Tranny Defends Exposing Penis In Women's Locker Room: Free Speech/Protests "Locked Down".

[Geaux4it]

There's a new hand over your mouth ladies..and his name is Always-Autumn

(*mine) Trans Woman Declares She’s No Longer ‘Ashamed’ to Expose Penis in Women’s Locker Room
"While countless girls walk around the locker room naked, I felt like I couldn't... because I have a penis."...*he found it difficult to expose *himself in female company. At least until this weekend, when *he "finally said 'fuck it,'" and, to the "disapproving looks" of ** women, undressed in the middle of the locker room, *his male genitalia exposed, and "walked naked to the shower."

..."I live in Manhattan and work out at a gym in Soho, so I figured that this is as safe a place as any to push the envelope."..

..Some critics even tried to steer the conversation into taking into account the feelings of women traumatized by male abuse. How would a woman who suffered through sexual harassment feel upon seeing Always-Autumn naked in a locker room? How would a female rape victim feel?

But this criticism, like all others, has been shut down."...
Eventually, the subreddit's moderators deleted all responses critical of Always-Autumn, given the group's guidelines that prohibit " stirring the post." The thread has later been locked altogether.


The article refers to the man as "she" and "her" which is terrible journalism. Some people 'even' tried to take into account the feelings of women rape victims? Really? Wow, what an edgy concept. You've come a long way baby..

Imagine a site for debate locking down a thread where women are complaining that they must undress in front of a man and enduring him naked in the WOMEN'S locker room? What website nazis would do such a thing to drown the cries of distressed women? They could've covertly squelched the cries of protest by just dungeoning the conversation; ie: soft-banning any protests of women rape victims and their defenders.

This fails as a hasty generalization fallacy.

Of course, bigotry and hate are devoid of logic and critical thinking, this thread being a prime example.

Clayton you're such a tool....

-Geaux

 

[Polishprince]

The Transexual Revolution is why President Trump's adversaries no longer wear pink hats.

The new realization of the past couple of years is that all women don't have female equipment, many have penises.

Then they are male.

-Geaux

Biologically, of course you are correct.

But socially and legally, a man in a dress is now considered to be a broad by the powers that be.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Clayton you're such a tool....

I must take issue with that statement. By definition, a tool is useful; you can do productive work with a tool.

No similar thing can honesty be said of C_Clayton_Jones.

 

[danielpalos]

where are the brave women in modern times who don't mind, "keeping a dick surrounded to keep it contained"?

 

[Geaux4it]

That thing that exposed itself deserves retribution like men deliver other men when required.

-Geaux

 

[danielpalos]

That thing that exposed itself deserves retribution like men deliver other men when required.

-Geaux

did you read the OP? it is not that simple. What would, StarShip Troopers, say.

 

[Papageorgio]

I would not visit, support or join an organization that allowed men into women's locker rooms.Women need to be respect and protected from the mentally unstable people of this country.

`
How paternalistic of you. Now please protect us from the inhuman tump supporters.

I didn't vote for nor will I vote for Trump, put on your big boy pants and protect yourself, idiot.

 

[Papageorgio]

Again, he won 30 states to 20.

Awesome... which doesn't reflect what the people wanted at all.

OK, at the risk of derailing the thread, let me explain something to you about how elections work and the wisdom of our Founding Fathers and why the system was set up the way it is. Most people live concentrated in a few states, mainly along coastlines. The FFs realized that if just the popular vote were taken into account, the other states would always suffer their unique interests slaughtered at the will of the more populated ones. Get that concept? From there, if the popular vote reigned supreme, the "Flyover" states and those who wanted a unique culture they themselves defined would be diluted to the point of just being a territory of the dominating coastal states. Sovereign states didn't/don't want the power of their own self-governance taken away. If the popular vote reigns supreme, the US would simply just be one giant territory without any unique individual states eventually....the power of the "Flyover states" so diluted as to not even make them matter anymore as unique societies to themselves.

Now, that may appeal to you since you may be one of the fascists who want a one-world thought process. But diversity is a nation's strength, yes? You'd argue that on another platform. But when it comes to diversity of THOUGHT and OPINION and individuals determining their own unique destiny, THAT is where you would draw the line and cry "but we won the popular vote!!!".

The FFs were smart. They realized how when herds get big they sometimes stampede if not checked by a few old-school cutting dogs. This is why ALL 50 states have EQUAL power in the Senate. And it's why the electoral college exists; even it is a compromise to the "population density" issue. So, take your gains and shut your mouth about taking away what little power still rests with states who have thinner populations.

Why waste time explaining anything to Joe, he is a clueless moron that believes whatever he is fed by his leaders, he has no thought process.

