The true RINOs

OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.
Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.
OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.
Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".
And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...
Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

Mexico was meant to pay for the wall...

One long wall is ineffective way patrol a border...

Even the Boarder Patrol wanted a 2 fences in built up area with a gap and electronic surveillance in that gap...

Was Mexico not paying for that?

Trump was the one painting a picture of massive caravans coming to the boarder just full of rapists and murders...

Again it is not a promise kept because Mexico didn't pay for it, it was actually taken from a housing budget for Military families... Outside certain area the wall was not needed and was better if drones were used...
1. Mexico could pay for the wall if congress implemented a "remittance tax" on money sent out of the US.

2. The border patrol overwhelmingly supports the wall:

3. A good border stops illegals, terrorists, drugs, and reduces crime throughout the US. There is no reason to have "open borders", unless you're a TDS democrat.

4. MS-13 is full of rapists and murderers

5. Drones are useless, they are not everywhere all the time like the wall. Drones don't apprehend intruders.
The wall has cameras and sensors to detect tunneling. Drones don't do that.

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if US invaded them as well... It didn't happen and was never going to happen, GOP held Congress and it didn't happen. Why? Cause it is a fucking stupid idea that on makes sense to people with simple minds (Why Remittance Taxes to Finance a Border Wall are a Bad Idea … for the US)

2.From your article.
"The NBPC’s survey, of more than 600 agents in two of the Border Patrol’s busiest sectors, found just the opposite: A stunning 89 percent of line agents say a “wall system in strategic locations is necessary to securing the border.” Just 7 percent disagreed."
The Democrats never said no wall everywhere, it was Trump that wanted a continuous wall (not a fence)... Boarder Patrol was the ones that got it back to a fence..

3. The open border was a Reagan idea, Democrats wanted a smart border which let in people who wanted to work and have the option to go home for off season. It is the GOP polices that keep them in US, that is why Reagan wanted open borders... Democrats want a regulated border... Trump wants a Wall...

4. MS-13 is a Gang that was setup in America.

5. For starters there is little to no Wall, you were promised a Wall and you got a fence, the fence can be cut through OR climbed...
Walls/Fences don't apprehend intruders.
As for Tunnelling, Are you that dumb... Tunnelling detectors work at best 25ft.. Look at the Gaza Strip Egypt boarder, it is a few miles long and there is 100s of tunnells
Israel equipment is the best in the world and it max at 32 feet... Mexico gangs have access to way more and better resources than Gaza Strip...
Can't believe you are so ignorant about tunnelling..

You have only shown how ignorant you are about broader security and Democrats position on it... Democrats have not only agreed for boarder fencing but have actually built it and paid for it with out Military families suffering... Trump's boarder wall was so bad that GOP couldn't even pay for it..
1. The wall is built, it works. The Border Patrol loves it, end of discussion.
2. 420 miles of wall built, 516 miles is the goal. Well done.
3. Nonsense. Democrats want open borders.
4. Who gives a fuck where MS-13 originated. Its an international criminal gang now.
5. Dumb? At least I know how to spell "tunnel" and "border".
Look at the old ineffective "wall", and the new improved wall. There is no comparison. It works well, that's all that matters.
View attachment 437282


The tunneling sensors are continuous, so your argument about sensors falls flat.

It's a fence, a friggin' fence. Rumps idea of a wall fell by the way for a lot of reasons, mainly, the US and Mexico,combined, could not afford to build his "Wall". But the funds were already figured in to build that Fence a 1.3 budge for 2006 and changed in 2017 to 1.4 billion adjusted for inflation. You can stop repeating Rumps lies anytime now. You've been conned by a conman.

