Thou Shalt Not Question the King - Adam Kokesh held on "Armed Sedition" charge...

[The2ndAmendment]

Enjoy slavery!

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=AKu2wVrtUPI#at=77[/ame]

» Kokesh Held Without Bond, Possibly Charged with Armed Sedition Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!


Listen to this CNN spin - "A menacing terrorist" lololol

 

[Moonglow]

you left out the charges of drugs and guns.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

you left out the charges of drugs and guns.

Omg, he had some mushrooms, must send Two military helicopters, four armored vehicles and 120 federal agents!

Shut up kid.

 

[Moonglow]

and sedition may be charged. Yet to get a public defender, one must plea not guilty to be given or afforded a public defender

 

[Moonglow]

you left out the charges of drugs and guns.

Omg, he had some mushrooms, must send Two military helicopters, four armored vehicles and 120 federal agents!

Shut up kid.

make me

 

[TheOldSchool]

What an idiot. I hope he at least planned on making money off of this.

 

[Moonglow]

The raid on his home, led by U.S. Park Police, stemmed from a video he posted online of himself loading a shotgun on Freedom Plaza in Washington, D.C.

Possession of Schedule I and II drugs in Virginia is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a maximum $2,500 fine.

It is unclear whether federal authorities in Washington will charge Kokesh in connection to the gun loading video. Carrying a loaded firearm in the District is punishable by up to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine. The U.S. Park Police is handling that portion of the investigation.

» Kokesh Held Without Bond, Potentially Facing ?Armed Sedition? Charge Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
Why would he load a firearm in the DC by federal buildings?

 

[National Socialist]

He is a patriot.

 

[Moonglow]

If you would get your news from a better source it would help.

 

[snowdenisahero]

The Government will not tolerate any civil disobedience that tries to demonstrate we as a free people still have power, because we don't have any power any longer. The Government needs to get put in it's fucking place.

 

[Moonglow]

really, there are many protest in DC without violence or weapons.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

What an idiot. I hope he at least planned on making money off of this.

He certainly planned on being arrested, he said it would be a "Rosa Parks Moment."

However, he never expected (nor did anyone else) that they would come with full military force. The jury should automatically acquit him simply for the method in which he was apprehended, otherwise it sets a HORRIFIC precedent for future activists who engage in CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE.

 

[Moonglow]

If you expect to be shit upon, it's usually going to be shitty.

 

[snowdenisahero]

What an idiot. I hope he at least planned on making money off of this.

He certainly planned on being arrested, he said it would be a "Rosa Parks Moment."

However, he never expected (nor did anyone else) that they would come with full military force. The jury should automatically acquit him simply for the method in which he was apprehended, otherwise it sets a HORRIFIC precedent for future activists who engage in CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE.

The Government wants this precedent set. Just like they want it set with snowden. They want everyone to just obey, pay their taxes and shut up. This is all related to what the Government is becoming, which is our rulers. Anyone who doesn't see that is an idiot or a Government bootlicker. What's scary is that the AMerican military and American police force are being brainwashed into going along with all of this, and your normal average everyday citizen who just wants to go to starbucks doesn't have a clue what's really happening right in front of their eyes. Then you have people on this forum (and countless other political forums) who are either stupid, trolls, or government people posting in favor of all this Government control and power over themselves. No one likes to be told hat to do or be ruled over and the ones on here who are championing this are definitely Government people watching these forums and posting in them. It's in our nature to fight back and want to be autonomous. Just about every realizes traffic cops are scum and only there to generate revenue for the state. It's all a big fucking pyramid scheme and we the people are at the bottom paying to build their pyramid bigger, taller and stronger.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

He made a conscious decision to violate a KNOWN law that is enforceable and Constitutional. Then he was stupid enough to have illegal drugs at his home. This guy is short a couple bricks from a full load.

 

[National Socialist]

He made a conscious decision to violate a KNOWN law that is enforceable and Constitutional. Then he was stupid enough to have illegal drugs at his home. This guy is short a couple bricks from a full load.

Actually no gun law other than the 2nd amendment is legal or constitutional.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

What an idiot. I hope he at least planned on making money off of this.

He certainly planned on being arrested, he said it would be a "Rosa Parks Moment."

However, he never expected (nor did anyone else) that they would come with full military force. The jury should automatically acquit him simply for the method in which he was apprehended, otherwise it sets a HORRIFIC precedent for future activists who engage in CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE.

The Government wants this precedent set. Just like they want it set with snowden. They want everyone to just obey, pay their taxes and shut up. This is all related to what the Government is becoming, which is our rulers. Anyone who doesn't see that is an idiot or a Government bootlicker. What's scary is that the AMerican military and American police force are being brainwashed into going along with all of this, and your normal average everyday citizen who just wants to go to starbucks doesn't have a clue what's really happening right in front of their eyes. Then you have people on this forum (and countless other political forums) who are either stupid, trolls, or government people posting in favor of all this Government control and power over themselves. No one likes to be told hat to do or be ruled over and the ones on here who are championing this are definitely Government people watching these forums and posting in them. It's in our nature to fight back and want to be autonomous. Just about every realizes traffic cops are scum and only there to generate revenue for the state. It's all a big fucking pyramid scheme and we the people are at the bottom paying to build their pyramid bigger, taller and stronger.

