These Christian Swingers Like Sharing Bible Verses, Sex Partners

They are consenting adults and can do what they please. However, I don't think they should call themselves Christians - real Christians don't screw around.
According to the ten commandments, it is a sin to do what they are doing.

You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife.
 
Abraham, who fathered children by three different women, could perhaps be regarded as the first swinger in the Bible.

David is another.

Solomon yet another.

The difference, of course, between them and the clowns who are the subjects of this thread is that swinging in the days before Christ in the Bible was done not for pleasure, but for the explicitly-stated purposes of producing children.
The difference is that none of them were Christians. Polygamy was an OT thing, I'm not sure no pleasure was involved though. Christian swinger is an oxymoron since sexuality for the Christian is fairly well defined. I'm not a Christian and I don't care what they do but it is an obvious contradiction.
 
the shartridge family said:
Abraham, who fathered children by three different women, could perhaps be regarded as the first swinger in the Bible.

David is another.

Solomon yet another.

The difference, of course, between them and the clowns who are the subjects of this thread is that swinging in the days before Christ in the Bible was done not for pleasure, but for the explicitly-stated purposes of producing children.

iceweasel said:
The difference is that none of them were Christians. Polygamy was an OT thing, I'm not sure no pleasure was involved though. Christian swinger is an oxymoron since sexuality for the Christian is fairly well defined. I'm not a Christian and I don't care what they do but it is an obvious contradiction.

Yup.

Exactly.

They lived under Law.

Christians live under Grace. :thup:
 
They are consenting adults and can do what they please. However, I don't think they should call themselves Christians - real Christians don't screw around.

Self determination-----they can call themselves whatever they feel like. Shame on you for suggesting that they shouldn't do something.
 
Abraham, who fathered children by three different women, could perhaps be regarded as the first swinger in the Bible.

David is another.

Solomon yet another.

The difference, of course, between them and the clowns who are the subjects of this thread is that swinging in the days before Christ in the Bible was done not for pleasure, but for the explicitly-stated purposes of producing children.


Agreed, let's not forget to mention mention Lot;

'Our father is getting old, and there are no men in the whole world to marry us so that we can have children. Come on, let’s get our father drunk, so that we can sleep with him and have children by him.' (Genesis 19:31 - 32).
 
Funny to me how the libs are spouting their bullshit about it being none of ourbusiness. Except they are the ones making it our business by telling the world on the FUCKING NEWS how ok it is and telling us in public about their insidious lifestyle.

What I cannot tell is if the godless liberals are blaming me for shedding light on the perverse nature of the story or are they telling the assholes to keep their bullshit to themselves.

Fucking liberals
 
Funny to me how the libs are spouting their bullshit about it being none of ourbusiness. Except they are the ones making it our business by telling the world on the FUCKING NEWS how ok it is and telling us in public about their insidious lifestyle.

What I cannot tell is if the godless liberals are blaming me for shedding light on the perverse nature of the story or are they telling the assholes to keep their bullshit to themselves.

Fucking liberals

Bet we can at least all agree that ewww, they sure are some fugly motherfuckers. :badgrin:
 
Funny to me how the libs are spouting their bullshit about it being none of ourbusiness. Except they are the ones making it our business by telling the world on the FUCKING NEWS how ok it is and telling us in public about their insidious lifestyle.

What I cannot tell is if the godless liberals are blaming me for shedding light on the perverse nature of the story or are they telling the assholes to keep their bullshit to themselves.

Fucking liberals

Redundent. Obviously if they are liberals, they are fucking liberals. Then again, if they are conservatives, then they are fucking conservatives.
 
Funny to me how the libs are spouting their bullshit about it being none of ourbusiness. Except they are the ones making it our business by telling the world on the FUCKING NEWS how ok it is and telling us in public about their insidious lifestyle.

What I cannot tell is if the godless liberals are blaming me for shedding light on the perverse nature of the story or are they telling the assholes to keep their bullshit to themselves.

Fucking liberals

Redundent. Obviously if they are liberals, they are fucking liberals. Then again, if they are conservatives, then they are fucking conservatives.

I am talking about the pieces of shit liberals on here commenting on how it is none of our business what their "cool hip" lifestyle is.

Meaning, it is typical of the left wing piece of shit.

Example of the quotes.

Its not being "unfaithful" when both people are honestly aware of all of each other's polygamous activities within the relationship.

Or what about when the actual relationship is between more than one person?

Can your mind even comprehend a small coven where all the humans are sexually and spiritually attracted to each other, and embrace each other as lovers. Real love, but lust as well. Where every human is loyal to each other, the coven, and the coven alone. No bfs or gfs or husbands or wives, but a similar relationship between every human of that coven.

It does happen, you know ;-)

What powerful rituals, and what mindblowing sex can be experienced. What loyalty can be found. What powerful spiritual experiences can be explored.




Sounds like a simple matter between consenting adults and if we're not interested in joining in, it's none of our business.
A non-issue.

^^^ Exact example. Check out the cool hipster. Trying to convey his cool liberal stand. The moron does not notice that it is not me putting the issue on the news making it our business by trying to make it seem OK to live that lifestyle and then claim to be faithful to Christ. It is me however commenting on their public display and their pathetic claims that they are making.
 
A Bible-thumping couple in Florida is changing the way people think about their faith — with a hookup website for devout Christian swingers!

Cristy Parave and her husband, Dean, are the unashamed bodybuilding Jesus lovers bringing couples together and introducing them to their wild lifestyle of swapping sex partners and Bible verses, Barcroft Media reports.

