Trump has eliminated $86 Billon in rules and regulations

Yep, but it wasn't fully developed until George Mitchell, using hundreds of millions of dollars in government research grants made it work.

George P. Mitchell DID improve known technology. Which has been my point when someone brings up 'new technology.'

Only because the government PAID him to do it.
The petroleum companies did more for improving the technology than any fucking career politician…

George Mitchel was the owner of an oil company dummy.

That's George 'P' Mitchel

OK
 
The significantly lower cost of natural gas had nothing to do with coal sales reducing?






What part of TECHNOLOGY do you not understand?

The commodities market reducing the cost of natural gas is technology?
Fossil fuel's are not going anywhere, because they are reliable the same cannot be said about renewable energy… Fact

Yes, for now, gas and oil are here to stay. coal will be around for a while too, but gas is much cheaper, and the numbers of employees won't be anywhere near what it once was, or the amount Trump promised.
There will always be coal mining in Wyoming there's 1000 year supply plus, along with oil drilling and Fracking...

Lots of whales left too, but not as much call for whale oil for lamps. Just because it's there doesn't mean it will be needed.
 
President Trump has saved taxpayers more than $86 billion in regulatory costs during his first three months in the White House, according to a new study from a conservative group.

The American Action Forum (AAF) points to several Obama-era regulations that Trump has either rolled back on his own or with the help of Republican lawmakers using the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

Study: Trump has eliminated $86B in regs

Remember the whole point of Obama et.al. was to make the costs of doing business so prohibitive the businesses would go bankrupt.
Remember these comments?
Obama wanted to bankrupt 1,400 companies, that pay $100 billion a year in taxes and unemploy 450,000 people that work for these companies! (Obama told us he favored a "single payer health system... so what happens to the above?)
" if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can – it’s just that it will bankrupt them.” (Pretty easy way of increasing unemployment.)
"I prefer higher gas prices". (And Obama signed 40% fewer Federal oil lease exploration then Bush).
Trump will never tell a foreign country such as "Brazil to develop oil and that the USA will be their best customer"!
"Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." (That certainly puts a dent in the pocketbook..._
Trump will never tour the world tearing America and Americans down as Obama did his first year... just so he could travel!

Trump like most of us understand that the more the government attaches rules and regulations the more
costs to the company,especially smaller companies which put these smaller companies at a disadvantage.

One recent survey, released just in time for Donald J. Trump's inauguration, dropped this eye-popping number: at least $12,000 a year.
And you don't even want to know what a start-up spends on regulations in its first year.
However, I'll tell you anyway — a whopping $83,019.
These figures come from the first-ever Small Business Regulations Survey, conducted by the National Small Business Association, which of course makes it its business to reduce the regulatory burden on small businesses. Among other conclusions, the survey found that 44 percent of businesses spend at least 40 hours a year dealing with federal regulations, and 29 percent spend at least that much on state and local rules. Three-quarters of business owners say that they have spent time reading proposed rules at least once, and of these, not quite two-thirds discover that more than half the time, the rules they've read wouldn't apply to them. About 40 percent of respondents claim that they have held off making a new investment because of a regulation at some point in the past.

Twenty-two percent of the business owners found the Obamacare's regulations somewhat burdensome, and 43 percent found it very burdensome. Yet the overwhelming majority of the respondents — 82 percent of them — have 20 or fewer employees. And if a business owner needs to know one thing about the Affordable Care Act, it's this: if you have fewer than 50 employees, the Affordable Care Act does not apply to you, at all.

The $83,000 Question: How Much Do Regulations Really Cost Small Businesses?

is it any wonder that with employers encouraged by Trump's PRO-business stance that .......
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Forbes..Globalist, Supply Side, Neo-Conservative Publication.
Glad to see you becoming a Conservative.
 
President Trump has saved taxpayers more than $86 billion in regulatory costs during his first three months in the White House, according to a new study from a conservative group.

