There is no mystery concerning constitutionally authorized citizenship in the United States. Anchor babies are not U.S. Citizens.

[johnwk]

Birthright citizenship is determined by where you are born, not by who your parents are.

The end.

Why do you make up shit?



Our United States Supreme Court noted in 1872 in the Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36: The phrase 'subject to its jurisdiction' was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States."

A few years after the above mentioned case, Richard Greisser born on American soil, whose father was a "German subject" at the time of Richard’s birth, was found to not be “. . . a citizen of the United States . . .” SOURCE

Stop making shit up.

 

[johnwk]

As for now, yes, anchor babies are citizens.

Only by federal policy, not by any law adopted by Congress's exclusive 14th Amendment, Section 5 authority granting United States citizenship to the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

They are citizens by fiat of the Supreme Court. End of subject.

Only the Court or by ratification of an amendment can that be changed.

No argument by case law has ever been made to end such citizenship.