When the fitness gurus got sick of finding swingers online who couldn’t meet their standards, they decided to set up their own swinging network — FitnessSwingers.com. They have been touring the US ever since, meeting couples who want to join in and indulge in their holy promiscuity.

The couple first met at a bodybuilding competition, and simply don’t care what people say about their swinging. They firmly believe that despite their unfaithful marriages, the big guy upstairs doesn’t have a care in the world that they’re defiling their sacred vows.

These Christian swingers like sharing Bible verses sex partners New York Post




----------------------------------

Well, just another group of delusional morons who think that if it feels good, then it must be righteous bullshit.



Porn-Again Christians Reach Out to Unsaved Pornography Addicts
Porn Again's Latest Feature (right) is Based on the Apocalyptic Best Seller by Tim LaHaye entitled Left Behind.

Porn Again Christians Reach Out to Save Pornography Addicts
 
A Bible-thumping couple in Florida is changing the way people think about their faith — with a hookup website for devout Christian swingers!

Cristy Parave and her husband, Dean, are the unashamed bodybuilding Jesus lovers bringing couples together and introducing them to their wild lifestyle of swapping sex partners and Bible verses, Barcroft Media reports.

When the fitness gurus got sick of finding swingers online who couldn’t meet their standards, they decided to set up their own swinging network — FitnessSwingers.com. They have been touring the US ever since, meeting couples who want to join in and indulge in their holy promiscuity.

The couple first met at a bodybuilding competition, and simply don’t care what people say about their swinging. They firmly believe that despite their unfaithful marriages, the big guy upstairs doesn’t have a care in the world that they’re defiling their sacred vows.

These Christian swingers like sharing Bible verses sex partners New York Post




----------------------------------

Well, just another group of delusional morons who think that if it feels good, then it must be righteous bullshit.



What a friend they have in jesus!!! Gives a whole new meaning to jesus is cuming again!!1
 
the shartridge family said:
Abraham, who fathered children by three different women, could perhaps be regarded as the first swinger in the Bible.

David is another.

Solomon yet another.

The difference, of course, between them and the clowns who are the subjects of this thread is that swinging in the days before Christ in the Bible was done not for pleasure, but for the explicitly-stated purposes of producing children.

iceweasel said:
The difference is that none of them were Christians. Polygamy was an OT thing, I'm not sure no pleasure was involved though. Christian swinger is an oxymoron since sexuality for the Christian is fairly well defined. I'm not a Christian and I don't care what they do but it is an obvious contradiction.

Yup.

Exactly.

They lived under Law.

Christians live under Grace. :thup:


So grace gets to be on top?
 
Abraham, who fathered children by three different women, could perhaps be regarded as the first swinger in the Bible.

David is another.

Solomon yet another.

The difference, of course, between them and the clowns who are the subjects of this thread is that swinging in the days before Christ in the Bible was done not for pleasure, but for the explicitly-stated purposes of producing children.

You really might want to rethink that last line. Just because a Bible verse somewhat supports that idea, reality was much different.
 
Funny to me how the libs are spouting their bullshit about it being none of ourbusiness. Except they are the ones making it our business by telling the world on the FUCKING NEWS how ok it is and telling us in public about their insidious lifestyle.

What I cannot tell is if the godless liberals are blaming me for shedding light on the perverse nature of the story or are they telling the assholes to keep their bullshit to themselves.

Fucking liberals
Are you supposed to be a Christian? Why are you so angry? Do you think Jesus would appreciate your tone? What about 'the meek shall inherit the Earth.'
 
They are consenting adults and can do what they please. However, I don't think they should call themselves Christians - real Christians don't screw around.
According to the ten commandments, it is a sin to do what they are doing.

You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife.

I bet they are the same sort of 'Christians' who are against gay marriage because the Bible says its wrong.
 
Adultery and coverting thy neighbor's wife isn't what's happening in swinging though. Isn't cheating if your partner's there with the other spouse's spouse, nor is it coveting. Might strictly interpreted be permissable, but it's still kinda...I dunno. Objectionable for non-Scriptural reasons.

Sex without love and mutual involvement is wrong. For me. Might be ok for other people, but having had the opportunity I've discovered I need love and at least the belief I am loved by the other person to enjoy sex with them. Absnet love, God made my arms perfectly able to reach my joy department I like to think for a reason. :)
 
Adultery and coverting thy neighbor's wife isn't what's happening in swinging though. Isn't cheating if your partner's there with the other spouse's spouse, nor is it coveting. Might strictly interpreted be permissable, but it's still kinda...I dunno. Objectionable for non-Scriptural reasons.

Sex without love and mutual involvement is wrong. For me. Might be ok for other people, but having had the opportunity I've discovered I need love and at least the belief I am loved by the other person to enjoy sex with them. Absnet love, God made my arms perfectly able to reach my joy department I like to think for a reason. :)

People are different....that's for sure.
 
They are consenting adults and can do what they please. However, I don't think they should call themselves Christians - real Christians don't screw around.
According to the ten commandments, it is a sin to do what they are doing.

You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife.
Yes Esmerelda, your bible tells you that it's adultery. However, the world is comprised of billions of other people with beliefs that are not of the Abrahamic faith as well as many millions who are of no religion and do not share your either your beliefs, or your bible's teachings.
To me, it's just two or more couples sharing intimacy. It's not my preference, but it's fine for those who are into it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top