The American Action Forum (AAF) points to several Obama-era regulations that Trump has either rolled back on his own or with the help of Republican lawmakers using the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

Study: Trump has eliminated $86B in regs

Remember the whole point of Obama et.al. was to make the costs of doing business so prohibitive the businesses would go bankrupt.
Remember these comments?
Obama wanted to bankrupt 1,400 companies, that pay $100 billion a year in taxes and unemploy 450,000 people that work for these companies! (Obama told us he favored a "single payer health system... so what happens to the above?)
" if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can – it’s just that it will bankrupt them.” (Pretty easy way of increasing unemployment.)
"I prefer higher gas prices". (And Obama signed 40% fewer Federal oil lease exploration then Bush).
Trump will never tell a foreign country such as "Brazil to develop oil and that the USA will be their best customer"!
"Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." (That certainly puts a dent in the pocketbook..._
Trump will never tour the world tearing America and Americans down as Obama did his first year... just so he could travel!

Trump like most of us understand that the more the government attaches rules and regulations the more
costs to the company,especially smaller companies which put these smaller companies at a disadvantage.

One recent survey, released just in time for Donald J. Trump's inauguration, dropped this eye-popping number: at least $12,000 a year.
And you don't even want to know what a start-up spends on regulations in its first year.
However, I'll tell you anyway — a whopping $83,019.
These figures come from the first-ever Small Business Regulations Survey, conducted by the National Small Business Association, which of course makes it its business to reduce the regulatory burden on small businesses. Among other conclusions, the survey found that 44 percent of businesses spend at least 40 hours a year dealing with federal regulations, and 29 percent spend at least that much on state and local rules. Three-quarters of business owners say that they have spent time reading proposed rules at least once, and of these, not quite two-thirds discover that more than half the time, the rules they've read wouldn't apply to them. About 40 percent of respondents claim that they have held off making a new investment because of a regulation at some point in the past.

Twenty-two percent of the business owners found the Obamacare's regulations somewhat burdensome, and 43 percent found it very burdensome. Yet the overwhelming majority of the respondents — 82 percent of them — have 20 or fewer employees. And if a business owner needs to know one thing about the Affordable Care Act, it's this: if you have fewer than 50 employees, the Affordable Care Act does not apply to you, at all.

The $83,000 Question: How Much Do Regulations Really Cost Small Businesses?

is it any wonder that with employers encouraged by Trump's PRO-business stance that .......
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Forbes..Globalist, Supply Side, Neo-Conservative Publication.
Glad to see you becoming a Conservative.

Imagine a Globalist, Supply Side Neo-Conservative Publication saying the exact same thing that I am. All those coal jobs won't be back, and you can't whine about a liberal source. You lose.
 
President Trump has saved taxpayers more than $86 billion in regulatory costs during his first three months in the White House, according to a new study from a conservative group.

The American Action Forum (AAF) points to several Obama-era regulations that Trump has either rolled back on his own or with the help of Republican lawmakers using the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

Study: Trump has eliminated $86B in regs

Remember the whole point of Obama et.al. was to make the costs of doing business so prohibitive the businesses would go bankrupt.
Remember these comments?
Obama wanted to bankrupt 1,400 companies, that pay $100 billion a year in taxes and unemploy 450,000 people that work for these companies! (Obama told us he favored a "single payer health system... so what happens to the above?)
" if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can – it’s just that it will bankrupt them.” (Pretty easy way of increasing unemployment.)
"I prefer higher gas prices". (And Obama signed 40% fewer Federal oil lease exploration then Bush).
Trump will never tell a foreign country such as "Brazil to develop oil and that the USA will be their best customer"!
"Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." (That certainly puts a dent in the pocketbook..._
Trump will never tour the world tearing America and Americans down as Obama did his first year... just so he could travel!

Trump like most of us understand that the more the government attaches rules and regulations the more
costs to the company,especially smaller companies which put these smaller companies at a disadvantage.

One recent survey, released just in time for Donald J. Trump's inauguration, dropped this eye-popping number: at least $12,000 a year.
And you don't even want to know what a start-up spends on regulations in its first year.
However, I'll tell you anyway — a whopping $83,019.
These figures come from the first-ever Small Business Regulations Survey, conducted by the National Small Business Association, which of course makes it its business to reduce the regulatory burden on small businesses. Among other conclusions, the survey found that 44 percent of businesses spend at least 40 hours a year dealing with federal regulations, and 29 percent spend at least that much on state and local rules. Three-quarters of business owners say that they have spent time reading proposed rules at least once, and of these, not quite two-thirds discover that more than half the time, the rules they've read wouldn't apply to them. About 40 percent of respondents claim that they have held off making a new investment because of a regulation at some point in the past.