 

[Papageorgio]

That thing that exposed itself deserves retribution like men deliver other men when required.

-Geaux

did you read the OP? it is not that simple. What would, StarShip Troopers, say.

He is right on target, you don't get the LAW and that is why you flounder with no progress.

 

[danielpalos]

That thing that exposed itself deserves retribution like men deliver other men when required.

-Geaux

did you read the OP? it is not that simple. What would, StarShip Troopers, say.

He is right on target, you don't get the LAW and that is why you flounder with no progress.

you didn't read the op.

 

[danielpalos]

i can't believe modern women are afraid of One penis; usually, it takes a whole gang of them.

 

[Papageorgio]

That thing that exposed itself deserves retribution like men deliver other men when required.

-Geaux

did you read the OP? it is not that simple. What would, StarShip Troopers, say.

He is right on target, you don't get the LAW and that is why you flounder with no progress.

you didn't read the op.

You don't follow the LAW.

 

[danielpalos]

That thing that exposed itself deserves retribution like men deliver other men when required.

-Geaux

did you read the OP? it is not that simple. What would, StarShip Troopers, say.

He is right on target, you don't get the LAW and that is why you flounder with no progress.

you didn't read the op.

You don't follow the LAW.

the common law. why are women afraid of one dick? why are women not more about Equality and merely asking their bravest, to "keep dick surrounded" for the rest of us.

 

[Papageorgio]

That thing that exposed itself deserves retribution like men deliver other men when required.

-Geaux

did you read the OP? it is not that simple. What would, StarShip Troopers, say.

He is right on target, you don't get the LAW and that is why you flounder with no progress.

you didn't read the op.

You don't follow the LAW.

the common law. why are women afraid of one dick? why are women not more about Equality and merely asking their bravest, to "keep dick surrounded" for the rest of us.

It is obvious you are clueless and causeless without the LAW.

 

[danielpalos]

did you read the OP? it is not that simple. What would, StarShip Troopers, say.

He is right on target, you don't get the LAW and that is why you flounder with no progress.

you didn't read the op.

You don't follow the LAW.

the common law. why are women afraid of one dick? why are women not more about Equality and merely asking their bravest, to "keep dick surrounded" for the rest of us.

It is obvious you are clueless and causeless without the LAW.

the common law?

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

 

[Papageorgio]

He is right on target, you don't get the LAW and that is why you flounder with no progress.

you didn't read the op.

You don't follow the LAW.

the common law. why are women afraid of one dick? why are women not more about Equality and merely asking their bravest, to "keep dick surrounded" for the rest of us.

It is obvious you are clueless and causeless without the LAW.

the common law?

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

You do not know what you do not know, it seems you are clueless and causeless when it comes to understanding the LAW which will naturally be called into force whether you know or not know.

 

[Silhouette]

the common law?

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

Is that the argument you and your ilk will present to the USSC when this issue makes its way there inevitably? This will be like shooting fish in a barrel for the attorneys for women.

 

[danielpalos]

you didn't read the op.

You don't follow the LAW.

the common law. why are women afraid of one dick? why are women not more about Equality and merely asking their bravest, to "keep dick surrounded" for the rest of us.

It is obvious you are clueless and causeless without the LAW.

the common law?

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

You do not know what you do not know, it seems you are clueless and causeless when it comes to understanding the LAW which will naturally be called into force whether you know or not know.

the common law?

there is no appeal to ignorance.

you have to make a superior, but common case for the common law to adjudicate.

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

where are the brave women in modern times?

 

[Papageorgio]

You don't follow the LAW.

the common law. why are women afraid of one dick? why are women not more about Equality and merely asking their bravest, to "keep dick surrounded" for the rest of us.

It is obvious you are clueless and causeless without the LAW.

the common law?

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

You do not know what you do not know, it seems you are clueless and causeless when it comes to understanding the LAW which will naturally be called into force whether you know or not know.

the common law?

there is no appeal to ignorance.

you have to make a superior, but common case for the common law to adjudicate.

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

where are the brave women in modern times?

Please up grade to the LAW and not the clueless causeless common law of which you tripe.

 

[danielpalos]

the common law. why are women afraid of one dick? why are women not more about Equality and merely asking their bravest, to "keep dick surrounded" for the rest of us.

It is obvious you are clueless and causeless without the LAW.

the common law?

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

You do not know what you do not know, it seems you are clueless and causeless when it comes to understanding the LAW which will naturally be called into force whether you know or not know.

the common law?

there is no appeal to ignorance.

you have to make a superior, but common case for the common law to adjudicate.

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

where are the brave women in modern times?

Please up grade to the LAW and not the clueless causeless common law of which you tripe.

that won't work in open Court. you need an argument.