Trump Isn't Another Hitler -- He's Another Obama...

[Dschrute3]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

 

[BlackFlag]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Well he's not black, so don't expect much support from your rubes

 

[Dschrute3]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Well he's not black, so don't expect much support from your rubes

Calm down kid. Not everything's about race.

 

[BlackFlag]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Well he's not black, so don't expect much support from your rubes

Calm down kid. Not everything's about race.

Meanwhile, you're rubes: "crickets..."

 

[Dschrute3]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Well he's not black, so don't expect much support from your rubes

Calm down kid. Not everything's about race.

Meanwhile, you're rubes: "crickets..."

By 'rubes', i'm guessing you mean Republicans. Most Republicans disagree with me bigtime on matters of war. So if any do show up, they'll mostly come to attack me. Most in both Parties are all-in on aggressive Foreign Interventionism.

 

[Dschrute3]

Americans really do need to reconsider supporting this 'Empire-Building' agenda. We're $21 Trillion in Debt, and spread way too thin around the world. All Empires fall. Why would the US be an exception?

 

[gipper]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Yet millions of Americans have been duped into believing Ds and Rs are polar opposites. When will they wake up?

W and BO are blood brothers. Both men are warmongers, interventionists, statists, and elitists. It is too early to lump The Don in with those two assholes, but the signs are there that he is very much like them.

 

[Dschrute3]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Yet millions of Americans have been duped into believing Ds and Rs are polar opposites. When will they wake up?

W and BO are blood brothers. Both men are warmongers, interventionists, statists, and elitists. It is too early to lump The Don in with those two assholes, but the signs are there that he is very much like them.

Yeah i hope Trump doesn't go the Warmonger route, but it does look he's allowing the Neocons much more control in his Administration. And that can only = more war. I guess we'll have to wait and see, but it i'm not optimistic.

 

[gipper]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Yet millions of Americans have been duped into believing Ds and Rs are polar opposites. When will they wake up?

W and BO are blood brothers. Both men are warmongers, interventionists, statists, and elitists. It is too early to lump The Don in with those two assholes, but the signs are there that he is very much like them.

Yeah i hope Trump doesn't go the Warmonger route, but it does look he's allowing the Neocons much more control in his Administration. And that can only = more war. I guess we'll have to wait and see, but it i'm not optimistic.

I am not optimistic either. His missile attack on Syria based on flawed evidence, could have been an early indication.

Look at members of his administration. Many are of the military. That may not indicate they are warmongers, but it might.

 

[miketx]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Well he's not black, so don't expect much support from your rubes

Calm down kid. Not everything's about race.

Meanwhile, you're rubes: "crickets..."

lol, it's just that it's pointless to argue with regressive butt stained libs. No one cares what you carp about in your daily rant fetish that makes you somehow feel powerful like when a dog eats turds out of the cat box.

 

[Dschrute3]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Yet millions of Americans have been duped into believing Ds and Rs are polar opposites. When will they wake up?

W and BO are blood brothers. Both men are warmongers, interventionists, statists, and elitists. It is too early to lump The Don in with those two assholes, but the signs are there that he is very much like them.

Yeah i hope Trump doesn't go the Warmonger route, but it does look he's allowing the Neocons much more control in his Administration. And that can only = more war. I guess we'll have to wait and see, but it i'm not optimistic.

I am not optimistic either. His missile attack on Syria based on flawed evidence, could have been an early indication.

Look at members of his administration. Many are of the military. That may not indicate they are warmongers, but it might.

I'm definitely concerned about his willingness to allow Neocons so much power in his Administration. Those are the folks he routinely criticized when he was running for President. He despised Bush and his cronies. I am very concerned about the direction he's headed in.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Well he's not black, so don't expect much support from your rubes

wait are you saying if he was black to expect a lot of support from our side.....hey thanks for showing your friends the racist label was wrong.

 

[miketx]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Yet millions of Americans have been duped into believing Ds and Rs are polar opposites. When will they wake up?

W and BO are blood brothers. Both men are warmongers, interventionists, statists, and elitists. It is too early to lump The Don in with those two assholes, but the signs are there that he is very much like them.

Yeah i hope Trump doesn't go the Warmonger route, but it does look he's allowing the Neocons much more control in his Administration. And that can only = more war. I guess we'll have to wait and see, but it i'm not optimistic.

I am not optimistic either. His missile attack on Syria based on flawed evidence, could have been an early indication.

Look at members of his administration. Many are of the military. That may not indicate they are warmongers, but it might.

I'm definitely concerned about his willingness to allow Neocons so much power in his Administration. Those are the folks he routinely criticized when he was running for President. He despised Bush and his cronies. I am very concerned about the direction he's headed in.

As long as its a forward direction and not backwards like jughead, it's all good right?

 

[Aldo Raine]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Well he's not black, so don't expect much support from your rubes

Calm down kid. Not everything's about race.

Meanwhile, you're rubes: "crickets..."

By 'rubes', i'm guessing you mean Republicans. Most Republicans disagree with me bigtime on matters of war. So if any do show up, they'll mostly come to attack me. Most in both Parties are all-in on aggressive Foreign Interventionism.