Twenty-two percent of the business owners found the Obamacare's regulations somewhat burdensome, and 43 percent found it very burdensome. Yet the overwhelming majority of the respondents — 82 percent of them — have 20 or fewer employees. And if a business owner needs to know one thing about the Affordable Care Act, it's this: if you have fewer than 50 employees, the Affordable Care Act does not apply to you, at all.

The $83,000 Question: How Much Do Regulations Really Cost Small Businesses?

is it any wonder that with employers encouraged by Trump's PRO-business stance that .......
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Forbes..Globalist, Supply Side, Neo-Conservative Publication.
Glad to see you becoming a Conservative.

Imagine a Globalist, Supply Side Neo-Conservative Publication saying the exact same thing that I am. All those coal jobs won't be back, and you can't whine about a liberal source. You lose.
You're missing the point.
The choice is now up to market demand, not legislation.
 
President Trump has saved taxpayers more than $86 billion in regulatory costs during his first three months in the White House, according to a new study from a conservative group.

The American Action Forum (AAF) points to several Obama-era regulations that Trump has either rolled back on his own or with the help of Republican lawmakers using the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

Study: Trump has eliminated $86B in regs

Remember the whole point of Obama et.al. was to make the costs of doing business so prohibitive the businesses would go bankrupt.
Remember these comments?
Obama wanted to bankrupt 1,400 companies, that pay $100 billion a year in taxes and unemploy 450,000 people that work for these companies! (Obama told us he favored a "single payer health system... so what happens to the above?)
" if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can – it’s just that it will bankrupt them.” (Pretty easy way of increasing unemployment.)
"I prefer higher gas prices". (And Obama signed 40% fewer Federal oil lease exploration then Bush).
Trump will never tell a foreign country such as "Brazil to develop oil and that the USA will be their best customer"!
"Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." (That certainly puts a dent in the pocketbook..._
Trump will never tour the world tearing America and Americans down as Obama did his first year... just so he could travel!

Trump like most of us understand that the more the government attaches rules and regulations the more
costs to the company,especially smaller companies which put these smaller companies at a disadvantage.

One recent survey, released just in time for Donald J. Trump's inauguration, dropped this eye-popping number: at least $12,000 a year.
And you don't even want to know what a start-up spends on regulations in its first year.
However, I'll tell you anyway — a whopping $83,019.
These figures come from the first-ever Small Business Regulations Survey, conducted by the National Small Business Association, which of course makes it its business to reduce the regulatory burden on small businesses. Among other conclusions, the survey found that 44 percent of businesses spend at least 40 hours a year dealing with federal regulations, and 29 percent spend at least that much on state and local rules. Three-quarters of business owners say that they have spent time reading proposed rules at least once, and of these, not quite two-thirds discover that more than half the time, the rules they've read wouldn't apply to them. About 40 percent of respondents claim that they have held off making a new investment because of a regulation at some point in the past.

Twenty-two percent of the business owners found the Obamacare's regulations somewhat burdensome, and 43 percent found it very burdensome. Yet the overwhelming majority of the respondents — 82 percent of them — have 20 or fewer employees. And if a business owner needs to know one thing about the Affordable Care Act, it's this: if you have fewer than 50 employees, the Affordable Care Act does not apply to you, at all.

The $83,000 Question: How Much Do Regulations Really Cost Small Businesses?

is it any wonder that with employers encouraged by Trump's PRO-business stance that .......
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Forbes..Globalist, Supply Side, Neo-Conservative Publication.
Glad to see you becoming a Conservative.

Imagine a Globalist, Supply Side Neo-Conservative Publication saying the exact same thing that I am. All those coal jobs won't be back, and you can't whine about a liberal source. You lose.
You're missing the point.
The choice is now up to market demand, not legislation.
And the market has determined that a large amount of coal jobs just aren't needed, and there is no reason to believe they will ever be needed again.
 
