Tornado activity at "Historic lows"!!!

[skookerasbil]

Top story on DRUDGE right now.......more losing for the Stoopids!!

A mere one tornado has struck the U.S. in November as yearly totals near historic lows

So......why does this whole "climate science" concept have close to zero credibility anymore?

Shit like this..........the AGW cult promised, years ago, that tornado activity would be off the charts due to "climate change".

Wrong again s0ns!!

 

[HaShev]

Once, Al Gore was heading to a climate conferance in Colorado in the summer and it snowed. Talk about making that subject seem like a liar.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Tornado activity at "Historic lows"!!! -- Global Warming to blame! (Added by the AGWCult)

 

[Moonglow]

Top story on DRUDGE right now.......more losing for the Stoopids!!

A mere one tornado has struck the U.S. in November as yearly totals near historic lows

So......why does this whole "climate science" concept have close to zero credibility anymore?

Shit like this..........the AGW cult promised, years ago, that tornado activity would be off the charts due to "climate change".

Wrong again s0ns!!

Probably because of the drought, duh....

 

[skookerasbil]

Top story on DRUDGE right now.......more losing for the Stoopids!!

A mere one tornado has struck the U.S. in November as yearly totals near historic lows

So......why does this whole "climate science" concept have close to zero credibility anymore?

Shit like this..........the AGW cult promised, years ago, that tornado activity would be off the charts due to "climate change".

Wrong again s0ns!!

Probably because of the drought, duh....

Oooooops...........but no link between drought and climate change. That's another tall tale from the k00ks which is easily debunked by historical graphs on drought.

Would you like me to post up US drought graphs going back to the 1800's s0n?

Let me know........this poking progressive nutters in the eye these last few weeks has been a hoot...........

 

[Moonglow]

Top story on DRUDGE right now.......more losing for the Stoopids!!

A mere one tornado has struck the U.S. in November as yearly totals near historic lows

So......why does this whole "climate science" concept have close to zero credibility anymore?

Shit like this..........the AGW cult promised, years ago, that tornado activity would be off the charts due to "climate change".

Wrong again s0ns!!

Probably because of the drought, duh....

Oooooops...........but no link between drought and climate change. That's another tall tale from the k00ks which is easily debunked by historical graphs on drought.

Would you like me to post up US drought graphs going back to the 1800's s0n?

Let me know........this poking progressive nutters in the eye these last few weeks has been a hoot...........

You can put pressure graphs on yer penis to show it's age, but if there is no variable, there will be no foul weather..

 

[skookerasbil]

Top story on DRUDGE right now.......more losing for the Stoopids!!

A mere one tornado has struck the U.S. in November as yearly totals near historic lows

So......why does this whole "climate science" concept have close to zero credibility anymore?

Shit like this..........the AGW cult promised, years ago, that tornado activity would be off the charts due to "climate change".

Wrong again s0ns!!

Probably because of the drought, duh....

Oooooops...........but no link between drought and climate change. That's another tall tale from the k00ks which is easily debunked by historical graphs on drought.

Would you like me to post up US drought graphs going back to the 1800's s0n?

Let me know........this poking progressive nutters in the eye these last few weeks has been a hoot...........

You can put pressure graphs on yer penis to show it's age, but if there is no variable, there will be no foul weather..

The misery screams s0n!! No need to post the historic US drought map.........

Dang s0n.......really feeling the bumpy cucumber these days huh??!! Sucks for you........... Don't be such a God damned snowflake.


Actually thinking of stealing your avatar s0n......fits way better for me these days!

 

[skookerasbil]

Hey Moonglow..........heres a new avatar for ya s0n!!!

[URL='http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/ExplodingHead.gif.html'][/URL]

 

[Moonglow]

Top story on DRUDGE right now.......more losing for the Stoopids!!

A mere one tornado has struck the U.S. in November as yearly totals near historic lows

So......why does this whole "climate science" concept have close to zero credibility anymore?

Shit like this..........the AGW cult promised, years ago, that tornado activity would be off the charts due to "climate change".

Wrong again s0ns!!

Probably because of the drought, duh....

Oooooops...........but no link between drought and climate change. That's another tall tale from the k00ks which is easily debunked by historical graphs on drought.

Would you like me to post up US drought graphs going back to the 1800's s0n?

Let me know........this poking progressive nutters in the eye these last few weeks has been a hoot...........

You can put pressure graphs on yer penis to show it's age, but if there is no variable, there will be no foul weather..

The misery screams s0n!! No need to post the historic US drought map.........

Dang s0n.......really feeling the bumpy cucumber these days huh??!! Sucks for you........... Don't be such a God damned snowflake.


Actually thinking of stealing your avatar s0n......fits way better for me these days!

