Walls/Fences don't apprehend intruders.
As for Tunnelling, Are you that dumb... Tunnelling detectors work at best 25ft.. Look at the Gaza Strip Egypt boarder, it is a few miles long and there is 100s of tunnells

Gaza Strip smuggling tunnels - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Israel equipment is the best in the world and it max at 32 feet... Mexico gangs have access to way more and better resources than Gaza Strip...
Can't believe you are so ignorant about tunnelling..

You have only shown how ignorant you are about broader security and Democrats position on it... Democrats have not only agreed for boarder fencing but have actually built it and paid for it with out Military families suffering... Trump's boarder wall was so bad that GOP couldn't even pay for it..

 

[kyzr]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...

Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

Mexico was meant to pay for the wall...

One long wall is ineffective way patrol a border...

Even the Boarder Patrol wanted a 2 fences in built up area with a gap and electronic surveillance in that gap...

Was Mexico not paying for that?

Trump was the one painting a picture of massive caravans coming to the boarder just full of rapists and murders...

Again it is not a promise kept because Mexico didn't pay for it, it was actually taken from a housing budget for Military families... Outside certain area the wall was not needed and was better if drones were used...

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if congress implemented a "remittance tax" on money sent out of the US.

The Taxing of Remittances in the US - CrossTech

imtconferences.com

2. The border patrol overwhelmingly supports the wall:

Border Patrol agents back Trump wall, survey finds

In a new survey conducted by the National Border Patrol Council, the agents’ union, they overwhelmingly backed adding a “wall system” in new strategic locations, saying it will boost their ability to nab or deter would-be illegal immigrants.

www.washingtontimes.com

3. A good border stops illegals, terrorists, drugs, and reduces crime throughout the US. There is no reason to have "open borders", unless you're a TDS democrat.

4. MS-13 is full of rapists and murderers

5. Drones are useless, they are not everywhere all the time like the wall. Drones don't apprehend intruders.
The wall has cameras and sensors to detect tunneling. Drones don't do that.

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if US invaded them as well... It didn't happen and was never going to happen, GOP held Congress and it didn't happen. Why? Cause it is a fucking stupid idea that on makes sense to people with simple minds (Why Remittance Taxes to Finance a Border Wall are a Bad Idea … for the US)

2.From your article.
"The NBPC’s survey, of more than 600 agents in two of the Border Patrol’s busiest sectors, found just the opposite: A stunning 89 percent of line agents say a “wall system in strategic locations is necessary to securing the border.” Just 7 percent disagreed."
The Democrats never said no wall everywhere, it was Trump that wanted a continuous wall (not a fence)... Boarder Patrol was the ones that got it back to a fence..

3. The open border was a Reagan idea, Democrats wanted a smart border which let in people who wanted to work and have the option to go home for off season. It is the GOP polices that keep them in US, that is why Reagan wanted open borders... Democrats want a regulated border... Trump wants a Wall...

4. MS-13 is a Gang that was setup in America.

5. For starters there is little to no Wall, you were promised a Wall and you got a fence, the fence can be cut through OR climbed...
Walls/Fences don't apprehend intruders.
As for Tunnelling, Are you that dumb... Tunnelling detectors work at best 25ft.. Look at the Gaza Strip Egypt boarder, it is a few miles long and there is 100s of tunnells

Gaza Strip smuggling tunnels - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Israel equipment is the best in the world and it max at 32 feet... Mexico gangs have access to way more and better resources than Gaza Strip...
Can't believe you are so ignorant about tunnelling..

You have only shown how ignorant you are about broader security and Democrats position on it... Democrats have not only agreed for boarder fencing but have actually built it and paid for it with out Military families suffering... Trump's boarder wall was so bad that GOP couldn't even pay for it..

1. The wall is built, it works. The Border Patrol loves it, end of discussion.
2. 420 miles of wall built, 516 miles is the goal. Well done.

Trump Wall Construction - Track the Status of Trump's Border Wall!

Track the Status of Trump's Border Wall!

www.trumpwall.construction

3. Nonsense. Democrats want open borders.

2020 Dems Overwhelmingly Back Decriminalizing Border Crossings In 2nd Debate

A growing number of party leaders want to overturn the decades-old law that Trump used to split up families at the border.

www.huffpost.com

4. Who gives a fuck where MS-13 originated. Its an international criminal gang now.

MS-13 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

5. Dumb? At least I know how to spell "tunnel" and "border".
Look at the old ineffective "wall", and the new improved wall. There is no comparison. It works well, that's all that matters.