President Trump has saved taxpayers more than $86 billion in regulatory costs during his first three months in the White House, according to a new study from a conservative group.

The American Action Forum (AAF) points to several Obama-era regulations that Trump has either rolled back on his own or with the help of Republican lawmakers using the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

Study: Trump has eliminated $86B in regs

Remember the whole point of Obama et.al. was to make the costs of doing business so prohibitive the businesses would go bankrupt.
Remember these comments?
Obama wanted to bankrupt 1,400 companies, that pay $100 billion a year in taxes and unemploy 450,000 people that work for these companies! (Obama told us he favored a "single payer health system... so what happens to the above?)
" if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can – it’s just that it will bankrupt them.” (Pretty easy way of increasing unemployment.)
"I prefer higher gas prices". (And Obama signed 40% fewer Federal oil lease exploration then Bush).
Trump will never tell a foreign country such as "Brazil to develop oil and that the USA will be their best customer"!
"Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." (That certainly puts a dent in the pocketbook..._
Trump will never tour the world tearing America and Americans down as Obama did his first year... just so he could travel!

Trump like most of us understand that the more the government attaches rules and regulations the more
costs to the company,especially smaller companies which put these smaller companies at a disadvantage.

One recent survey, released just in time for Donald J. Trump's inauguration, dropped this eye-popping number: at least $12,000 a year.
And you don't even want to know what a start-up spends on regulations in its first year.
However, I'll tell you anyway — a whopping $83,019.
These figures come from the first-ever Small Business Regulations Survey, conducted by the National Small Business Association, which of course makes it its business to reduce the regulatory burden on small businesses. Among other conclusions, the survey found that 44 percent of businesses spend at least 40 hours a year dealing with federal regulations, and 29 percent spend at least that much on state and local rules. Three-quarters of business owners say that they have spent time reading proposed rules at least once, and of these, not quite two-thirds discover that more than half the time, the rules they've read wouldn't apply to them. About 40 percent of respondents claim that they have held off making a new investment because of a regulation at some point in the past.

Twenty-two percent of the business owners found the Obamacare's regulations somewhat burdensome, and 43 percent found it very burdensome. Yet the overwhelming majority of the respondents — 82 percent of them — have 20 or fewer employees. And if a business owner needs to know one thing about the Affordable Care Act, it's this: if you have fewer than 50 employees, the Affordable Care Act does not apply to you, at all.

The $83,000 Question: How Much Do Regulations Really Cost Small Businesses?

is it any wonder that with employers encouraged by Trump's PRO-business stance that .......
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Forbes..Globalist, Supply Side, Neo-Conservative Publication.
Glad to see you becoming a Conservative.

Imagine a Globalist, Supply Side Neo-Conservative Publication saying the exact same thing that I am. All those coal jobs won't be back, and you can't whine about a liberal source. You lose.
You're missing the point.
The choice is now up to market demand, not legislation.
And the market has determined that a large amount of coal jobs just aren't needed, and there is no reason to believe they will ever be needed again.
Exactly; which is why legislation was a waste of money.
 
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Forbes..Globalist, Supply Side, Neo-Conservative Publication.
Glad to see you becoming a Conservative.

Imagine a Globalist, Supply Side Neo-Conservative Publication saying the exact same thing that I am. All those coal jobs won't be back, and you can't whine about a liberal source. You lose.
You're missing the point.
The choice is now up to market demand, not legislation.
And the market has determined that a large amount of coal jobs just aren't needed, and there is no reason to believe they will ever be needed again.
Exactly; which is why legislation was a waste of money.

Legislation had nothing to do with employees. It was about environmental impact.
 
Forbes..Globalist, Supply Side, Neo-Conservative Publication.
Glad to see you becoming a Conservative.

Imagine a Globalist, Supply Side Neo-Conservative Publication saying the exact same thing that I am. All those coal jobs won't be back, and you can't whine about a liberal source. You lose.
You're missing the point.
The choice is now up to market demand, not legislation.
And the market has determined that a large amount of coal jobs just aren't needed, and there is no reason to believe they will ever be needed again.
Exactly; which is why legislation was a waste of money.

