Trump LOST A SEAT!!!! Cry the liberals!!!! Their messiah in chief lost over 1000. LOL!!!

They are all claiming this is a "REFRENDUM!!!!" on TRRRUMMMMP!!!!

LOL!!!

Anyone remember any of these losers saying anything close to that shit as their pathetic socialist in chief lost over 1000 seats during his divisive presidency?

BTW, while we are on the subject, has there ever been a president more divisive than obama? Can't think of any.
WTF??

How many seats did Democrats lose by November, 2009?

You people lost 4 House seats in a row to Trump since he kicked the shit out of Hillary. The last one you libs poured $50 million dollars into that race, a ton of out of state money you tried to buy the seat and still got your ass kicked. Just relax team Trump is in charge and you people are stuck on the sidelines in the minority.
 
They are all claiming this is a "REFRENDUM!!!!" on TRRRUMMMMP!!!!

LOL!!!

Anyone remember any of these losers saying anything close to that shit as their pathetic socialist in chief lost over 1000 seats during his divisive presidency?

BTW, while we are on the subject, has there ever been a president more divisive than obama? Can't think of any.

Trump has been more divisive, and no doubt your history isn't very good to not be able to find some that are more.

Me thinks you're a partisan hack.
Trump has not been more divisive. The media has successfully portrayed him as such but that doesn't make it reality.
You’re fucking deranged. :cuckoo:

You can’t get more divisive than threatening to lock up your political opponent.
Retarded statements =/= divisive ya moron.
We all pit right against left. Everyday.

Divisive is when you turn Americans AGAINST each other. That was achieved during the Obama administration as well as somewhat during the Bush administration.

Thing is it's less about the Presidents themselves and more about YOU, the people. You stoke the fires by making wild claims like the ones being made in this thread.

If you want to find deranged, look in the mirror.
 
They are all claiming this is a "REFRENDUM!!!!" on TRRRUMMMMP!!!!

LOL!!!

Anyone remember any of these losers saying anything close to that shit as their pathetic socialist in chief lost over 1000 seats during his divisive presidency?

BTW, while we are on the subject, has there ever been a president more divisive than obama? Can't think of any.

Trump has been more divisive, and no doubt your history isn't very good to not be able to find some that are more.

Me thinks you're a partisan hack.
Trump has not been more divisive. The media has successfully portrayed him as such but that doesn't make it reality.
You’re fucking deranged. :cuckoo:

You can’t get more divisive than threatening to lock up your political opponent.
Retarded statements =/= divisive ya moron.
We all pit right against left. Everyday.

Divisive is when you turn Americans AGAINST each other. That was achieved during the Obama administration as well as somewhat during the Bush administration.

Thing is it's less about the Presidents themselves and more about YOU, the people. You stoke the fires by making wild claims like the ones being made in this thread.

If you want to find deranged, look in the mirror.
Putz, threatening to lock up your political opponents does turn Americans against each other. :eusa_doh:
 
They are all claiming this is a "REFRENDUM!!!!" on TRRRUMMMMP!!!!

LOL!!!

Anyone remember any of these losers saying anything close to that shit as their pathetic socialist in chief lost over 1000 seats during his divisive presidency?

BTW, while we are on the subject, has there ever been a president more divisive than obama? Can't think of any.

Trump has been more divisive, and no doubt your history isn't very good to not be able to find some that are more.

Me thinks you're a partisan hack.
Trump has not been more divisive. The media has successfully portrayed him as such but that doesn't make it reality.
You’re fucking deranged. :cuckoo:

You can’t get more divisive than threatening to lock up your political opponent.
Retarded statements =/= divisive ya moron.
We all pit right against left. Everyday.

Divisive is when you turn Americans AGAINST each other. That was achieved during the Obama administration as well as somewhat during the Bush administration.

Thing is it's less about the Presidents themselves and more about YOU, the people. You stoke the fires by making wild claims like the ones being made in this thread.

If you want to find deranged, look in the mirror.
Putz, threatening to lock up your political opponents does turn Americans against each other. :eusa_doh:
No, it doesn't. It separates the rational Americans from the tards. Anyone with a brain & a bit of common sense recognizes political red meat for the tards for what it is.

Which category do you fall under? You seem a bit emotionally distressed so I'm going to guess tard?
 
Trump has been more divisive, and no doubt your history isn't very good to not be able to find some that are more.