The tunneling sensors are continuous, so your argument about sensors falls flat.

New border wall forces smugglers to dig expensive tunnels and launch drones - Washington Examiner

SAN DIEGO — Top U.S. border officials expect cartels to build more tunnels from Mexico to the United States and increasingly rely on drones for surveillance operations as the 400 miles of new border wall makes it harder to smuggle people and drugs into the country.Transnational criminal...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[CowboyTed]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...

Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

Mexico was meant to pay for the wall...

One long wall is ineffective way patrol a border...

Even the Boarder Patrol wanted a 2 fences in built up area with a gap and electronic surveillance in that gap...

Was Mexico not paying for that?

Trump was the one painting a picture of massive caravans coming to the boarder just full of rapists and murders...

Again it is not a promise kept because Mexico didn't pay for it, it was actually taken from a housing budget for Military families... Outside certain area the wall was not needed and was better if drones were used...

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if congress implemented a "remittance tax" on money sent out of the US.

The Taxing of Remittances in the US - CrossTech

imtconferences.com

2. The border patrol overwhelmingly supports the wall:

Border Patrol agents back Trump wall, survey finds

In a new survey conducted by the National Border Patrol Council, the agents’ union, they overwhelmingly backed adding a “wall system” in new strategic locations, saying it will boost their ability to nab or deter would-be illegal immigrants.

www.washingtontimes.com

3. A good border stops illegals, terrorists, drugs, and reduces crime throughout the US. There is no reason to have "open borders", unless you're a TDS democrat.

4. MS-13 is full of rapists and murderers

5. Drones are useless, they are not everywhere all the time like the wall. Drones don't apprehend intruders.
The wall has cameras and sensors to detect tunneling. Drones don't do that.

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if US invaded them as well... It didn't happen and was never going to happen, GOP held Congress and it didn't happen. Why? Cause it is a fucking stupid idea that on makes sense to people with simple minds (Why Remittance Taxes to Finance a Border Wall are a Bad Idea … for the US)

2.From your article.
"The NBPC’s survey, of more than 600 agents in two of the Border Patrol’s busiest sectors, found just the opposite: A stunning 89 percent of line agents say a “wall system in strategic locations is necessary to securing the border.” Just 7 percent disagreed."
The Democrats never said no wall everywhere, it was Trump that wanted a continuous wall (not a fence)... Boarder Patrol was the ones that got it back to a fence..

3. The open border was a Reagan idea, Democrats wanted a smart border which let in people who wanted to work and have the option to go home for off season. It is the GOP polices that keep them in US, that is why Reagan wanted open borders... Democrats want a regulated border... Trump wants a Wall...

4. MS-13 is a Gang that was setup in America.

5. For starters there is little to no Wall, you were promised a Wall and you got a fence, the fence can be cut through OR climbed...
Walls/Fences don't apprehend intruders.
As for Tunnelling, Are you that dumb... Tunnelling detectors work at best 25ft.. Look at the Gaza Strip Egypt boarder, it is a few miles long and there is 100s of tunnells

Gaza Strip smuggling tunnels - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Israel equipment is the best in the world and it max at 32 feet... Mexico gangs have access to way more and better resources than Gaza Strip...
Can't believe you are so ignorant about tunnelling..

You have only shown how ignorant you are about broader security and Democrats position on it... Democrats have not only agreed for boarder fencing but have actually built it and paid for it with out Military families suffering... Trump's boarder wall was so bad that GOP couldn't even pay for it..

1. The wall is built, it works. The Border Patrol loves it, end of discussion.
2. 420 miles of wall built, 516 miles is the goal. Well done.

Trump Wall Construction - Track the Status of Trump's Border Wall!

Track the Status of Trump's Border Wall!

www.trumpwall.construction

3. Nonsense. Democrats want open borders.

2020 Dems Overwhelmingly Back Decriminalizing Border Crossings In 2nd Debate

A growing number of party leaders want to overturn the decades-old law that Trump used to split up families at the border.

www.huffpost.com

4. Who gives a fuck where MS-13 originated. Its an international criminal gang now.

MS-13 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

5. Dumb? At least I know how to spell "tunnel" and "border".
Look at the old ineffective "wall", and the new improved wall. There is no comparison. It works well, that's all that matters.
View attachment 437282


The tunneling sensors are continuous, so your argument about sensors falls flat.