Legislation had nothing to do with employees. It was about environmental impact.
Which, as you pointed out, is virtually zero.
So why sustain regulations for a non-issue?
 
Forbes..Globalist, Supply Side, Neo-Conservative Publication.
Glad to see you becoming a Conservative.

Imagine a Globalist, Supply Side Neo-Conservative Publication saying the exact same thing that I am. All those coal jobs won't be back, and you can't whine about a liberal source. You lose.
You're missing the point.
The choice is now up to market demand, not legislation.
And the market has determined that a large amount of coal jobs just aren't needed, and there is no reason to believe they will ever be needed again.
Exactly; which is why legislation was a waste of money.

Legislation had nothing to do with employees. It was about environmental impact.

When Obama said:" if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can – it’s just that it will bankrupt them.”
He showed his economic ignorance. Because when you "bankrupt" a company that means no jobs. Means no payroll taxes. Means unemployment checks.
It is that simple. He spouted something stupid because IT WAS POLITICAL Correct...not in the best interest of the country!
Or when he told Brazil.."Brazil to develop oil and that the USA will be their best customer"! How can any president be so stupid! Wanting the USA dependent on foreign oil!
But when he said:Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket"
Why else other then he wanted the USA to become a 3rd world country! How stupid!
And so this economically shrift president LIES about "46 million uninsured Americans " or "half of Americans have a pre-existing condition"! To do what? Destroy our
health system. Truly Obama will go down in history as one of the most destructive presidents ever!
 
Imagine a Globalist, Supply Side Neo-Conservative Publication saying the exact same thing that I am. All those coal jobs won't be back, and you can't whine about a liberal source. You lose.
You're missing the point.
The choice is now up to market demand, not legislation.
And the market has determined that a large amount of coal jobs just aren't needed, and there is no reason to believe they will ever be needed again.
Exactly; which is why legislation was a waste of money.

Legislation had nothing to do with employees. It was about environmental impact.
Which, as you pointed out, is virtually zero.
So why sustain regulations for a non-issue?

When did I say the use of coal has little or no impact? The production of coal hasn't stopped even if it has been reduced, and the need for large numbers of workers has been replaced with automation. Coal is still a large source of pollution, and regulations are still needed.
 
Oh and of course who can forget ACA's causing this:
Yes, Some Companies Are Cutting Hours In Response To ‘Obamacare’

30hourworkweek.png
 
Ahhhhhh, bulldoggy has a sad.... Amazing what TECHNOLOGY will do for you. Unlike your hero obummer who wanted to close all of the mines, under trump they are open and hiring. So....ZERO jobs under your hero obummer vs jobs under the trumpster.

Epic fail bodey, epic fail....

The significantly lower cost of natural gas had nothing to do with coal sales reducing?






What part of TECHNOLOGY do you not understand?

The commodities market reducing the cost of natural gas is technology?
Fossil fuel's are not going anywhere, because they are reliable the same cannot be said about renewable energy… Fact

So far. Tesla is currently developing battery technology that can power a car over 1000 miles.
Tesla is a joke... not only are the cars fucking butt ugly they just suck all together…
 
What part of TECHNOLOGY do you not understand?

The commodities market reducing the cost of natural gas is technology?
Fossil fuel's are not going anywhere, because they are reliable the same cannot be said about renewable energy… Fact

Yes, for now, gas and oil are here to stay. coal will be around for a while too, but gas is much cheaper, and the numbers of employees won't be anywhere near what it once was, or the amount Trump promised.
There will always be coal mining in Wyoming there's 1000 year supply plus, along with oil drilling and Fracking...

Lots of whales left too, but not as much call for whale oil for lamps. Just because it's there doesn't mean it will be needed.
I'm an all of the above type of guy, that being said renewable energy is decades away because it has to be reliable and abundant neither of which can be said now…
 
President Trump has saved taxpayers more than $86 billion in regulatory costs during his first three months in the White House, according to a new study from a conservative group.

