TRUMP EFFECT: Apple Looking To Bring $252 B In Foreign Cash Back To USA After Landmark Tax Bill

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Apr 1, 2011
170,163
47,312
It's already happening, folks. All the corporate profits parked overseas because of the high American corporate tax rate are returning to the country. It's estimaged there are $2.5 trillion of this money. If it all returns, it will mean a huge injection of cash into the American economy. The snowflakes know this. That's why they are whining so much about the tax cut.

TRUMP EFFECT: Apple Looking To Bring $252 Billion In Foreign Cash Back To USA After Landmark Tax Bill

Since the Senate approved Trump’s tax bill 51-48 in a midnight showdown, we have already seen major economic wins in this country:

Well, here’s another one.

For all the scowling that Apple’s Tim Cook did during those Tech council meetings, he might not be able to feign outrage over the Republican president any longer. It has now become affordable for Apple to fulfill a longtime goal and repatriate $252B in cash that currently sits overseas. Via 9to5Mac:

Apple would be able to take advantage of a one-time tax break, paying just 15.5% tax on the cash, rather than the 35% it would have had to pay previously.

If Apple chose to bring all of the cash back to the US, it would pay $39.1B in tax. And this would be practical because the company has already set aside $36.3B – almost the entire amount – for exactly that eventuality. But there’s one catch …

Reuters notes that Apple could be caught out by one provision in the bill. The bill introduces a minimum tax of around 13% on income from patents held overseas, and this could put an end to one method Apple has used to reduce its tax bill.

The treatment of foreign patent profits is important to Apple because shifting those profits overseas was a cornerstone of its tax practices for decades.

In effect, the company attributes a large portion of the value of its products to patents and other intellectual property such as trademarks. Apple then assigns some of that IP, proportional to overseas sales, to subsidiaries in countries with low tax rates and assesses substantial patent royalties on sales. Those royalties then flow back to those low-tax locations, like Ireland.
 
That's just Apple. How many companies have funds parked overseas because of our killer tax rates that would bring it back.
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
 
President Trump has reversed the flow of money from OUT to IN. It really is as simple as that. And it is going to be...........................................................
YYYYYYYYUUUUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!
:beer::banana::biggrin::boobies::banana::2up::2up:
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Really? Then why didn't it come back during what you claim to be the obie great economic years? I mean seriously if you're going to roll the dice on several billion dollars and you pull the trigger during the Trump administration but held the money back for eight years of obie...How can you claim they always meant to bring it back?
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Really? Then why didn't it come back during what you claim to be the obie great economic years? I mean seriously if you're going to roll the dice on several billion dollars and you pull the trigger during the Trump administration but held the money back for eight years of obie...How can you claim they always meant to bring it back?

They meant to bring it back when the US cut the rate on corporate taxes, and not one minute sooner.
 
It's already happening, folks. All the corporate profits parked overseas because of the high American corporate tax rate are returning to the country. It's estimaged there are $2.5 trillion of this money. If it all returns, it will mean a huge injection of cash into the American economy. The snowflakes know this. That's why they are whining so much about the tax cut.

TRUMP EFFECT: Apple Looking To Bring $252 Billion In Foreign Cash Back To USA After Landmark Tax Bill

Since the Senate approved Trump’s tax bill 51-48 in a midnight showdown, we have already seen major economic wins in this country:

Well, here’s another one.

For all the scowling that Apple’s Tim Cook did during those Tech council meetings, he might not be able to feign outrage over the Republican president any longer. It has now become affordable for Apple to fulfill a longtime goal and repatriate $252B in cash that currently sits overseas. Via 9to5Mac:

Apple would be able to take advantage of a one-time tax break, paying just 15.5% tax on the cash, rather than the 35% it would have had to pay previously.

If Apple chose to bring all of the cash back to the US, it would pay $39.1B in tax. And this would be practical because the company has already set aside $36.3B – almost the entire amount – for exactly that eventuality. But there’s one catch …

Reuters notes that Apple could be caught out by one provision in the bill. The bill introduces a minimum tax of around 13% on income from patents held overseas, and this could put an end to one method Apple has used to reduce its tax bill.

The treatment of foreign patent profits is important to Apple because shifting those profits overseas was a cornerstone of its tax practices for decades.

In effect, the company attributes a large portion of the value of its products to patents and other intellectual property such as trademarks. Apple then assigns some of that IP, proportional to overseas sales, to subsidiaries in countries with low tax rates and assesses substantial patent royalties on sales. Those royalties then flow back to those low-tax locations, like Ireland.
Just look at how Trump is harming the economy of other nations!
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Thank you!