Your TDS "opinion" means nothing.
The people who guard the border love the new wall because it is effective. Read some facts not bullshit:
Wall, agents and technology have since proven most effective when used in the right combination to improve border security. Today, the area along the border near San Diego has a second layer of woven wire fence about 100 to 200 yards from that first fence to provide an enforcement zone for agents patrolling the border. With lighting, a state-of-the-art surveillance system, and a paved road that gives access to Border Patrol vehicles, agents respond more quickly and the flow of illegal aliens decreased even more. The same sector that annually caught more than 500,000 illegal aliens now apprehends about 27,000 illegal aliens each year. Similar efforts along the Arizona-Mexico border in the last 18 years saw corresponding success rates of cutting illegal crossings by 90-plus percent.

420 miles of new wall is not a "con", it's a fact, and its working. Trump got it done, your welcome.
 
OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.
Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.
OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.
Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".
And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...
Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

Mexico was meant to pay for the wall...

One long wall is ineffective way patrol a border...

Even the Boarder Patrol wanted a 2 fences in built up area with a gap and electronic surveillance in that gap...

Was Mexico not paying for that?

Trump was the one painting a picture of massive caravans coming to the boarder just full of rapists and murders...

Again it is not a promise kept because Mexico didn't pay for it, it was actually taken from a housing budget for Military families... Outside certain area the wall was not needed and was better if drones were used...
1. Mexico could pay for the wall if congress implemented a "remittance tax" on money sent out of the US.

2. The border patrol overwhelmingly supports the wall:

3. A good border stops illegals, terrorists, drugs, and reduces crime throughout the US. There is no reason to have "open borders", unless you're a TDS democrat.

4. MS-13 is full of rapists and murderers

5. Drones are useless, they are not everywhere all the time like the wall. Drones don't apprehend intruders.
The wall has cameras and sensors to detect tunneling. Drones don't do that.

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if US invaded them as well... It didn't happen and was never going to happen, GOP held Congress and it didn't happen. Why? Cause it is a fucking stupid idea that on makes sense to people with simple minds (Why Remittance Taxes to Finance a Border Wall are a Bad Idea … for the US)

2.From your article.
"The NBPC’s survey, of more than 600 agents in two of the Border Patrol’s busiest sectors, found just the opposite: A stunning 89 percent of line agents say a “wall system in strategic locations is necessary to securing the border.” Just 7 percent disagreed."
The Democrats never said no wall everywhere, it was Trump that wanted a continuous wall (not a fence)... Boarder Patrol was the ones that got it back to a fence..

3. The open border was a Reagan idea, Democrats wanted a smart border which let in people who wanted to work and have the option to go home for off season. It is the GOP polices that keep them in US, that is why Reagan wanted open borders... Democrats want a regulated border... Trump wants a Wall...

4. MS-13 is a Gang that was setup in America.

5. For starters there is little to no Wall, you were promised a Wall and you got a fence, the fence can be cut through OR climbed...
Walls/Fences don't apprehend intruders.
As for Tunnelling, Are you that dumb... Tunnelling detectors work at best 25ft.. Look at the Gaza Strip Egypt boarder, it is a few miles long and there is 100s of tunnells
Israel equipment is the best in the world and it max at 32 feet... Mexico gangs have access to way more and better resources than Gaza Strip...
Can't believe you are so ignorant about tunnelling..

You have only shown how ignorant you are about broader security and Democrats position on it... Democrats have not only agreed for boarder fencing but have actually built it and paid for it with out Military families suffering... Trump's boarder wall was so bad that GOP couldn't even pay for it..
1. The wall is built, it works. The Border Patrol loves it, end of discussion.
2. 420 miles of wall built, 516 miles is the goal. Well done.
3. Nonsense. Democrats want open borders.
4. Who gives a fuck where MS-13 originated. Its an international criminal gang now.
5. Dumb? At least I know how to spell "tunnel" and "border".
Look at the old ineffective "wall", and the new improved wall. There is no comparison. It works well, that's all that matters.
View attachment 437282


The tunneling sensors are continuous, so your argument about sensors falls flat.

For starters it is a fence not a wall... which US paid for not Mexico.