New border wall forces smugglers to dig expensive tunnels and launch drones - Washington Examiner

SAN DIEGO — Top U.S. border officials expect cartels to build more tunnels from Mexico to the United States and increasingly rely on drones for surveillance operations as the 400 miles of new border wall makes it harder to smuggle people and drugs into the country.Transnational criminal...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

For starters it is a fence not a wall... which US paid for not Mexico.

But what Mr Trump has actually built is far from what he promised at the start of his 2016 election campaign, when he pledged to build a concrete wall along the border's entire 2,000-mile length.
He later clarified that it would cover only half of that. And by the time of his State of the Union address in February this year, his pledge had been reduced to "substantially more than 500 miles" by January 2021.

Trump wall: How much has he actually built?

What happened to President Trump's long-promised wall? How much of it got built? And how effective has it been?

www.bbc.com

He kept moving the goal posts.... Boarder Patrol like some of it... Democrats paid forr that before Trump arrived...

Trump failed to hire Boarder Patrol he was given money to hire:

Trump ordered the Border Patrol to hire more agents, but instead, it’s losing them

WASHINGTON-- Five days after his inauguration, President Donald Trump ordered the Department of Homeland Security to add 5,000 Border Patrol agents...

www.dallasnews.com

The tunnelling sensors are generally useless as I have shown... But the keep you happy...

 

[kyzr]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...

Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

Mexico was meant to pay for the wall...

One long wall is ineffective way patrol a border...

Even the Boarder Patrol wanted a 2 fences in built up area with a gap and electronic surveillance in that gap...

Was Mexico not paying for that?

Trump was the one painting a picture of massive caravans coming to the boarder just full of rapists and murders...

Again it is not a promise kept because Mexico didn't pay for it, it was actually taken from a housing budget for Military families... Outside certain area the wall was not needed and was better if drones were used...

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if congress implemented a "remittance tax" on money sent out of the US.

The Taxing of Remittances in the US - CrossTech

imtconferences.com

2. The border patrol overwhelmingly supports the wall:

Border Patrol agents back Trump wall, survey finds

In a new survey conducted by the National Border Patrol Council, the agents’ union, they overwhelmingly backed adding a “wall system” in new strategic locations, saying it will boost their ability to nab or deter would-be illegal immigrants.

www.washingtontimes.com

3. A good border stops illegals, terrorists, drugs, and reduces crime throughout the US. There is no reason to have "open borders", unless you're a TDS democrat.

4. MS-13 is full of rapists and murderers

5. Drones are useless, they are not everywhere all the time like the wall. Drones don't apprehend intruders.
The wall has cameras and sensors to detect tunneling. Drones don't do that.

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if US invaded them as well... It didn't happen and was never going to happen, GOP held Congress and it didn't happen. Why? Cause it is a fucking stupid idea that on makes sense to people with simple minds (Why Remittance Taxes to Finance a Border Wall are a Bad Idea … for the US)

2.From your article.
"The NBPC’s survey, of more than 600 agents in two of the Border Patrol’s busiest sectors, found just the opposite: A stunning 89 percent of line agents say a “wall system in strategic locations is necessary to securing the border.” Just 7 percent disagreed."
The Democrats never said no wall everywhere, it was Trump that wanted a continuous wall (not a fence)... Boarder Patrol was the ones that got it back to a fence..

3. The open border was a Reagan idea, Democrats wanted a smart border which let in people who wanted to work and have the option to go home for off season. It is the GOP polices that keep them in US, that is why Reagan wanted open borders... Democrats want a regulated border... Trump wants a Wall...

4. MS-13 is a Gang that was setup in America.

5. For starters there is little to no Wall, you were promised a Wall and you got a fence, the fence can be cut through OR climbed...
Walls/Fences don't apprehend intruders.
As for Tunnelling, Are you that dumb... Tunnelling detectors work at best 25ft.. Look at the Gaza Strip Egypt boarder, it is a few miles long and there is 100s of tunnells

Gaza Strip smuggling tunnels - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Israel equipment is the best in the world and it max at 32 feet... Mexico gangs have access to way more and better resources than Gaza Strip...
Can't believe you are so ignorant about tunnelling..

You have only shown how ignorant you are about broader security and Democrats position on it... Democrats have not only agreed for boarder fencing but have actually built it and paid for it with out Military families suffering... Trump's boarder wall was so bad that GOP couldn't even pay for it..

1. The wall is built, it works. The Border Patrol loves it, end of discussion.
2. 420 miles of wall built, 516 miles is the goal. Well done.

Trump Wall Construction - Track the Status of Trump's Border Wall!