The Department of Justice even admits that they have hired people to "interact with the web."

 

[RetiredGySgt]

He made a conscious decision to violate a KNOWN law that is enforceable and Constitutional. Then he was stupid enough to have illegal drugs at his home. This guy is short a couple bricks from a full load.

Actually no gun law other than the 2nd amendment is legal or constitutional.

You would be wrong. The Supreme Court has ruled that reasonable restrictions are Constitutional. No one has challenged DC on the loaded weapon in public law. Which means until it is challenged and the Courts accept it the law is not only enforceable but Constitutional.

If this guy thought the law was not he should have challenged it in Court. Ohh wait, he doesn't live in DC and so has no grounds to challenge it in Court.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

He made a conscious decision to violate a KNOWN law that is enforceable and Constitutional. Then he was stupid enough to have illegal drugs at his home. This guy is short a couple bricks from a full load.

Actually no gun law other than the 2nd amendment is legal or constitutional.

You would be wrong. The Supreme Court has ruled that reasonable restrictions are Constitutional. No one has challenged DC on the loaded weapon in public law. Which means until it is challenged and the Courts accept it the law is not only enforceable but Constitutional.

If this guy thought the law was not he should have challenged it in Court. Ohh wait, he doesn't live in DC and so has no grounds to challenge it in Court.

The Supreme Snort also upheld Jim Crow laws.

Martin Luther King:

One may well ask: "How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?" The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that "an unjust law is no law at all."

Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust. All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority. Segregation, to use the terminology of the Jewish philosopher Martin Buber, substitutes an "I it" relationship for an "I thou" relationship and ends up relegating persons to the status of things. Hence segregation is not only politically, economically and sociologically unsound, it is morally wrong and sinful. Paul Tillich has said that sin is separation. Is not segregation an existential expression of man's tragic separation, his awful estrangement, his terrible sinfulness? Thus it is that I can urge men to obey the 1954 decision of the Supreme Court, for it is morally right; and I can urge them to disobey segregation ordinances, for they are morally wrong.

Let us consider a more concrete example of just and unjust laws. An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself. This is difference made legal. By the same token, a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow and that it is willing to follow itself. This is sameness made legal. Let me give another explanation. A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that, as a result of being denied the right to vote, had no part in enacting or devising the law. Who can say that the legislature of Alabama which set up that state's segregation laws was democratically elected? Throughout Alabama all sorts of devious methods are used to prevent Negroes from becoming registered voters, and there are some counties in which, even though Negroes constitute a majority of the population, not a single Negro is registered. Can any law enacted under such circumstances be considered democratically structured?

Sometimes a law is just on its face and unjust in its application. For instance, I have been arrested on a charge of parading without a permit. Now, there is nothing wrong in having an ordinance which requires a permit for a parade. But such an ordinance becomes unjust when it is used to maintain segregation and to deny citizens the First-Amendment privilege of peaceful assembly and protest.

I hope you are able to see the distinction I am trying to point out. In no sense do I advocate evading or defying the law, as would the rabid segregationist. That would lead to anarchy. One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty. I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law.

Of course, there is nothing new about this kind of civil disobedience. It was evidenced sublimely in the refusal of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego to obey the laws of Nebuchadnezzar, on the ground that a higher moral law was at stake. It was practiced superbly by the early Christians, who were willing to face hungry lions and the excruciating pain of chopping blocks rather than submit to certain unjust laws of the Roman Empire. To a degree, academic freedom is a reality today because Socrates practiced civil disobedience. In our own nation, the Boston Tea Party represented a massive act of civil disobedience.

We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was "legal" and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was "illegal." It was "illegal" to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany. Even so, I am sure that, had I lived in Germany at the time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers. If today I lived in a Communist country where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I would openly advocate disobeying that country's antireligious laws.

 

[National Socialist]

He made a conscious decision to violate a KNOWN law that is enforceable and Constitutional. Then he was stupid enough to have illegal drugs at his home. This guy is short a couple bricks from a full load.

Actually no gun law other than the 2nd amendment is legal or constitutional.

You would be wrong. The Supreme Court has ruled that reasonable restrictions are Constitutional. No one has challenged DC on the loaded weapon in public law. Which means until it is challenged and the Courts accept it the law is not only enforceable but Constitutional.

If this guy thought the law was not he should have challenged it in Court. Ohh wait, he doesn't live in DC and so has no grounds to challenge it in Court.

OOHHHAHHHHHH a bunch of activist judges think they know what the constitution means and is meant to say...color me shocked...I will stick by what the constitution actually says and I don't even prefer the constitution to the AOC...but its the law of the land for now.