Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,439
The bonuses were just part of it. Some companies increased their minimum starting wage which is good for lower income earners.
Yea some companies looking for PR opportunity, while not actually doing much of anything different.
Early in 2017 Wells Fargo said it was raisingits minimum wage to a range of $13.50 to $17. And there's a good reason some of the bank's lowest paid are already making $15 or more. Amalgamated Bank isn't the only one in the banking industry already ahead of Wells Fargo on wages. J.P. Morgan said more than a year ago that 90 percent of the employees affected by a new minimum wage policy would see an increase to between $13.50 and $16.50.
The tortured truth behind Wells Fargo's minimum wage raise
It's a help. Fifth Third for instance will increase wages for 75% of it's employees.
It is MISAPPROPRIATED, FINANCED BY DEFICIT HELP
Fifth Third will spend about $23.6 million on the raises and bonuses during the first year, a company spokeswoman said. The bonuses will be a one-time cost of $13.6 million and the raises will cost Fifth Third about another $10 million in 2018.
https://www.bizjournals.com/cincinn...th-third-gives-pay-raises-to-most-of-its.html
So $23 million? Out of ~200 million they will forgo in taxes? 10% That's it?
Fifth Third Bancorp Financials
What we could have done is take that 200 million and DIRECTLY give not 10%, or 20% or 30% to middle class, but 90% of it with something like payroll tax cut, which by the way would would also lower the cost of American employment to businesses.
Didn't have to be payroll tax-cut either - there was 101 ways to blow 1.7 Trillion bucks that would be much better for middle class than this ridiculous giveaway to wall street tycoons and corporations.
Bottom line is that it's having a positive impact even on the little guy. What did DumBama do for the little guy? His 50 employee maximum before they get tortured with Commie Care created a huge increase in part-time workers. Record low labor participation rate was indicative that our social programs got out of control.
And now that the little guy is going to be relieved of the Commie Care tax, that's another benefit to our economy.
That’s not the bottom line, that’s you ignoring everything I just said about the deficit COST and only small fraction of the cost going to the employees.
Just because there is some upside to policy DOES NOT MEAN IT IS A GOOD POLICY.
We can stop collecting taxes tommorow and will land tons of money in everyone’s pockets...and oh by the way, bankrupt our country.
It's "estimated" that it will cost 1.5 trillion over ten years. That figure does not include what would happen if the economy really gets hot because of course, that would mean much more in tax revenue.
I predict it won't cost anything. I think it will increase our labor participation rate, increase pay, and of course, make the USA more attractive for businesses to come or stay here.
You can ignore all that if you desire, but even you have to admit if Trump's efforts brought us a cure for cancer, the left will find something negative about it.