If you have never lived in tornado alley, you have no idea how we don't care if tornadoes stay at home this year..

 

[ding]

Top story on DRUDGE right now.......more losing for the Stoopids!!

A mere one tornado has struck the U.S. in November as yearly totals near historic lows

So......why does this whole "climate science" concept have close to zero credibility anymore?

Shit like this..........the AGW cult promised, years ago, that tornado activity would be off the charts due to "climate change".

Wrong again s0ns!!

Probably because of the drought, duh....

It is called weather, Moonglow. Don't shit your pants over it.

And as Nature magazine explained in 2012, “climate attribution” — the attempt to link singular weather events to manmade global warming — “rests on a comparison of the probability of an observed weather event in the real world with that of the ‘same’ event in a hypothetical world without global warming.” As critics have observed, such attribution claims “are unjustifiably speculative, basically unverifiable and better not made at all.”

 

[idb]

Top story on DRUDGE right now.......more losing for the Stoopids!!

A mere one tornado has struck the U.S. in November as yearly totals near historic lows

So......why does this whole "climate science" concept have close to zero credibility anymore?

Shit like this..........the AGW cult promised, years ago, that tornado activity would be off the charts due to "climate change".

Wrong again s0ns!!

Historic lows!?
Are you saying that the climate's changing?

 

[skookerasbil]

I remember about 5 years ago, every one of the global warming alarmists were promising that tornado's were going to be taking over the planet! Of course due to climate change.........

Time after time, these bozo's get it wrong!! But they call skeptics, morons!

On hurricanes?

stoopid

On snow?

stoopid

On tornados?

stoopid

On sea ice?

beyond stoopid


On drought?

most stoopid of all

 

[Moonglow]

Top story on DRUDGE right now.......more losing for the Stoopids!!

A mere one tornado has struck the U.S. in November as yearly totals near historic lows

So......why does this whole "climate science" concept have close to zero credibility anymore?

Shit like this..........the AGW cult promised, years ago, that tornado activity would be off the charts due to "climate change".

Wrong again s0ns!!

Probably because of the drought, duh....

It is called weather, Moonglow. Don't shit your pants over it.

And as Nature magazine explained in 2012, “climate attribution” — the attempt to link singular weather events to manmade global warming — “rests on a comparison of the probability of an observed weather event in the real world with that of the ‘same’ event in a hypothetical world without global warming.” As critics have observed, such attribution claims “are unjustifiably speculative, basically unverifiable and better not made at all.”

Actually , since weather is a radical there is no known equation that will do...But when you have an area of drought there tends to be fewer severe storms....No matter what the scientist say. Or you...Or the climate fellows that waste their time...

 

[Old Rocks]

400, 000,000 trees lost in just two states due to drought and the fires that the drought created the conditions for, Texas and California.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/us/california-today-dead-trees-forests.html?_r=0

California’s trees are dying at an alarming rate.

Late last week, the U.S. Forest Service said an aerial survey revealed that 36 million additional trees had died while in the grip of persistent drought, bringing the total since 2010 to more than 102 million.

Those numbers have startled California officials and scientists while adding urgency to a long-simmering debate over what should be done about it.

The tree deaths have been concentrated in the southern and central Sierra Nevada, but experts warn of increasing deaths in forests all the way up to the Oregon border.

The Final Numbers Are In: Over 300 Million Trees Killed By the Texas Drought

The tally of the Texas drought‘s toll continues. After an extensive survey, the Texas A&M Forest Service today puts the number of rural trees killed by the Texas drought at 301 million. That falls right in the middle of a December 2011 estimate by the service that between 100 and 500 million trees had been killed by the drought.

The survey only applies to trees in rural forest areas. The number of trees in urban settings that were lost to the drought was pegged at over five million earlier this year.

 

[Old Rocks]

Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag

Sea ice is the lowest it has ever been for this date in both the Arctic and the Antarctic. Not just low, but low by -3 standard deviations. And the North pole last week saw days of above freezing weather. In the polar night.

 

[ding]

Top story on DRUDGE right now.......more losing for the Stoopids!!

A mere one tornado has struck the U.S. in November as yearly totals near historic lows

So......why does this whole "climate science" concept have close to zero credibility anymore?

Shit like this..........the AGW cult promised, years ago, that tornado activity would be off the charts due to "climate change".

Wrong again s0ns!!

Probably because of the drought, duh....

It is called weather, Moonglow. Don't shit your pants over it.

And as Nature magazine explained in 2012, “climate attribution” — the attempt to link singular weather events to manmade global warming — “rests on a comparison of the probability of an observed weather event in the real world with that of the ‘same’ event in a hypothetical world without global warming.” As critics have observed, such attribution claims “are unjustifiably speculative, basically unverifiable and better not made at all.”

