Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Call it a ransom or call it what ever you want. Fact is, the hostages were released only after the plane carrying the cash landed.
Then and only then could the plane carrying the hostages depart. You liberals are so in denial/
So if it wasn't "ransom" why would there be anything to do with the hostages?Call it a ransom or call it what ever you want. Fact is, the hostages were released only after the plane carrying the cash landed.
Then and only then could the plane carrying the hostages depart. You liberals are so in denial/
See, you morons have a vested agenda to say that it was "ransom".......
Neglecting (because you are basically a stupid bunch) that it was smart of the Iranians to ensure that THEIR OWN MONEY was returned to them before keeping their part of the bargain...
.Quid pro quo...(look up what that means).
So if it wasn't "ransom" why would there be anything to do with the hostages?
Seems the two would be totally separate issues
JOBS! JOBS! JOBS!
False analogy.All good questions, but the left only believes and repeats the most current talking point issued by their master.
One hostage already said they weren't officially released until the money arrived. The return of hostages and receipt of the money go hand in hand. All cash, delivered at one time. Good question as to why each country hadn't returned the money instead of Obama having it all. He must have collected it for some reason and that must have taken some time since all that money had to be sent to him.
Let's try a [probably futile] example.......
Somehow you have $20 of mine, but I have a book of yours and I say to you, "I'll return your book once you pay me back that $20 you owe me:.......Now, if you do return that $20, did you just pay me RANSOM money to get your book back?
Looks good to ME and millions of other smart Americans!False analogy.All good questions, but the left only believes and repeats the most current talking point issued by their master.
One hostage already said they weren't officially released until the money arrived. The return of hostages and receipt of the money go hand in hand. All cash, delivered at one time. Good question as to why each country hadn't returned the money instead of Obama having it all. He must have collected it for some reason and that must have taken some time since all that money had to be sent to him.
Let's try a [probably futile] example.......
Somehow you have $20 of mine, but I have a book of yours and I say to you, "I'll return your book once you pay me back that $20 you owe me:.......Now, if you do return that $20, did you just pay me RANSOM money to get your book back?
Who cares? The money was Iran's to begin with. We didn't lose a dime in the transaction and gained the freedom of our 5 spies for FREE!So if it wasn't "ransom" why would there be anything to do with the hostages?Call it a ransom or call it what ever you want. Fact is, the hostages were released only after the plane carrying the cash landed.
Then and only then could the plane carrying the hostages depart. You liberals are so in denial/
See, you morons have a vested agenda to say that it was "ransom".......
Neglecting (because you are basically a stupid bunch) that it was smart of the Iranians to ensure that THEIR OWN MONEY was returned to them before keeping their part of the bargain...
.Quid pro quo...(look up what that means).
Seems the two would be totally separate issues
If you cannot recognize that nat4900 is using a logical fallacy to justify her position, then you are not a smart American.Looks good to ME and millions of other smart Americans!False analogy.All good questions, but the left only believes and repeats the most current talking point issued by their master.
One hostage already said they weren't officially released until the money arrived. The return of hostages and receipt of the money go hand in hand. All cash, delivered at one time. Good question as to why each country hadn't returned the money instead of Obama having it all. He must have collected it for some reason and that must have taken some time since all that money had to be sent to him.
Let's try a [probably futile] example.......
Somehow you have $20 of mine, but I have a book of yours and I say to you, "I'll return your book once you pay me back that $20 you owe me:.......Now, if you do return that $20, did you just pay me RANSOM money to get your book back?
Looks good to ME and millions of other smart Americans!
Give me an example of Nat's "logical fallacy."If you cannot recognize that nat4900 is using a logical fallacy to justify her position, then you are not a smart American.Looks good to ME and millions of other smart Americans!False analogy.All good questions, but the left only believes and repeats the most current talking point issued by their master.
One hostage already said they weren't officially released until the money arrived. The return of hostages and receipt of the money go hand in hand. All cash, delivered at one time. Good question as to why each country hadn't returned the money instead of Obama having it all. He must have collected it for some reason and that must have taken some time since all that money had to be sent to him.
Let's try a [probably futile] example.......
Somehow you have $20 of mine, but I have a book of yours and I say to you, "I'll return your book once you pay me back that $20 you owe me:.......Now, if you do return that $20, did you just pay me RANSOM money to get your book back?
.....and it is NOT on Obama's watch.....
The money received by Iran is NOT US or European or anyone else's money...It is IRANIAN money frozen in various banks.
The ONLY instance that we paid ransom for hostages occurred under Reagan's watch.....Check out the Iran-Contra affair, Ollie North's involvement, and Reagan's "I can't recall" statement during the investigation of the fraudulent affair..
Except Iran says Barry paid the ransom, Iran has been showing off the cash, Iran has been showing the video of the ransom being paid, and the hostages have reported a ransom was paid........and it is NOT on Obama's watch.....
The money received by Iran is NOT US or European or anyone else's money...It is IRANIAN money frozen in various banks.
The ONLY instance that we paid ransom for hostages occurred under Reagan's watch.....Check out the Iran-Contra affair, Ollie North's involvement, and Reagan's "I can't recall" statement during the investigation of the fraudulent affair..
Except Iran says Barry paid the ransom, Iran has been showing off the cash, Iran has been showing the video of the ransom being paid, and the hostages have reported a ransom was paid...
Obama serves it up to Iran on a silver platter...then you Obama ass-kissers want to blame the GOP for him doing it / for pointing out the idiot did it.Except Iran says Barry paid the ransom, Iran has been showing off the cash, Iran has been showing the video of the ransom being paid, and the hostages have reported a ransom was paid...
I would NOT expect less from the Iranians than to show a "win" over the U.S. for their internal consumption.....But then, you right wing morons in your Obama hatred are not much different than this country's foreign enemies.
.....and it is NOT on Obama's watch.....
The money received by Iran is NOT US or European or anyone else's money...It is IRANIAN money frozen in various banks.
The ONLY instance that we paid ransom for hostages occurred under Reagan's watch.....Check out the Iran-Contra affair, Ollie North's involvement, and Reagan's "I can't recall" statement during the investigation of the fraudulent affair..
