Three Big Benghazi Questions

[tinydancer]

Most on the clueless partisan right fail to ask the most important question:

Is there any tangible, objective, documented, non-partisan evidence at all?

The answer, of course, is ‘no.’

Bull shit. There is a great amount of non partisan evidence. Have you just awoken from a coma?

How much do you want me to unload on you? I'd be more than happy to give you hours of reading and links.

Let's start with actual screen shots of the changes made from a report that included "terror attacks" to the final version of the Benghazi attack which completely omits "terror attack" and only blames the video, shall we?

Senior administration officials, however, sought to obscure the emerging picture and downplay the significance of attacks that killed a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.

The frantic process that produced the changes to the talking points took place over a 24-hour period just one day before Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, made her now-famous appearances on the Sunday television talk shows.

The discussions involved senior officials from the State Department, the National Security Council, the CIA, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the White House.

The Benghazi Talking Points | The Weekly Standard

And if the Weekly Standard doesn't do it for you; how about ABC news?

Exclusive: Benghazi Talking Points Underwent 12 Revisions, Scrubbed of Terror Reference

Exclusive: Benghazi Talking Points Underwent 12 Revisions, Scrubbed of Terror Reference - ABC News

 

[Dot Com]

1. Why did Obama leave the Consulate Unguarded?

2. Why didn't send help as soon as he knew it was under siege?

3. Why did he knowingly lie about the nature of the attack?

You couldn’t have asked your ‘questions’ in one of the scores of other Benghazi threads?

There’s nothing new here, nothing to warrant yet another thread.

they getting close to 400 threads now?

Fox & Friends, am radio, & drudge must really be pushing it 24/7

 

[tinydancer]

The kooks have a sad that Jodi Arias and 3 Kidnapped Women happened right around their big day. Took all the media wind out of their sails. Only the cult cares about it now.

Of course, the kooks can't even come up with a coherent conspiracy theory. Or keep a single consistent theory for more than an hour, for that matter.

If Obama wanted an election boost, he just had to bomb the shit out of some brown people. Benghazi gave him the perfect excuse to do that, and Americans would have adored him for it (except for the many Republicans who would have sided with the terrorists over President Obama.)

So, Obama does the opposite of what would give him an election boost. And by wingnut logic, that means he was after an election boost. Wingnut logic is clearly far beyond our mere earth logic.

Dream on that this story is going away. The left wing media is now being forced to commit random acts of journalism.

And your claim that these accusations are based on conspiracy theories is so out to lunch.
Put down the bong for crying out loud.

Note the date:

Exclusive: Benghazi Talking Points Underwent 12 Revisions, Scrubbed of Terror Reference

May 10, 2013 6:33am

When it became clear last fall that the CIA’s now discredited Benghazi talking points were flawed, the White House said repeatedly the documents were put together almost entirely by the intelligence community, but White House documents reviewed by Congress suggest a different story.

ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they were extensively edited as they evolved from the drafts first written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before she appeared on five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.

 

[chikenwing]

Most on the clueless partisan right fail to ask the most important question:

Is there any tangible, objective, documented, non-partisan evidence at all?

The answer, of course, is ‘no.’[/QUOTE

If that is your position,then you live in a vacuum and refuse reality.

why did they lie not once but many times,and that has been proven the video bull shit is one big ass lie. They knew from the top down that it was an attack by a know terrorist group that day.

Don't be an ass and blindly protect people that care nothing for you.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

1. Why did Obama leave the Consulate Unguarded?

2. Why didn't send help as soon as he knew it was under siege?

3. Why did he knowingly lie about the nature of the attack?

1: Did not happen that way

2: Help? How? Info is needed before help is sent. Situations need to be assessed in the real world

3: No one lied

and cons are hilariously entertaining when they have their very own circle jerk threads

 

[blackhawk]

The lefts idea of addressing Benghazi.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Three Man Dates walk into a bar, Ben Dover, Ben Gay and Ben Ghazi strike up a conversation about right wing loons...

Benghazi and Fast and Furious hearings produce nothing, but they do energize an angry spiteful and hateful base

 

[tinydancer]

1. Why did Obama leave the Consulate Unguarded?

2. Why didn't send help as soon as he knew it was under siege?

3. Why did he knowingly lie about the nature of the attack?

1: Did not happen that way

2: Help? How? Info is needed before help is sent. Situations need to be assessed in the real world

3: No one lied

and cons are hilariously entertaining when they have their very own circle jerk threads

Not as funny as you libs trying to defend the repeated lies from the White House and State Department that it was a "disgusting video" that led to a protest gone wild.

The Obama White House: Home of the Whopper.