Tim Cook announced in September 2016 that Apple planned to repatriate some measure of its $200B+ held overseas. The man wasn't even a Trump supporter and at the time; in fact, he supported Clinton. Moreover, in September 2016, "everyone" thought Clinton would win the election, including Cook. Clinton, AFAIK, never promised any great repatriation reprieves or discounts or whatever; thus there's no rational basis for asserting any Apple cash repatriation is attributable to anything having to do with Trump. Furthermore, unless and until Apple does repatriate the money, something it is not required to do and that it can at the "drop of a hat" opt not to do, it's premature for unrelated third parties to even remark about the prospect of their doing so, much less count on it happening.
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Really? Then why didn't it come back during what you claim to be the obie great economic years? I mean seriously if you're going to roll the dice on several billion dollars and you pull the trigger during the Trump administration but held the money back for eight years of obie...How can you claim they always meant to bring it back?

They meant to bring it back when the US cut the rate on corporate taxes, and not one minute sooner.
Holy shit. You mean they actually made decisions based on economics and not emotional crap the left tries to sell? Black president, higher taxes, more regulations, more SJW shit and racial dividing wasn't the key to getting investment. Who'd a thunk it.
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Thank you!

Tim Cook announced in September 2016 that Apple planned to repatriate some measure of its $200B+ held overseas. The man wasn't even a Trump supporter and at the time; in fact, he supported Clinton. Moreover, in September 2016, "everyone" thought Clinton would win the election, including Cook. Clinton, AFAIK, never promised any great repatriation reprieves or discounts or whatever; thus there's no rational basis for asserting any Apple cash repatriation is attributable to anything having to do with Trump. Furthermore, unless and until Apple does repatriate the money, something it is not required to do and that it can at the "drop of a hat" opt not to do, it's premature for unrelated third parties to even remark about the prospect of their doing so, much less count on it happening.
Let's see. Under Obama or Hillary, Apple would have paid $88 billion in taxes on that money. Under the new tax law it will pay $37.8 billion. The difference is $50 billion dollars. I think the new tax rates are a pretty good reason to repatriate the money
 
Last edited:
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Thank you!

Tim Cook announced in September 2016 that Apple planned to repatriate some measure of its $200B+ held overseas. The man wasn't even a Trump supporter and at the time; in fact, he supported Clinton. Moreover, in September 2016, "everyone" thought Clinton would win the election, including Cook. Clinton, AFAIK, never promised any great repatriation reprieves or discounts or whatever; thus there's no rational basis for asserting any Apple cash repatriation is attributable to anything having to do with Trump. Furthermore, unless and until Apple does repatriate the money, something it is not required to do and that it can at the "drop of a hat" opt not to do, it's premature for unrelated third parties to even remark about the prospect of their doing so, much less count on it happening.
What does "some measure" mean? How much is that exactly? Some measure of 200 billion meaning 20 bucks? Or closer to the 200 billion? They sure as hell never even considered any "some measure" during the obie years.
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Thank you!

Tim Cook announced in September 2016 that Apple planned to repatriate some measure of its $200B+ held overseas. The man wasn't even a Trump supporter and at the time; in fact, he supported Clinton. Moreover, in September 2016, "everyone" thought Clinton would win the election, including Cook. Clinton, AFAIK, never promised any great repatriation reprieves or discounts or whatever; thus there's no rational basis for asserting any Apple cash repatriation is attributable to anything having to do with Trump. Furthermore, unless and until Apple does repatriate the money, something it is not required to do and that it can at the "drop of a hat" opt not to do, it's premature for unrelated third parties to even remark about the prospect of their doing so, much less count on it happening.
What does "some measure" mean? How much is that exactly? Some measure of 200 billion meaning 20 bucks? Or closer to the 200 billion? They sure as hell never even considered any "some measure" during the obie years.
It means it was an empty promise designed to keep the looter politicians at bay.
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Thank you!

Tim Cook announced in September 2016 that Apple planned to repatriate some measure of its $200B+ held overseas. The man wasn't even a Trump supporter and at the time; in fact, he supported Clinton. Moreover, in September 2016, "everyone" thought Clinton would win the election, including Cook. Clinton, AFAIK, never promised any great repatriation reprieves or discounts or whatever; thus there's no rational basis for asserting any Apple cash repatriation is attributable to anything having to do with Trump. Furthermore, unless and until Apple does repatriate the money, something it is not required to do and that it can at the "drop of a hat" opt not to do, it's premature for unrelated third parties to even remark about the prospect of their doing so, much less count on it happening.
What does "some measure" mean? How much is that exactly? Some measure of 200 billion meaning 20 bucks? Or closer to the 200 billion? They sure as hell never even considered any "some measure" during the obie years.
It means it was an empty promise designed to keep the looter politicians at bay.
It means it was more left wing bullshit.
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Thank you!

Tim Cook announced in September 2016 that Apple planned to repatriate some measure of its $200B+ held overseas. The man wasn't even a Trump supporter and at the time; in fact, he supported Clinton. Moreover, in September 2016, "everyone" thought Clinton would win the election, including Cook. Clinton, AFAIK, never promised any great repatriation reprieves or discounts or whatever; thus there's no rational basis for asserting any Apple cash repatriation is attributable to anything having to do with Trump. Furthermore, unless and until Apple does repatriate the money, something it is not required to do and that it can at the "drop of a hat" opt not to do, it's premature for unrelated third parties to even remark about the prospect of their doing so, much less count on it happening.