Track the Status of Trump's Border Wall!

www.trumpwall.construction

3. Nonsense. Democrats want open borders.

2020 Dems Overwhelmingly Back Decriminalizing Border Crossings In 2nd Debate

A growing number of party leaders want to overturn the decades-old law that Trump used to split up families at the border.

www.huffpost.com

4. Who gives a fuck where MS-13 originated. Its an international criminal gang now.

MS-13 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

5. Dumb? At least I know how to spell "tunnel" and "border".
Look at the old ineffective "wall", and the new improved wall. There is no comparison. It works well, that's all that matters.
View attachment 437282


The tunneling sensors are continuous, so your argument about sensors falls flat.

New border wall forces smugglers to dig expensive tunnels and launch drones - Washington Examiner

SAN DIEGO — Top U.S. border officials expect cartels to build more tunnels from Mexico to the United States and increasingly rely on drones for surveillance operations as the 400 miles of new border wall makes it harder to smuggle people and drugs into the country.Transnational criminal...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

For starters it is a fence not a wall... which US paid for not Mexico.

But what Mr Trump has actually built is far from what he promised at the start of his 2016 election campaign, when he pledged to build a concrete wall along the border's entire 2,000-mile length.
He later clarified that it would cover only half of that. And by the time of his State of the Union address in February this year, his pledge had been reduced to "substantially more than 500 miles" by January 2021.

Trump wall: How much has he actually built?

What happened to President Trump's long-promised wall? How much of it got built? And how effective has it been?

www.bbc.com

He kept moving the goal posts.... Boarder Patrol like some of it... Democrats paid for that before Trump arrived...

Trump failed to hire Boarder Patrol he was given money to hire:

Trump ordered the Border Patrol to hire more agents, but instead, it’s losing them

WASHINGTON-- Five days after his inauguration, President Donald Trump ordered the Department of Homeland Security to add 5,000 Border Patrol agents...

www.dallasnews.com

The tunnelling sensors are generally useless as I have shown... But the keep you happy...

1. The wall is built and works. Its paid for.
2. Don't you know how to read? Its a "wall", as promised.
3. Democrats didn't do anything, Trump totally re-designed the wall, so Border Patrol could see thru it.
4. The Border Patrol can do more with less with the big beautiful wall.

Trump's wall and deal with Mexico are keeping illegals crossing to a minimum.

 

[CowboyTed]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...

Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

Mexico was meant to pay for the wall...

One long wall is ineffective way patrol a border...

Even the Boarder Patrol wanted a 2 fences in built up area with a gap and electronic surveillance in that gap...

Was Mexico not paying for that?

Trump was the one painting a picture of massive caravans coming to the boarder just full of rapists and murders...

Again it is not a promise kept because Mexico didn't pay for it, it was actually taken from a housing budget for Military families... Outside certain area the wall was not needed and was better if drones were used...

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if congress implemented a "remittance tax" on money sent out of the US.

The Taxing of Remittances in the US - CrossTech

imtconferences.com

2. The border patrol overwhelmingly supports the wall:

Border Patrol agents back Trump wall, survey finds

In a new survey conducted by the National Border Patrol Council, the agents’ union, they overwhelmingly backed adding a “wall system” in new strategic locations, saying it will boost their ability to nab or deter would-be illegal immigrants.

www.washingtontimes.com

3. A good border stops illegals, terrorists, drugs, and reduces crime throughout the US. There is no reason to have "open borders", unless you're a TDS democrat.

4. MS-13 is full of rapists and murderers

5. Drones are useless, they are not everywhere all the time like the wall. Drones don't apprehend intruders.
The wall has cameras and sensors to detect tunneling. Drones don't do that.

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if US invaded them as well... It didn't happen and was never going to happen, GOP held Congress and it didn't happen. Why? Cause it is a fucking stupid idea that on makes sense to people with simple minds (Why Remittance Taxes to Finance a Border Wall are a Bad Idea … for the US)

2.From your article.
"The NBPC’s survey, of more than 600 agents in two of the Border Patrol’s busiest sectors, found just the opposite: A stunning 89 percent of line agents say a “wall system in strategic locations is necessary to securing the border.” Just 7 percent disagreed."
The Democrats never said no wall everywhere, it was Trump that wanted a continuous wall (not a fence)... Boarder Patrol was the ones that got it back to a fence..

3. The open border was a Reagan idea, Democrats wanted a smart border which let in people who wanted to work and have the option to go home for off season. It is the GOP polices that keep them in US, that is why Reagan wanted open borders... Democrats want a regulated border... Trump wants a Wall...