The American Action Forum (AAF) points to several Obama-era regulations that Trump has either rolled back on his own or with the help of Republican lawmakers using the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

Study: Trump has eliminated $86B in regs

Remember the whole point of Obama et.al. was to make the costs of doing business so prohibitive the businesses would go bankrupt.
Remember these comments?
Obama wanted to bankrupt 1,400 companies, that pay $100 billion a year in taxes and unemploy 450,000 people that work for these companies! (Obama told us he favored a "single payer health system... so what happens to the above?)
" if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can – it’s just that it will bankrupt them.” (Pretty easy way of increasing unemployment.)
"I prefer higher gas prices". (And Obama signed 40% fewer Federal oil lease exploration then Bush).
Trump will never tell a foreign country such as "Brazil to develop oil and that the USA will be their best customer"!
"Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." (That certainly puts a dent in the pocketbook..._
Trump will never tour the world tearing America and Americans down as Obama did his first year... just so he could travel!

Trump like most of us understand that the more the government attaches rules and regulations the more
costs to the company,especially smaller companies which put these smaller companies at a disadvantage.

One recent survey, released just in time for Donald J. Trump's inauguration, dropped this eye-popping number: at least $12,000 a year.
And you don't even want to know what a start-up spends on regulations in its first year.
However, I'll tell you anyway — a whopping $83,019.
These figures come from the first-ever Small Business Regulations Survey, conducted by the National Small Business Association, which of course makes it its business to reduce the regulatory burden on small businesses. Among other conclusions, the survey found that 44 percent of businesses spend at least 40 hours a year dealing with federal regulations, and 29 percent spend at least that much on state and local rules. Three-quarters of business owners say that they have spent time reading proposed rules at least once, and of these, not quite two-thirds discover that more than half the time, the rules they've read wouldn't apply to them. About 40 percent of respondents claim that they have held off making a new investment because of a regulation at some point in the past.

Twenty-two percent of the business owners found the Obamacare's regulations somewhat burdensome, and 43 percent found it very burdensome. Yet the overwhelming majority of the respondents — 82 percent of them — have 20 or fewer employees. And if a business owner needs to know one thing about the Affordable Care Act, it's this: if you have fewer than 50 employees, the Affordable Care Act does not apply to you, at all.

The $83,000 Question: How Much Do Regulations Really Cost Small Businesses?

is it any wonder that with employers encouraged by Trump's PRO-business stance that .......
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations


You are absolutely right! The severe DAMAGE done by Obama in destroying peoples' livelihood and therefore peoples lives has permanently killed many
coal mining jobs! People tried to point this out to Obama but he didn't care about these people. Remember Obama's attitude about these people was evident
in this statement Obama made about Pennsylvanians....
Obama said, “They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” Obama on small-town Pa.: Clinging to religion, guns, xenophobia
Date of the above link:April 11, 2008 this would make it April 6,2008...
Cheap gas killed the coal mining jobs.
 
'Trump has eliminated $86 Billon in rules and regulations'

That's not hard to believe considering Obama set a new record for the number of (oppressive) regulations added...
 
President Trump has saved taxpayers more than $86 billion in regulatory costs during his first three months in the White House, according to a new study from a conservative group.

The American Action Forum (AAF) points to several Obama-era regulations that Trump has either rolled back on his own or with the help of Republican lawmakers using the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

Study: Trump has eliminated $86B in regs

Remember the whole point of Obama et.al. was to make the costs of doing business so prohibitive the businesses would go bankrupt.
Remember these comments?
Obama wanted to bankrupt 1,400 companies, that pay $100 billion a year in taxes and unemploy 450,000 people that work for these companies! (Obama told us he favored a "single payer health system... so what happens to the above?)
" if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can – it’s just that it will bankrupt them.” (Pretty easy way of increasing unemployment.)
"I prefer higher gas prices". (And Obama signed 40% fewer Federal oil lease exploration then Bush).
Trump will never tell a foreign country such as "Brazil to develop oil and that the USA will be their best customer"!
"Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." (That certainly puts a dent in the pocketbook..._
Trump will never tour the world tearing America and Americans down as Obama did his first year... just so he could travel!

