- Thread starter
- #21
I note that you've avoided commenting on whether it was a poor idea or not.
Trump’s keeping it.
What does that tell you?
I note that you've avoided commenting on whether it was a poor idea or not..
You going out in daylight; poor idea.
Iran deal? I honestly could not tell you. This is why having experts advise the President is a good idea. Kushner and Ivana? Now those are poor ideas.
Well....Obama and Kerry certainly aren't experts.
But I am.
The sanctions were bringing Iran to its knees....but that wasn't the plan. The plan was to injure America and Israel and make certain that the worst players got nuclear weapons.
The sanctions were strangling them.
This from the Left-leaning Brookings Institute...
"....the sanctions against Iran — and the context for them internationally and within Iran — have changed dramatically. Since 2010, the sanctions’ impact on Iran has been severe: its oil exports and revenues plummeted; the value of its currency eroded; trade disruptions shuttered businesses and exacerbated inflation. Quietly, a backlash emerged among Iran’s political elites against the country’s creeping isolation, and the June 2013 presidential election ushered in a moderate new president and the beginnings of a diplomatic breakthrough on the nuclear crisis — achievements that most observers attribute to the impact of sanctions."
Why “Iran Style” Sanctions Worked Against Tehran (And Why They Might Not Succeed with Moscow) | Brookings Institution
What have we prove?
a. That Barack Obama is an anti-American, crypto-Islamist snake.
b. That you are a fool who marches lock-step in whatever way your masters tell you to.
didn’t read, don’t care. Obama had credentialed advisors; Trump has relatives…
"didn’t read, don’t care."
Exactly.
Did I mention what anti-intellectuals Liberals are?
I mean....before you proved it.