4. MS-13 is a Gang that was setup in America.

5. For starters there is little to no Wall, you were promised a Wall and you got a fence, the fence can be cut through OR climbed...
Walls/Fences don't apprehend intruders.
As for Tunnelling, Are you that dumb... Tunnelling detectors work at best 25ft.. Look at the Gaza Strip Egypt boarder, it is a few miles long and there is 100s of tunnells

Gaza Strip smuggling tunnels - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Israel equipment is the best in the world and it max at 32 feet... Mexico gangs have access to way more and better resources than Gaza Strip...
Can't believe you are so ignorant about tunnelling..

You have only shown how ignorant you are about broader security and Democrats position on it... Democrats have not only agreed for boarder fencing but have actually built it and paid for it with out Military families suffering... Trump's boarder wall was so bad that GOP couldn't even pay for it..

1. The wall is built, it works. The Border Patrol loves it, end of discussion.
2. 420 miles of wall built, 516 miles is the goal. Well done.

Trump Wall Construction - Track the Status of Trump's Border Wall!

Track the Status of Trump's Border Wall!

www.trumpwall.construction

3. Nonsense. Democrats want open borders.

2020 Dems Overwhelmingly Back Decriminalizing Border Crossings In 2nd Debate

A growing number of party leaders want to overturn the decades-old law that Trump used to split up families at the border.

www.huffpost.com

4. Who gives a fuck where MS-13 originated. Its an international criminal gang now.

MS-13 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

5. Dumb? At least I know how to spell "tunnel" and "border".
Look at the old ineffective "wall", and the new improved wall. There is no comparison. It works well, that's all that matters.
View attachment 437282


The tunneling sensors are continuous, so your argument about sensors falls flat.

New border wall forces smugglers to dig expensive tunnels and launch drones - Washington Examiner

SAN DIEGO — Top U.S. border officials expect cartels to build more tunnels from Mexico to the United States and increasingly rely on drones for surveillance operations as the 400 miles of new border wall makes it harder to smuggle people and drugs into the country.Transnational criminal...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

For starters it is a fence not a wall... which US paid for not Mexico.

But what Mr Trump has actually built is far from what he promised at the start of his 2016 election campaign, when he pledged to build a concrete wall along the border's entire 2,000-mile length.
He later clarified that it would cover only half of that. And by the time of his State of the Union address in February this year, his pledge had been reduced to "substantially more than 500 miles" by January 2021.

Trump wall: How much has he actually built?

What happened to President Trump's long-promised wall? How much of it got built? And how effective has it been?

www.bbc.com

He kept moving the goal posts.... Boarder Patrol like some of it... Democrats paid for that before Trump arrived...

Trump failed to hire Boarder Patrol he was given money to hire:

Trump ordered the Border Patrol to hire more agents, but instead, it’s losing them

WASHINGTON-- Five days after his inauguration, President Donald Trump ordered the Department of Homeland Security to add 5,000 Border Patrol agents...

www.dallasnews.com

The tunnelling sensors are generally useless as I have shown... But the keep you happy...

1. The wall is built and works. Its paid for.
2. Don't you know how to read? Its a "wall", as promised.
3. Democrats didn't do anything, Trump totally re-designed the wall, so Border Patrol could see thru it.
4. The Border Patrol can do more with less with the big beautiful wall.

Trump's wall and deal with Mexico are keeping illegals crossing to a minimum.

Again it is a fence... here is a picture of them cutting through the multi billion dollar fence with tools from hardware store

But then they got smart and used razorwire...

America pays for the wall: thieves mock Trump by stealing border razor wire

Fifteen people reportedly arrested for robbing concertina wire installed by US authorities and selling it to locals in Tijuana

www.theguardian.com

It is just getting funny now...

Now it looks like they paid Mexico to build the wall

Armed Mexicans Were Smuggled In to Guard Border Wall, Whistle-Blowers Say (Published 2020)

In a complaint unsealed on Friday, whistle-blowers working on President Trump’s wall said that contractors were illegally bringing in Mexican guards to protect construction sites.

www.nytimes.com

But it is not all bad, Bannon might go to jail for the wall...

 

[Daryl Hunt]

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.

Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Harvard Study Confirms Media Bias Against Trump

The credibility of the mainstream media takes another hit, this time from a surprising source. By Bob Adelmann

thenewamerican.com

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.

OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

Harvard Kennedy School - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.

Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".

And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...

Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

Mexico was meant to pay for the wall...

One long wall is ineffective way patrol a border...