But what Mr Trump has actually built is far from what he promised at the start of his 2016 election campaign, when he pledged to build a concrete wall along the border's entire 2,000-mile length.
He later clarified that it would cover only half of that. And by the time of his State of the Union address in February this year, his pledge had been reduced to "substantially more than 500 miles" by January 2021.

He kept moving the goal posts.... Boarder Patrol like some of it... Democrats paid for that before Trump arrived...

Trump failed to hire Boarder Patrol he was given money to hire:

The tunnelling sensors are generally useless as I have shown... But the keep you happy...
1. The wall is built and works. Its paid for.
2. Don't you know how to read? Its a "wall", as promised.
3. Democrats didn't do anything, Trump totally re-designed the wall, so Border Patrol could see thru it.
4. The Border Patrol can do more with less with the big beautiful wall.

Trump's wall and deal with Mexico are keeping illegals crossing to a minimum.

Again it is a fence... here is a picture of them cutting through the multi billion dollar fence with tools from hardware store
View attachment 437347

But then they got smart and used razorwire...


It is just getting funny now...

Now it looks like they paid Mexico to build the wall


But it is not all bad, Bannon might go to jail for the wall...
The people who guard the border love the new wall because it is effective. Read some facts not bullshit:
"Wall, agents and technology have since proven most effective when used in the right combination to improve border security. Today, the area along the border near San Diego has a second layer of woven wire fence about 100 to 200 yards from that first fence to provide an enforcement zone for agents patrolling the border. With lighting, a state-of-the-art surveillance system, and a paved road that gives access to Border Patrol vehicles, agents respond more quickly and the flow of illegal aliens decreased even more. The same sector that annually caught more than 500,000 illegal aliens now apprehends about 27,000 illegal aliens each year. Similar efforts along the Arizona-Mexico border in the last 18 years saw corresponding success rates of cutting illegal crossings by 90-plus percent."
 
OMG, the TDS never ends.
Senile Joe Biden is about to be inaugurated and you're still whining about Trump. Trump is gone.
I voted for him twice, 2016 & 2020, and I'm not sorry.

Why won't senile Joe do a real press conference? You know why.
 
OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.
Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.
OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.
Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".
And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...
Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

Mexico was meant to pay for the wall...

One long wall is ineffective way patrol a border...

Even the Boarder Patrol wanted a 2 fences in built up area with a gap and electronic surveillance in that gap...

Was Mexico not paying for that?

Trump was the one painting a picture of massive caravans coming to the boarder just full of rapists and murders...

Again it is not a promise kept because Mexico didn't pay for it, it was actually taken from a housing budget for Military families... Outside certain area the wall was not needed and was better if drones were used...
1. Mexico could pay for the wall if congress implemented a "remittance tax" on money sent out of the US.

2. The border patrol overwhelmingly supports the wall:

3. A good border stops illegals, terrorists, drugs, and reduces crime throughout the US. There is no reason to have "open borders", unless you're a TDS democrat.

4. MS-13 is full of rapists and murderers

5. Drones are useless, they are not everywhere all the time like the wall. Drones don't apprehend intruders.
The wall has cameras and sensors to detect tunneling. Drones don't do that.

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if US invaded them as well... It didn't happen and was never going to happen, GOP held Congress and it didn't happen. Why? Cause it is a fucking stupid idea that on makes sense to people with simple minds (Why Remittance Taxes to Finance a Border Wall are a Bad Idea … for the US)

2.From your article.
"The NBPC’s survey, of more than 600 agents in two of the Border Patrol’s busiest sectors, found just the opposite: A stunning 89 percent of line agents say a “wall system in strategic locations is necessary to securing the border.” Just 7 percent disagreed."
The Democrats never said no wall everywhere, it was Trump that wanted a continuous wall (not a fence)... Boarder Patrol was the ones that got it back to a fence..

3. The open border was a Reagan idea, Democrats wanted a smart border which let in people who wanted to work and have the option to go home for off season. It is the GOP polices that keep them in US, that is why Reagan wanted open borders... Democrats want a regulated border... Trump wants a Wall...

