This will go to the USSC

[otto105]

Don't hold your breath waiting for JackOfNoTrades to tell you neither. He can't deal with it.

But don't worry, the exposure of the theft of 2020 election is coming.

Actually, no many were tossed for a lack of evidence or plaintiff not asserting fraud.

You're simple wrong.

 

[jc456]

No it won't.

What?

 

[jc456]

Oh sorry, America.

You CCP vermin don't grasp the whole America thing.

They use sickles

 

[Uncensored2008]

There's a province in Ghina that is PS and has a NAZI court?

No idea Nazi.

I do know that the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court was overtaken by Nazi cvnts

 

[otto105]

No idea Nazi.

I do know that the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court was overtaken by Nazi cvnts

Godwins Law....I win.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

And it will be appealed from there regardless of which side wins. That is the game that is played.

It cannot be appealed from there. The case is about the interpretation of the PA Constitution. No matter which way the PA SC rules, that is the end of it. the SCOTUS does not have the power to tell a state SC they misinterpreted their own constitution.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The PA Supreme Court will most likely reverse the ruling and it will go to the USSC.

It cannot be appealed from there. The case is about the interpretation of the PA Constitution. No matter which way the PA SC rules, that is the end of it. the SCOTUS does not have the power to tell a state SC they misinterpreted their own constitution.

 

[OldLady]

I would not be surprised if it goes all the way to SCOTUS and is ruled unconstitutional. But Biden will still be president

Why would a question on a state's constitution go to the Supreme Court?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It cannot be appealed from there. The case is about the interpretation of the PA Constitution. No matter which way the PA SC rules, that is the end of it. the SCOTUS does not have the power to tell a state SC they misinterpreted their own constitution.

Bullshit! It is done all the time. Bush V. Gore is probably the most famous example.

 

[Darkwind]

It cannot be appealed from there. The case is about the interpretation of the PA Constitution. No matter which way the PA SC rules, that is the end of it. the SCOTUS does not have the power to tell a state SC they misinterpreted their own constitution.

Tell that to California when they voted for Prop 8 and were shot down by the Feds.

 

[Dadoalex]

Court finds Pennsylvania mail-in voting law unconstitutional, appeal anticipated

(WHTM) – The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has found the commonwealth’s no-excuse mail-in voting law, Act 77, is unconstitutional. According to court documents, 14 members of the P…

www.abc27.com

PA mail voting unconstitutional. About time. Vote in person or by absentee ballot, period.

First

Mail in voting and absentee ballots are 100% the same thing.

Second

This will be overturned by the PA supremes.

And finally

Not sure what the standing would be on going to the SCOTUS unless the PA Supremes uphold. Such a ruling could put PA's constitution under the SCOTUS lens because upholding would have the effect of denying the vote to 10s of thousands of qualified voters.

What do you think the cause would be to take this to the SCOTUS if the decision is reversed? AS in what part of the Constitution or federal law would the reversal violate?

 

[Dadoalex]

Tell that to California when they voted for Prop 8 and were shot down by the Feds.

Why do you parade your ignorance.

Prop 8 was a clear violation of the 14th amendment.

BUT

Let us reverse the intent of prop 8 to allow for same sex marriage.
Now have the CA Supremes uphold the law and what is the cause for appeal to the feds? What part of the Constitution or Federal law is violated at that point?

Oh, BTW...It was a clearly conservative court that finally killed prop 8.

 

[Darkwind]

Why do you parade your ignorance.

Prop 8 was a clear violation of the 14th amendment.

BUT

Let us reverse the intent of prop 8 to allow for same sex marriage.
Now have the CA Supremes uphold the law and what is the cause for appeal to the feds? What part of the Constitution or Federal law is violated at that point?

Oh, BTW...It was a clearly conservative court that finally killed prop 8.

The only ignorance is yours. The PEOPLE of California voted to pass an AMENDMENT to their Constitution.

The FEDS shot it down. Which is the point I was argueing.

Now, STFU.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Bullshit! It is done all the time. Bush V. Gore is probably the most famous example.

SCTOUS found that Florida had violated the Equal Protection Clause in ordering a partial recount of the 2000. No such thing is at play here

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Tell that to California when they voted for Prop 8 and were shot down by the Feds.

That was because Prop 8 violated the US Constitution.

In this case the that is not in play, we know that mail in voting does not violate the US Constitution.

The only question is does it violate the PA Constitution. The SCTOUS will not tell a state SC they were wrong about their own constitution, they do not have that power

 

[alang1216]

I would not be surprised if it goes all the way to SCOTUS and is ruled unconstitutional. But Biden will still be president

As he should be. There is nothing in this or any of the GOP legal challenges that claim fraud. If all these voters had been forced to go to the polls there is no doubt they would have cast their votes the same way and Biden would still have won. Now if the goal of the GOP is to disenfranchise a select portion of the electorate, that might change the outcome but that would be the fraud they are looking for.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Godwins Law....I win.

Go try and cash that in for a free drink at the bar, Nazi.

 

[Uncensored2008]

It cannot be appealed from there. The case is about the interpretation of the PA Constitution. No matter which way the PA SC rules, that is the end of it. the SCOTUS does not have the power to tell a state SC they misinterpreted their own constitution.

They can rule if the PASC violated the United States Constitution.

You may have contempt for the document, but 5 justices support it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Why would a question on a state's constitution go to the Supreme Court?

Oh, this is in the KOS talking points.

I should have know when Trolling Traitor posted it...

 

[Harpy Eagle]

hey can rule if the PASC violated the United States Constitution.

On what grounds? That is not even the question before the courts. That has not been the claim. The only claim is that the law on mail-in-voting violated the PA Constitution.