Top dems suggest sacrificing seats to stop nomination

[Rustic]

It's 51 to 49, guys.

McCain won't vote, so it's 50 to 49, and you will need Pence.

If either Murkowski or Collins says "nope", it's over.

But I think the thread is talking about picking up some Democrats like Manchin. From the OP's link, Sen Durbin is saying no Dems, not even red state Dems, should vote for the nominee.

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., acknowledged that so-called red-state Democrats may be tempted to vote for Trump's selection out of political necessity, but urged his colleagues Sunday to consider more than their political careers.​

That seems to be the idea

Go for it and let the chips fall where they may

Trump will get his nomination, all of his nominees have been vetted

Like Mike Flynn?

His list of judges

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Voters will not care.

If so, they would have defeated Trump.

The dems "no" votes will not be in jeopardy in red states.

Nobody cares about the Supreme Court

Sound like "Trump has no path to the White House "

It's Hillary by a landslide 140 million to nothing

 

[Polishprince]

The President should nominate Mike Lee. If the libs defeat him, he can take revenge in the Senate chambers against them.

Super glue on the toilet seats in the Democrat rest room, piss in the Democrats coffee pot in their lunch room, gum on their chairs.

What ever it takes.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Voters will not care.

If so, they would have defeated Trump.

The dems "no" votes will not be in jeopardy in red states.

Oh yes they will, especially north dakota and west virginia.

 

[rightwinger]

Voters will not care.

If so, they would have defeated Trump.

The dems "no" votes will not be in jeopardy in red states.

Oh yes they will, especially north dakota and west virginia.

That’s what Dems thought in 2016

Not a big issue with voters

 

[JakeStarkey]

Voters will not care.

If so, they would have defeated Trump.

The dems "no" votes will not be in jeopardy in red states.

Oh yes they will, especially north dakota and west virginia.

Not in the slightest.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Voters will not care.

If so, they would have defeated Trump.

The dems "no" votes will not be in jeopardy in red states.

Oh yes they will, especially north dakota and west virginia.

That’s what Dems thought in 2016

Not a big issue with voters

Heidi and manchin weren't up for election in 2016.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Voters will not care.

If so, they would have defeated Trump.

The dems "no" votes will not be in jeopardy in red states.

Oh yes they will, especially north dakota and west virginia.

Not in the slightest.

I just take the opposite of your predictions, JS and I come out a winner!! Thanks JS.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You have been losing then for the last year, LBT.

The Alt Right russian fluffers are the lepers of American politics.

You will need both Collins and Murkowski to get the ratification.

 

[Kondor3]

...Nobody cares about the Supreme Court

Except Democrats on-the-outside-looking-in, trying to pretend like they don't care...

 

[JakeStarkey]

That's you pretending to care, Kondor3.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

You have been losing then for the last year, LBT.

The Alt Right russian fluffers are the lepers of American politics.

You will need both Collins and Murkowski to get the ratification.

They voted for gorsuch. They'll do the same for the next solid nom.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You hope.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Voters will not care.

If so, they would have defeated Trump.

The dems "no" votes will not be in jeopardy in red states.

Nobody cares about the Supreme Court

Actually dumb ass a poll was done and a shit load of people said the Supreme Court was a major decider for who they voted for.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Voters will not care.

If so, they would have defeated Trump.

The dems "no" votes will not be in jeopardy in red states.

Nobody cares about the Supreme Court

Actually dumb ass a poll was done and a shit load of people said the Supreme Court was a major decider for who they voted for.

A small minority, you think?

 

[Intolerant]

It doesn't surprise me that D's would sacrifice their political careers in order to stop Trump from ending their agenda they've spent decades building. I hope they utterly self destruct providing yet another Trump win!

 

[OKTexas]

It's 51 to 49, guys.

McCain won't vote, so it's 50 to 49, and you will need Pence.

If either Murkowski or Collins says "nope", it's over.

Hey dumb ass, the only way you get a tie is by someone abstaining.


.

 

[dcbl]

Voters will not care.

If so, they would have defeated Trump.

The dems "no" votes will not be in jeopardy in red states.

Nobody cares about the Supreme Court

Actually dumb ass a poll was done and a shit load of people said the Supreme Court was a major decider for who they voted for.

SCOTUS was why so many that weren't really happy with Trump voted for him

and he delivered Big League with Gorsuch

this next appointee is YUGE, and if we get to replace RBG, watch out - that was what all of this was about for me

 

[Preacher]

On eve of Trump's Supreme Court pick, top Dem suggests sacrificing Senate seats to stop nomination

This has me scratching my head. You CAN'T stop the nomination since GOP has majority even if the 2 cucks Murkowski and Collins vote no we just need VP Pence to vote yes and its done deal....so you are gonna give up seats easier by voting no? Makes no sense but that is the mind of a liberal so.

Not too good at math are ya, the VP only votes to break ties. That's hard to get with 99 voting.


.

Nope I suck at math LOL....thanks for pointing that out I forgot McCain was at home and won't be voting.

Voters will not care.

If so, they would have defeated Trump.

The dems "no" votes will not be in jeopardy in red states.

Nobody cares about the Supreme Court

Actually that's why a LOT of people including people here voted for Trump. The SC and only the SC...I didn't I voted for him because I liked his policies and his upending the apple cart way of doing things.

 

[TomParks]

This man would made a good Justice and send liberals over the edge...