That might have announced it but obviously they waited until the time was right. Smart move.
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Thank you!

Tim Cook announced in September 2016 that Apple planned to repatriate some measure of its $200B+ held overseas. The man wasn't even a Trump supporter and at the time; in fact, he supported Clinton. Moreover, in September 2016, "everyone" thought Clinton would win the election, including Cook. Clinton, AFAIK, never promised any great repatriation reprieves or discounts or whatever; thus there's no rational basis for asserting any Apple cash repatriation is attributable to anything having to do with Trump. Furthermore, unless and until Apple does repatriate the money, something it is not required to do and that it can at the "drop of a hat" opt not to do, it's premature for unrelated third parties to even remark about the prospect of their doing so, much less count on it happening.

That might have announced it but obviously they waited until the time was right. Smart move.
They were playing political games. It was all bullshit. Kind of like obies hope and change.
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Thank you!

Tim Cook announced in September 2016 that Apple planned to repatriate some measure of its $200B+ held overseas. The man wasn't even a Trump supporter and at the time; in fact, he supported Clinton. Moreover, in September 2016, "everyone" thought Clinton would win the election, including Cook. Clinton, AFAIK, never promised any great repatriation reprieves or discounts or whatever; thus there's no rational basis for asserting any Apple cash repatriation is attributable to anything having to do with Trump. Furthermore, unless and until Apple does repatriate the money, something it is not required to do and that it can at the "drop of a hat" opt not to do, it's premature for unrelated third parties to even remark about the prospect of their doing so, much less count on it happening.

That might have announced it but obviously they waited until the time was right. Smart move.
Tim Cook choosing when he does it, assuming he even does do it, is not indicative of any sort of Trump effect; it's a mark of Cook's prudence, which is all Cook's and has nothing to do with Trump.
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Thank you!

Tim Cook announced in September 2016 that Apple planned to repatriate some measure of its $200B+ held overseas. The man wasn't even a Trump supporter and at the time; in fact, he supported Clinton. Moreover, in September 2016, "everyone" thought Clinton would win the election, including Cook. Clinton, AFAIK, never promised any great repatriation reprieves or discounts or whatever; thus there's no rational basis for asserting any Apple cash repatriation is attributable to anything having to do with Trump. Furthermore, unless and until Apple does repatriate the money, something it is not required to do and that it can at the "drop of a hat" opt not to do, it's premature for unrelated third parties to even remark about the prospect of their doing so, much less count on it happening.

That might have announced it but obviously they waited until the time was right. Smart move.
Tim Cook choosing when he does it, assuming he even does do it, is not indicative of any sort of Trump effect; it's a mark of Cook's prudence, which is all Cook's and has nothing to do with Trump.
Well he didn't do it over the last eight years so?
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Thank you!

Tim Cook announced in September 2016 that Apple planned to repatriate some measure of its $200B+ held overseas. The man wasn't even a Trump supporter and at the time; in fact, he supported Clinton. Moreover, in September 2016, "everyone" thought Clinton would win the election, including Cook. Clinton, AFAIK, never promised any great repatriation reprieves or discounts or whatever; thus there's no rational basis for asserting any Apple cash repatriation is attributable to anything having to do with Trump. Furthermore, unless and until Apple does repatriate the money, something it is not required to do and that it can at the "drop of a hat" opt not to do, it's premature for unrelated third parties to even remark about the prospect of their doing so, much less count on it happening.

That might have announced it but obviously they waited until the time was right. Smart move.
Tim Cook choosing when he does it, assuming he even does do it, is not indicative of any sort of Trump effect; it's a mark of Cook's prudence, which is all Cook's and has nothing to do with Trump.

ROFL! So doing it during the Trump administation proves that Trump had nothing to do with it?

There's some kind of logic in there somewhere, but I'll be damned if I can find it.

"Prudence" means doing it when you can save $50 billion, and not one minute sooner.
 
The money was planned to return before and was unconditional on planned return despite the tax bill.
Thank you!

Tim Cook announced in September 2016 that Apple planned to repatriate some measure of its $200B+ held overseas. The man wasn't even a Trump supporter and at the time; in fact, he supported Clinton. Moreover, in September 2016, "everyone" thought Clinton would win the election, including Cook. Clinton, AFAIK, never promised any great repatriation reprieves or discounts or whatever; thus there's no rational basis for asserting any Apple cash repatriation is attributable to anything having to do with Trump. Furthermore, unless and until Apple does repatriate the money, something it is not required to do and that it can at the "drop of a hat" opt not to do, it's premature for unrelated third parties to even remark about the prospect of their doing so, much less count on it happening.

That might have announced it but obviously they waited until the time was right. Smart move.
Tim Cook choosing when he does it, assuming he even does do it, is not indicative of any sort of Trump effect; it's a mark of Cook's prudence, which is all Cook's and has nothing to do with Trump.
Just thinking after Bripat's post.

Was Cook being prudent by not bringing any of that money back during the high tax high regulation obie years because it would have been a losing move?
 

Forum List

Back
Top