I don't see that, in fact I believe most of this country is sick to death of us being at war.

 

[Dschrute3]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Yet millions of Americans have been duped into believing Ds and Rs are polar opposites. When will they wake up?

W and BO are blood brothers. Both men are warmongers, interventionists, statists, and elitists. It is too early to lump The Don in with those two assholes, but the signs are there that he is very much like them.

Yeah i hope Trump doesn't go the Warmonger route, but it does look he's allowing the Neocons much more control in his Administration. And that can only = more war. I guess we'll have to wait and see, but it i'm not optimistic.

I am not optimistic either. His missile attack on Syria based on flawed evidence, could have been an early indication.

Look at members of his administration. Many are of the military. That may not indicate they are warmongers, but it might.

I'm definitely concerned about his willingness to allow Neocons so much power in his Administration. Those are the folks he routinely criticized when he was running for President. He despised Bush and his cronies. I am very concerned about the direction he's headed in.

As long as its a forward direction and not backwards like jughead, it's all good right?

Well, i'm still a bit concerned about him handing so much power & control over to the Neocons. Those are the folks he's routinely criticized over the years. If he allows them more power, it won't end well for him.

 

[miketx]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Well he's not black, so don't expect much support from your rubes

Calm down kid. Not everything's about race.

Meanwhile, you're rubes: "crickets..."

By 'rubes', i'm guessing you mean Republicans. Most Republicans disagree with me bigtime on matters of war. So if any do show up, they'll mostly come to attack me. Most in both Parties are all-in on aggressive Foreign Interventionism.

I don't see that, in fact I believe most of this country is sick to death of us being at war.

Not only that we are sick of giving aide to countries that routinely crap on us.

 

[Dschrute3]

Great article by Caitlin Johnstone of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


Not a lot of people remember this, but George W Bush actually campaigned in 2000 against the interventionist foreign policy that the United States had been increasingly espousing. Far from advocating the full-scale regime change ground invasions that his administration is now infamous for, Bush frequently used the word “humble” when discussing the type of foreign policy he favored, condemning nation-building, an over-extended military, and the notion that America should be the world’s police force.

Eight years later, after hundreds of thousands of human lives had been snuffed out in Iraq and Afghanistan and an entire region horrifically destabilized, Obama campaigned against Bush’s interventionist foreign policy, edging out Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries partly because she had supported the Iraq invasion while he had condemned it. The Democrats, decrying the warmongering tendencies of the Republicans, elected a President of the United States who would see Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq and raise him Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, along with a tenfold increase in drone strikes. Libya collapsed into a failed state where a slave trade now runs rampant, and half a million people died in the Syrian war that Obama and US allies exponentially escalated...

Read More:
Trump Isn’t Another Hitler. He’s Another Obama.

Well he's not black, so don't expect much support from your rubes

Calm down kid. Not everything's about race.

Meanwhile, you're rubes: "crickets..."

By 'rubes', i'm guessing you mean Republicans. Most Republicans disagree with me bigtime on matters of war. So if any do show up, they'll mostly come to attack me. Most in both Parties are all-in on aggressive Foreign Interventionism.

I don't see that, in fact I believe most of this country is sick to death of us being at war.

I'd like to believe that, but i can't. It seems Americans love their war. They can't get enough of it.

 

[Aldo Raine]

Well he's not black, so don't expect much support from your rubes

Calm down kid. Not everything's about race.

Meanwhile, you're rubes: "crickets..."

By 'rubes', i'm guessing you mean Republicans. Most Republicans disagree with me bigtime on matters of war. So if any do show up, they'll mostly come to attack me. Most in both Parties are all-in on aggressive Foreign Interventionism.

I don't see that, in fact I believe most of this country is sick to death of us being at war.

Not only that we are sick of giving aide to countries that routinely crap on us.

Agreed!

 

[miketx]

Well he's not black, so don't expect much support from your rubes

Calm down kid. Not everything's about race.

Meanwhile, you're rubes: "crickets..."

By 'rubes', i'm guessing you mean Republicans. Most Republicans disagree with me bigtime on matters of war. So if any do show up, they'll mostly come to attack me. Most in both Parties are all-in on aggressive Foreign Interventionism.

I don't see that, in fact I believe most of this country is sick to death of us being at war.

I'd like to believe that, but i can't. It seems Americans love their war. They can't get enough of it.

It's ok foreigner, just take comfort in the fact that if we have to we can kick whatever turd country you are from into the stone age.

 

[Aldo Raine]

Well he's not black, so don't expect much support from your rubes

Calm down kid. Not everything's about race.

Meanwhile, you're rubes: "crickets..."

By 'rubes', i'm guessing you mean Republicans. Most Republicans disagree with me bigtime on matters of war. So if any do show up, they'll mostly come to attack me. Most in both Parties are all-in on aggressive Foreign Interventionism.

I don't see that, in fact I believe most of this country is sick to death of us being at war.

I'd like to believe that, but i can't. It seems Americans love their war. They can't get enough of it.

Our politicians and the industrial war machine do. The citizens, not so much.