Even the Boarder Patrol wanted a 2 fences in built up area with a gap and electronic surveillance in that gap...

Was Mexico not paying for that?

Trump was the one painting a picture of massive caravans coming to the boarder just full of rapists and murders...

Again it is not a promise kept because Mexico didn't pay for it, it was actually taken from a housing budget for Military families... Outside certain area the wall was not needed and was better if drones were used...

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if congress implemented a "remittance tax" on money sent out of the US.

The Taxing of Remittances in the US - CrossTech

imtconferences.com

2. The border patrol overwhelmingly supports the wall:

Border Patrol agents back Trump wall, survey finds

In a new survey conducted by the National Border Patrol Council, the agents’ union, they overwhelmingly backed adding a “wall system” in new strategic locations, saying it will boost their ability to nab or deter would-be illegal immigrants.

www.washingtontimes.com

3. A good border stops illegals, terrorists, drugs, and reduces crime throughout the US. There is no reason to have "open borders", unless you're a TDS democrat.

4. MS-13 is full of rapists and murderers

5. Drones are useless, they are not everywhere all the time like the wall. Drones don't apprehend intruders.
The wall has cameras and sensors to detect tunneling. Drones don't do that.

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if US invaded them as well... It didn't happen and was never going to happen, GOP held Congress and it didn't happen. Why? Cause it is a fucking stupid idea that on makes sense to people with simple minds (Why Remittance Taxes to Finance a Border Wall are a Bad Idea … for the US)

2.From your article.
"The NBPC’s survey, of more than 600 agents in two of the Border Patrol’s busiest sectors, found just the opposite: A stunning 89 percent of line agents say a “wall system in strategic locations is necessary to securing the border.” Just 7 percent disagreed."
The Democrats never said no wall everywhere, it was Trump that wanted a continuous wall (not a fence)... Boarder Patrol was the ones that got it back to a fence..

3. The open border was a Reagan idea, Democrats wanted a smart border which let in people who wanted to work and have the option to go home for off season. It is the GOP polices that keep them in US, that is why Reagan wanted open borders... Democrats want a regulated border... Trump wants a Wall...

4. MS-13 is a Gang that was setup in America.

5. For starters there is little to no Wall, you were promised a Wall and you got a fence, the fence can be cut through OR climbed...
Walls/Fences don't apprehend intruders.
As for Tunnelling, Are you that dumb... Tunnelling detectors work at best 25ft.. Look at the Gaza Strip Egypt boarder, it is a few miles long and there is 100s of tunnells

Gaza Strip smuggling tunnels - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Israel equipment is the best in the world and it max at 32 feet... Mexico gangs have access to way more and better resources than Gaza Strip...
Can't believe you are so ignorant about tunnelling..

You have only shown how ignorant you are about broader security and Democrats position on it... Democrats have not only agreed for boarder fencing but have actually built it and paid for it with out Military families suffering... Trump's boarder wall was so bad that GOP couldn't even pay for it..

1. The wall is built, it works. The Border Patrol loves it, end of discussion.
2. 420 miles of wall built, 516 miles is the goal. Well done.

Trump Wall Construction - Track the Status of Trump's Border Wall!

Track the Status of Trump's Border Wall!

www.trumpwall.construction

3. Nonsense. Democrats want open borders.

2020 Dems Overwhelmingly Back Decriminalizing Border Crossings In 2nd Debate

A growing number of party leaders want to overturn the decades-old law that Trump used to split up families at the border.

www.huffpost.com

4. Who gives a fuck where MS-13 originated. Its an international criminal gang now.

MS-13 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

5. Dumb? At least I know how to spell "tunnel" and "border".
Look at the old ineffective "wall", and the new improved wall. There is no comparison. It works well, that's all that matters.
View attachment 437282


The tunneling sensors are continuous, so your argument about sensors falls flat.

New border wall forces smugglers to dig expensive tunnels and launch drones - Washington Examiner

SAN DIEGO — Top U.S. border officials expect cartels to build more tunnels from Mexico to the United States and increasingly rely on drones for surveillance operations as the 400 miles of new border wall makes it harder to smuggle people and drugs into the country.Transnational criminal...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

It's a fence, a friggin' fence. Rumps idea of a wall fell by the way for a lot of reasons, mainly, the US and Mexico,combined, could not afford to build his "Wall". But the funds were already figured in to build that Fence a 1.3 budge for 2006 and changed in 2017 to 1.4 billion adjusted for inflation. You can stop repeating Rumps lies anytime now. You've been conned by a conman.