Trump like most of us understand that the more the government attaches rules and regulations the more
costs to the company,especially smaller companies which put these smaller companies at a disadvantage.

One recent survey, released just in time for Donald J. Trump's inauguration, dropped this eye-popping number: at least $12,000 a year.
And you don't even want to know what a start-up spends on regulations in its first year.
However, I'll tell you anyway — a whopping $83,019.
These figures come from the first-ever Small Business Regulations Survey, conducted by the National Small Business Association, which of course makes it its business to reduce the regulatory burden on small businesses. Among other conclusions, the survey found that 44 percent of businesses spend at least 40 hours a year dealing with federal regulations, and 29 percent spend at least that much on state and local rules. Three-quarters of business owners say that they have spent time reading proposed rules at least once, and of these, not quite two-thirds discover that more than half the time, the rules they've read wouldn't apply to them. About 40 percent of respondents claim that they have held off making a new investment because of a regulation at some point in the past.

Twenty-two percent of the business owners found the Obamacare's regulations somewhat burdensome, and 43 percent found it very burdensome. Yet the overwhelming majority of the respondents — 82 percent of them — have 20 or fewer employees. And if a business owner needs to know one thing about the Affordable Care Act, it's this: if you have fewer than 50 employees, the Affordable Care Act does not apply to you, at all.

The $83,000 Question: How Much Do Regulations Really Cost Small Businesses?

is it any wonder that with employers encouraged by Trump's PRO-business stance that .......
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Number of people collecting unemployment checks hits 17-year low, jobless claims show
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Mass Employment In Coal Mining Is Never Coming Back, No Matter Trump's Promises Or Regulations
Forbes..Globalist, Supply Side, Neo-Conservative Publication.
Glad to see you becoming a Conservative.

Imagine a Globalist, Supply Side Neo-Conservative Publication saying the exact same thing that I am. All those coal jobs won't be back, and you can't whine about a liberal source. You lose.
You're missing the point.
The choice is now up to market demand, not legislation.
And the market has determined that a large amount of coal jobs just aren't needed, and there is no reason to believe they will ever be needed again.

Those that control commodities needed to make more monies. Coal jobs were just....collateral damage.
 
Imagine a Globalist, Supply Side Neo-Conservative Publication saying the exact same thing that I am. All those coal jobs won't be back, and you can't whine about a liberal source. You lose.
You're missing the point.
The choice is now up to market demand, not legislation.
And the market has determined that a large amount of coal jobs just aren't needed, and there is no reason to believe they will ever be needed again.
Exactly; which is why legislation was a waste of money.

Legislation had nothing to do with employees. It was about environmental impact.

When Obama said:" if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can – it’s just that it will bankrupt them.”
He showed his economic ignorance. Because when you "bankrupt" a company that means no jobs. Means no payroll taxes. Means unemployment checks.
It is that simple. He spouted something stupid because IT WAS POLITICAL Correct...not in the best interest of the country!
Or when he told Brazil.."Brazil to develop oil and that the USA will be their best customer"! How can any president be so stupid! Wanting the USA dependent on foreign oil!
But when he said:Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket"
Why else other then he wanted the USA to become a 3rd world country! How stupid!
And so this economically shrift president LIES about "46 million uninsured Americans " or "half of Americans have a pre-existing condition"! To do what? Destroy our
health system. Truly Obama will go down in history as one of the most destructive presidents ever!

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted.

That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches.

The only thing I've said with respect to coal, I haven't been some coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off the table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it.

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can.

It's just that it will bankrupt them.

Whats wrong with that?
 
The significantly lower cost of natural gas had nothing to do with coal sales reducing?






What part of TECHNOLOGY do you not understand?

The commodities market reducing the cost of natural gas is technology?
Fossil fuel's are not going anywhere, because they are reliable the same cannot be said about renewable energy… Fact

So far. Tesla is currently developing battery technology that can power a car over 1000 miles.
Tesla is a joke... not only are the cars fucking butt ugly they just suck all together…

http://cdn.bgr.com/2016/03/tesla-model-s-p90d.jpg?quality=98&strip=all
 

Forum List

Back
Top