4. MS-13 is a Gang that was setup in America.

5. For starters there is little to no Wall, you were promised a Wall and you got a fence, the fence can be cut through OR climbed...
Walls/Fences don't apprehend intruders.
As for Tunnelling, Are you that dumb... Tunnelling detectors work at best 25ft.. Look at the Gaza Strip Egypt boarder, it is a few miles long and there is 100s of tunnells
Israel equipment is the best in the world and it max at 32 feet... Mexico gangs have access to way more and better resources than Gaza Strip...
Can't believe you are so ignorant about tunnelling..

You have only shown how ignorant you are about broader security and Democrats position on it... Democrats have not only agreed for boarder fencing but have actually built it and paid for it with out Military families suffering... Trump's boarder wall was so bad that GOP couldn't even pay for it..
1. The wall is built, it works. The Border Patrol loves it, end of discussion.
2. 420 miles of wall built, 516 miles is the goal. Well done.
3. Nonsense. Democrats want open borders.
4. Who gives a fuck where MS-13 originated. Its an international criminal gang now.
5. Dumb? At least I know how to spell "tunnel" and "border".
Look at the old ineffective "wall", and the new improved wall. There is no comparison. It works well, that's all that matters.
View attachment 437282


The tunneling sensors are continuous, so your argument about sensors falls flat.

It's a fence, a friggin' fence. Rumps idea of a wall fell by the way for a lot of reasons, mainly, the US and Mexico,combined, could not afford to build his "Wall". But the funds were already figured in to build that Fence a 1.3 budge for 2006 and changed in 2017 to 1.4 billion adjusted for inflation. You can stop repeating Rumps lies anytime now. You've been conned by a conman.

Your TDS "opinion" means nothing.
The people who guard the border love the new wall because it is effective. Read some facts not bullshit:
Wall, agents and technology have since proven most effective when used in the right combination to improve border security. Today, the area along the border near San Diego has a second layer of woven wire fence about 100 to 200 yards from that first fence to provide an enforcement zone for agents patrolling the border. With lighting, a state-of-the-art surveillance system, and a paved road that gives access to Border Patrol vehicles, agents respond more quickly and the flow of illegal aliens decreased even more. The same sector that annually caught more than 500,000 illegal aliens now apprehends about 27,000 illegal aliens each year. Similar efforts along the Arizona-Mexico border in the last 18 years saw corresponding success rates of cutting illegal crossings by 90-plus percent.

420 miles of new wall is not a "con", it's a fact, and its working. Trump got it done, your welcome.

Sorry, but that ship has already sailed. Now you are going to have to figure out a way to keep the illegal workers inside the US. Lately, your "Wall" hasn't even slowed them down going home.
 
OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.
Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.
OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.
Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".
And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...
Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

Mexico was meant to pay for the wall...

One long wall is ineffective way patrol a border...

Even the Boarder Patrol wanted a 2 fences in built up area with a gap and electronic surveillance in that gap...

Was Mexico not paying for that?

Trump was the one painting a picture of massive caravans coming to the boarder just full of rapists and murders...

Again it is not a promise kept because Mexico didn't pay for it, it was actually taken from a housing budget for Military families... Outside certain area the wall was not needed and was better if drones were used...
1. Mexico could pay for the wall if congress implemented a "remittance tax" on money sent out of the US.

2. The border patrol overwhelmingly supports the wall:

3. A good border stops illegals, terrorists, drugs, and reduces crime throughout the US. There is no reason to have "open borders", unless you're a TDS democrat.

4. MS-13 is full of rapists and murderers

5. Drones are useless, they are not everywhere all the time like the wall. Drones don't apprehend intruders.
The wall has cameras and sensors to detect tunneling. Drones don't do that.