#1 Militia Hired by State Dept. Warned It Wouldn’t Protect Stevens’ Movements in Benghazi
May 1, 2013

Militia Hired by State Dept. Warned It Wouldn?t Protect Stevens? Movements in Benghazi | CNS News

#2 Consulate and American citizens under attack should have been good enough

#3 The lie was that a "video" caused the attack on the Consulate. A repeated lie. They knew from the get go that this was a terror attack.

Exclusive: Benghazi Talking Points Underwent 12 Revisions, Scrubbed of Terror Reference

From that article:

Summaries of White House and State Department emails — some of which were first published by Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard — show that the State Department had extensive input into the editing of the talking points.

State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland raised specific objections to this paragraph drafted by the CIA in its earlier versions of the talking points:

“The Agency has produced numerous pieces on the threat of extremists linked to al-Qa’ida in Benghazi and eastern Libya. These noted that, since April, there have been at least five other attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi by unidentified assailants, including the June attack against the British Ambassador’s convoy. We cannot rule out the individuals has previously surveilled the U.S. facilities, also contributing to the efficacy of the attacks.”

In an email to officials at the White House and the intelligence agencies, State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland took issue with including that information because it “could be abused by members [of Congress] to beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings, so why would we want to feed that either? Concerned …”

The paragraph was entirely deleted.

Exclusive: Benghazi Talking Points Underwent 12 Revisions, Scrubbed of Terror Reference - ABC News

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

1. Why did Obama leave the Consulate Unguarded?

2. Why didn't send help as soon as he knew it was under siege?

3. Why did he knowingly lie about the nature of the attack?

1: Did not happen that way

2: Help? How? Info is needed before help is sent. Situations need to be assessed in the real world

3: No one lied

and cons are hilariously entertaining when they have their very own circle jerk threads

Not as funny as...

nor as boring as most all of your crazy-assed postings

 

[Erand7899]

The kooks have a sad that Jodi Arias and 3 Kidnapped Women happened right around their big day. Took all the media wind out of their sails. Only the cult cares about it now.

Of course, the kooks can't even come up with a coherent conspiracy theory. Or keep a single consistent theory for more than an hour, for that matter.

If Obama wanted an election boost, he just had to bomb the shit out of some brown people. Benghazi gave him the perfect excuse to do that, and Americans would have adored him for it (except for the many Republicans who would have sided with the terrorists over President Obama.)

So, Obama does the opposite of what would give him an election boost. And by wingnut logic, that means he was after an election boost. Wingnut logic is clearly far beyond our mere earth logic.

Your logic is non existant. Obama wasn't looking to get an election boost out of Benghazi, he was trying to defuse an election bomb.

It would have been hard to continue the election theme that Obama had killed Osama and had Al Quada on the ropes, right after Al Quada had hit us hard and killed an Ambassador and three others.

It would have been hard to convince voters that Obama was competent after he ignored warnings about Benghasi, failed to provide adequate protection, and then failed to send a rescue party in an attempt to save their lives.

It would have been hard to explain jetting off to Vegas and a big fundraiser, after a hard hit by Al Quada.

So, they lied to the American people, and now the lies are unraveling.

 

[freedombecki]

The kooks have a sad that Jodi Arias and 3 Kidnapped Women happened right around their big day. Took all the media wind out of their sails. Only the cult cares about it now.

Of course, the kooks can't even come up with a coherent conspiracy theory. Or keep a single consistent theory for more than an hour, for that matter.

If Obama wanted an election boost, he just had to bomb the shit out of some brown people. Benghazi gave him the perfect excuse to do that, and Americans would have adored him for it (except for the many Republicans who would have sided with the terrorists over President Obama.)

So, Obama does the opposite of what would give him an election boost. And by wingnut logic, that means he was after an election boost. Wingnut logic is clearly far beyond our mere earth logic.

Dream on that this story is going away. The left wing media is now being forced to commit random acts of journalism.

And your claim that these accusations are based on conspiracy theories is so out to lunch.
Put down the bong for crying out loud.

Note the date:

Exclusive: Benghazi Talking Points Underwent 12 Revisions, Scrubbed of Terror Reference

May 10, 2013 6:33am

When it became clear last fall that the CIA’s now discredited Benghazi talking points were flawed, the White House said repeatedly the documents were put together almost entirely by the intelligence community, but White House documents reviewed by Congress suggest a different story.

ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they were extensively edited as they evolved from the drafts first written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before she appeared on five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.

"The left wing media is now being forced to commit random acts of journalism."​

TD, that deserves to be engraved on a brass placque and sent to every University President whose school harbors one of Journalism as a reminder of how unhappy Americans are with the sleazy job of producing real journalists they've foisted on the public bringing us the same crooked politicians back again and again who get caught with their hands raking out the dough to themselves from the US Treasury with a silent press ignoring the entire thing.​

It only takes one person's words to change how the world looks at itself, and yours have that potential.​

Kudos.​