Actually , since weather is a radical there is no known equation that will do...But when you have an area of drought there tends to be fewer severe storms....No matter what the scientist say. Or you...Or the climate fellows that waste their time...

Right, which goes back to the cause of the drought.

 

[Old Rocks]

Global Warming and Hurricanes Figures – Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

Still looks as if hurricanes are not getting any better in the Atlantic. In the Pacific, we have been getting some record storms.

 

[Old Rocks]

Top story on DRUDGE right now.......more losing for the Stoopids!!

A mere one tornado has struck the U.S. in November as yearly totals near historic lows

So......why does this whole "climate science" concept have close to zero credibility anymore?

Shit like this..........the AGW cult promised, years ago, that tornado activity would be off the charts due to "climate change".

Wrong again s0ns!!

Probably because of the drought, duh....

It is called weather, Moonglow. Don't shit your pants over it.

And as Nature magazine explained in 2012, “climate attribution” — the attempt to link singular weather events to manmade global warming — “rests on a comparison of the probability of an observed weather event in the real world with that of the ‘same’ event in a hypothetical world without global warming.” As critics have observed, such attribution claims “are unjustifiably speculative, basically unverifiable and better not made at all.”

Actually , since weather is a radical there is no known equation that will do...But when you have an area of drought there tends to be fewer severe storms....No matter what the scientist say. Or you...Or the climate fellows that waste their time...

Right, which goes back to the cause of the drought.

Hansen et al. 1981
Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.

Pubs.GISS: Hansen et al. 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide

Dr. James Hansen made that prediction in 1981. And it has been spot on, except that he was expecting to Northwest Passage to open up in the latter half of this century. It opened the first time in 2007. And this year, a luxury liner did the passage.

 

[ding]

Top story on DRUDGE right now.......more losing for the Stoopids!!

A mere one tornado has struck the U.S. in November as yearly totals near historic lows

So......why does this whole "climate science" concept have close to zero credibility anymore?

Shit like this..........the AGW cult promised, years ago, that tornado activity would be off the charts due to "climate change".

Wrong again s0ns!!

Probably because of the drought, duh....

It is called weather, Moonglow. Don't shit your pants over it.

And as Nature magazine explained in 2012, “climate attribution” — the attempt to link singular weather events to manmade global warming — “rests on a comparison of the probability of an observed weather event in the real world with that of the ‘same’ event in a hypothetical world without global warming.” As critics have observed, such attribution claims “are unjustifiably speculative, basically unverifiable and better not made at all.”

Actually , since weather is a radical there is no known equation that will do...But when you have an area of drought there tends to be fewer severe storms....No matter what the scientist say. Or you...Or the climate fellows that waste their time...

Right, which goes back to the cause of the drought.

Hansen et al. 1981
Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.

Pubs.GISS: Hansen et al. 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide

Dr. James Hansen made that prediction in 1981. And it has been spot on, except that he was expecting to Northwest Passage to open up in the latter half of this century. It opened the first time in 2007. And this year, a luxury liner did the passage.

And as Nature magazine explained in 2012, “climate attribution” — the attempt to link singular weather events to manmade global warming — “rests on a comparison of the probability of an observed weather event in the real world with that of the ‘same’ event in a hypothetical world without global warming.” As critics have observed, such attribution claims “are unjustifiably speculative, basically unverifiable and better not made at all.”

 

[Old Rocks]

Probably because of the drought, duh....

It is called weather, Moonglow. Don't shit your pants over it.

And as Nature magazine explained in 2012, “climate attribution” — the attempt to link singular weather events to manmade global warming — “rests on a comparison of the probability of an observed weather event in the real world with that of the ‘same’ event in a hypothetical world without global warming.” As critics have observed, such attribution claims “are unjustifiably speculative, basically unverifiable and better not made at all.”

Actually , since weather is a radical there is no known equation that will do...But when you have an area of drought there tends to be fewer severe storms....No matter what the scientist say. Or you...Or the climate fellows that waste their time...

Right, which goes back to the cause of the drought.

Hansen et al. 1981
Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.

Pubs.GISS: Hansen et al. 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide

Dr. James Hansen made that prediction in 1981. And it has been spot on, except that he was expecting to Northwest Passage to open up in the latter half of this century. It opened the first time in 2007. And this year, a luxury liner did the passage.

And as Nature magazine explained in 2012, “climate attribution” — the attempt to link singular weather events to manmade global warming — “rests on a comparison of the probability of an observed weather event in the real world with that of the ‘same’ event in a hypothetical world without global warming.” As critics have observed, such attribution claims “are unjustifiably speculative, basically unverifiable and better not made at all.”

But that is the problem. The droughts are plural, not a singular event. Again, doesn't fit your political agenda, so you are going to ignore the facts..