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if US invaded them as well... It didn't happen and was never going to happen, GOP held Congress and it didn't happen. Why? Cause it is a fucking stupid idea that on makes sense to people with simple minds (Why Remittance Taxes to Finance a Border Wall are a Bad Idea … for the US)

2.From your article.
"The NBPC’s survey, of more than 600 agents in two of the Border Patrol’s busiest sectors, found just the opposite: A stunning 89 percent of line agents say a “wall system in strategic locations is necessary to securing the border.” Just 7 percent disagreed."
The Democrats never said no wall everywhere, it was Trump that wanted a continuous wall (not a fence)... Boarder Patrol was the ones that got it back to a fence..

3. The open border was a Reagan idea, Democrats wanted a smart border which let in people who wanted to work and have the option to go home for off season. It is the GOP polices that keep them in US, that is why Reagan wanted open borders... Democrats want a regulated border... Trump wants a Wall...

4. MS-13 is a Gang that was setup in America.

5. For starters there is little to no Wall, you were promised a Wall and you got a fence, the fence can be cut through OR climbed...
Walls/Fences don't apprehend intruders.
As for Tunnelling, Are you that dumb... Tunnelling detectors work at best 25ft.. Look at the Gaza Strip Egypt boarder, it is a few miles long and there is 100s of tunnells
Israel equipment is the best in the world and it max at 32 feet... Mexico gangs have access to way more and better resources than Gaza Strip...
Can't believe you are so ignorant about tunnelling..

You have only shown how ignorant you are about broader security and Democrats position on it... Democrats have not only agreed for boarder fencing but have actually built it and paid for it with out Military families suffering... Trump's boarder wall was so bad that GOP couldn't even pay for it..
1. The wall is built, it works. The Border Patrol loves it, end of discussion.
2. 420 miles of wall built, 516 miles is the goal. Well done.
3. Nonsense. Democrats want open borders.
4. Who gives a fuck where MS-13 originated. Its an international criminal gang now.
5. Dumb? At least I know how to spell "tunnel" and "border".
Look at the old ineffective "wall", and the new improved wall. There is no comparison. It works well, that's all that matters.
View attachment 437282


The tunneling sensors are continuous, so your argument about sensors falls flat.

For starters it is a fence not a wall... which US paid for not Mexico.

But what Mr Trump has actually built is far from what he promised at the start of his 2016 election campaign, when he pledged to build a concrete wall along the border's entire 2,000-mile length.
He later clarified that it would cover only half of that. And by the time of his State of the Union address in February this year, his pledge had been reduced to "substantially more than 500 miles" by January 2021.

He kept moving the goal posts.... Boarder Patrol like some of it... Democrats paid for that before Trump arrived...

Trump failed to hire Boarder Patrol he was given money to hire:

The tunnelling sensors are generally useless as I have shown... But the keep you happy...
1. The wall is built and works. Its paid for.
2. Don't you know how to read? Its a "wall", as promised.
3. Democrats didn't do anything, Trump totally re-designed the wall, so Border Patrol could see thru it.
4. The Border Patrol can do more with less with the big beautiful wall.

Trump's wall and deal with Mexico are keeping illegals crossing to a minimum.

Again it is a fence... here is a picture of them cutting through the multi billion dollar fence with tools from hardware store
View attachment 437347

But then they got smart and used razorwire...


It is just getting funny now...

Now it looks like they paid Mexico to build the wall


But it is not all bad, Bannon might go to jail for the wall...
The people who guard the border love the new wall because it is effective. Read some facts not bullshit:
"Wall, agents and technology have since proven most effective when used in the right combination to improve border security. Today, the area along the border near San Diego has a second layer of woven wire fence about 100 to 200 yards from that first fence to provide an enforcement zone for agents patrolling the border. With lighting, a state-of-the-art surveillance system, and a paved road that gives access to Border Patrol vehicles, agents respond more quickly and the flow of illegal aliens decreased even more. The same sector that annually caught more than 500,000 illegal aliens now apprehends about 27,000 illegal aliens each year. Similar efforts along the Arizona-Mexico border in the last 18 years saw corresponding success rates of cutting illegal crossings by 90-plus percent."

It's a fence, not a wall. Damn, even Rump gave up on his stupid wall.
 
OMG, CNN and their TDS, it never ends.

Better to keep up the TDS than to look seriously at the Bidens like a real news outlet, huh?!

Do you mean like OAN, Newsmax and Fox that are having to do retractions for their crap reports? Looks to me like YOUR Real News is the fake news these days.
Harvard confirmed media bias against Trump. Who do you have saying FXN is biased fake news? That's right, no one.

Oh, you mean Harvard Kennedy School . Not Harvard University.
OK Harvard Kennedy School, it is the "public policy school of Harvard University", I assume like Wharton is Penn's business school. Its still part of Harvard University.

So I still have proof Harvard confirmed media bias of the MSM, and you don't have any such proof for FXN.

It's not connected with Harvard University. Yes, at one time it was but it's been decades since. Actually, it was never really part of Harvard University. It just shared some land with it. It's also gone through a number of name changes where Harvard wasn't in the title. Harvard University does not have a thing to do with anything that the Harvard Kennedy School says or does. In fact, Harvard Kennedy School is only a 2 year degree program. Damn, you really do need to learn the background of your BS Cites.
Harvard Kennedy School is a legitimate university. The professor in-charge of the study documented his methods and results. The results are NOT DISPUTED. Anyone watching the MSM can recognize fake and biased "news".
And it doesn't show bias...
It says the coverage was more negative than positive... They never mention Trump's actions...
If I take a dump at a press conference I don't expect positive coverage...
Trump in the first day started off with the crowd size story and Kelly Anne used 'Alternative Facts'...
That is why you get negative coverage... IF you are loosing a game by 50 points you don't expect commentators to be singing your praises...
Reporting Trump admin actions in a 95% negative way compared to the FXN reporting of about 50/50 proves bias.
Kelly Ann always argued her "alternate facts" to prove a positive outcome.
The southern wall is a good example. We want the wall to keep illegals and terrorists out as recommended by the Border Patrol. The MSM always paints the wall as racist. The truth is that democrats just want to let in more democrat voters dependent on government handouts. FXN reported the wall as a positive accomplishment, the MSM rails against it. I like Trump's list of "promises kept", democrats and the MSM don't like them. About 50% of the country voted for Trump, the urban plantations and their MSM are democrats. The MSM's 95% biaed "news" does not reflect or respect the viewership of the US population.

Mexico was meant to pay for the wall...

One long wall is ineffective way patrol a border...

Even the Boarder Patrol wanted a 2 fences in built up area with a gap and electronic surveillance in that gap...

Was Mexico not paying for that?

Trump was the one painting a picture of massive caravans coming to the boarder just full of rapists and murders...

Again it is not a promise kept because Mexico didn't pay for it, it was actually taken from a housing budget for Military families... Outside certain area the wall was not needed and was better if drones were used...
1. Mexico could pay for the wall if congress implemented a "remittance tax" on money sent out of the US.

2. The border patrol overwhelmingly supports the wall:

3. A good border stops illegals, terrorists, drugs, and reduces crime throughout the US. There is no reason to have "open borders", unless you're a TDS democrat.

4. MS-13 is full of rapists and murderers

5. Drones are useless, they are not everywhere all the time like the wall. Drones don't apprehend intruders.
The wall has cameras and sensors to detect tunneling. Drones don't do that.

1. Mexico could pay for the wall if US invaded them as well... It didn't happen and was never going to happen, GOP held Congress and it didn't happen. Why? Cause it is a fucking stupid idea that on makes sense to people with simple minds (Why Remittance Taxes to Finance a Border Wall are a Bad Idea … for the US)

2.From your article.
"The NBPC’s survey, of more than 600 agents in two of the Border Patrol’s busiest sectors, found just the opposite: A stunning 89 percent of line agents say a “wall system in strategic locations is necessary to securing the border.” Just 7 percent disagreed."
The Democrats never said no wall everywhere, it was Trump that wanted a continuous wall (not a fence)... Boarder Patrol was the ones that got it back to a fence..

3. The open border was a Reagan idea, Democrats wanted a smart border which let in people who wanted to work and have the option to go home for off season. It is the GOP polices that keep them in US, that is why Reagan wanted open borders... Democrats want a regulated border... Trump wants a Wall...

4. MS-13 is a Gang that was setup in America.

5. For starters there is little to no Wall, you were promised a Wall and you got a fence, the fence can be cut through OR climbed...
Walls/Fences don't apprehend intruders.
As for Tunnelling, Are you that dumb... Tunnelling detectors work at best 25ft.. Look at the Gaza Strip Egypt boarder, it is a few miles long and there is 100s of tunnells
Israel equipment is the best in the world and it max at 32 feet... Mexico gangs have access to way more and better resources than Gaza Strip...
Can't believe you are so ignorant about tunnelling..

You have only shown how ignorant you are about broader security and Democrats position on it... Democrats have not only agreed for boarder fencing but have actually built it and paid for it with out Military families suffering... Trump's boarder wall was so bad that GOP couldn't even pay for it..
1. The wall is built, it works. The Border Patrol loves it, end of discussion.
2. 420 miles of wall built, 516 miles is the goal. Well done.
3. Nonsense. Democrats want open borders.
4. Who gives a fuck where MS-13 originated. Its an international criminal gang now.
5. Dumb? At least I know how to spell "tunnel" and "border".
Look at the old ineffective "wall", and the new improved wall. There is no comparison. It works well, that's all that matters.
View attachment 437282


The tunneling sensors are continuous, so your argument about sensors falls flat.

For starters it is a fence not a wall... which US paid for not Mexico.

But what Mr Trump has actually built is far from what he promised at the start of his 2016 election campaign, when he pledged to build a concrete wall along the border's entire 2,000-mile length.
He later clarified that it would cover only half of that. And by the time of his State of the Union address in February this year, his pledge had been reduced to "substantially more than 500 miles" by January 2021.

He kept moving the goal posts.... Boarder Patrol like some of it... Democrats paid for that before Trump arrived...

Trump failed to hire Boarder Patrol he was given money to hire:

The tunnelling sensors are generally useless as I have shown... But the keep you happy...
1. The wall is built and works. Its paid for.
2. Don't you know how to read? Its a "wall", as promised.
3. Democrats didn't do anything, Trump totally re-designed the wall, so Border Patrol could see thru it.
4. The Border Patrol can do more with less with the big beautiful wall.

Trump's wall and deal with Mexico are keeping illegals crossing to a minimum.

Again it is a fence... here is a picture of them cutting through the multi billion dollar fence with tools from hardware store
View attachment 437347

But then they got smart and used razorwire...


It is just getting funny now...

Now it looks like they paid Mexico to build the wall


But it is not all bad, Bannon might go to jail for the wall...
The people who guard the border love the new wall because it is effective. Read some facts not bullshit:
"Wall, agents and technology have since proven most effective when used in the right combination to improve border security. Today, the area along the border near San Diego has a second layer of woven wire fence about 100 to 200 yards from that first fence to provide an enforcement zone for agents patrolling the border. With lighting, a state-of-the-art surveillance system, and a paved road that gives access to Border Patrol vehicles, agents respond more quickly and the flow of illegal aliens decreased even more. The same sector that annually caught more than 500,000 illegal aliens now apprehends about 27,000 illegal aliens each year. Similar efforts along the Arizona-Mexico border in the last 18 years saw corresponding success rates of cutting illegal crossings by 90-plus percent."

It's a fence, not a wall. Damn, even Rump gave up on his stupid wall.
Stupid posts. Just post lies with no link proving your points. Don't go away mad...
How is Trump giving up on the wall? Its nearing completion, duh.
 

Forum List

Back
Top