Me thinks you're a partisan hack.
Trump has not been more divisive. The media has successfully portrayed him as such but that doesn't make it reality.
You’re fucking deranged. :cuckoo:

You can’t get more divisive than threatening to lock up your political opponent.
Retarded statements =/= divisive ya moron.
We all pit right against left. Everyday.

Divisive is when you turn Americans AGAINST each other. That was achieved during the Obama administration as well as somewhat during the Bush administration.

Thing is it's less about the Presidents themselves and more about YOU, the people. You stoke the fires by making wild claims like the ones being made in this thread.

If you want to find deranged, look in the mirror.
Putz, threatening to lock up your political opponents does turn Americans against each other. :eusa_doh:
No, it doesn't. It separates the rational Americans from the tards. Anyone with a brain & a bit of common sense recognizes political red meat for the tards for what it is.

Which category do you fall under? You seem a bit emotionally distressed so I'm going to guess tard?
How fortunate am I you’re mentally deranged?
 
Trump has not been more divisive. The media has successfully portrayed him as such but that doesn't make it reality.
You’re fucking deranged. :cuckoo:

You can’t get more divisive than threatening to lock up your political opponent.
Retarded statements =/= divisive ya moron.
We all pit right against left. Everyday.

Divisive is when you turn Americans AGAINST each other. That was achieved during the Obama administration as well as somewhat during the Bush administration.

Thing is it's less about the Presidents themselves and more about YOU, the people. You stoke the fires by making wild claims like the ones being made in this thread.

If you want to find deranged, look in the mirror.
Putz, threatening to lock up your political opponents does turn Americans against each other. :eusa_doh:
No, it doesn't. It separates the rational Americans from the tards. Anyone with a brain & a bit of common sense recognizes political red meat for the tards for what it is.

Which category do you fall under? You seem a bit emotionally distressed so I'm going to guess tard?
How fortunate am I you’re mentally deranged?
Hysterical

I lay out the facts & your response? Personal insults. You know what that shows right?
 
"Dems kicked butt last night; now let’s go defeat the plutocratic Republican tax scam bill and organize, organize, organize in every single zip code" - Crazy Keith Ellison

"I think the bottom line is Donald Trump is not delivering on what he said he was going to deliver on, and that's the problem, And he needs to deliver, and if there's a message for Republicans they better get that message and they better start passing stuff and looking like they can govern." - Crazy Rick Santorum
 
You’re fucking deranged. :cuckoo:

You can’t get more divisive than threatening to lock up your political opponent.
Retarded statements =/= divisive ya moron.
We all pit right against left. Everyday.

Divisive is when you turn Americans AGAINST each other. That was achieved during the Obama administration as well as somewhat during the Bush administration.

Thing is it's less about the Presidents themselves and more about YOU, the people. You stoke the fires by making wild claims like the ones being made in this thread.

If you want to find deranged, look in the mirror.
Putz, threatening to lock up your political opponents does turn Americans against each other. :eusa_doh:
No, it doesn't. It separates the rational Americans from the tards. Anyone with a brain & a bit of common sense recognizes political red meat for the tards for what it is.

Which category do you fall under? You seem a bit emotionally distressed so I'm going to guess tard?
How fortunate am I you’re mentally deranged?
Hysterical

I lay out the facts & your response? Personal insults. You know what that shows right?
LOL

You laid out zero facts. Your denial, that threatening to lock up your political opponent is divisive, is not a fact.

giphy.gif
 
They are all claiming this is a "REFRENDUM!!!!" on TRRRUMMMMP!!!!

LOL!!!

Anyone remember any of these losers saying anything close to that shit as their pathetic socialist in chief lost over 1000 seats during his divisive presidency?

BTW, while we are on the subject, has there ever been a president more divisive than obama? Can't think of any.

Trump has been more divisive, and no doubt your history isn't very good to not be able to find some that are more.

Me thinks you're a partisan hack.

Trump has been more divisive???? You have blinders on. Obama was the first President to talk about "punishing enemies" on the context of an election or "bring guns to knife fights" in the context of debates. You can't get more divisive than Obama.

Right, and giving massive confidence to Confederate Flag waves, annoying black people, making NFL white supporters and black supporters and players hate each other, targeting women, calling all Mexicans rapists, having a go at a judge because he's Hispanic....

The 389 People, Places and Things Donald Trump Has Insulted on Twitter: A Complete List

389 people and places Trump has insulted, war veterans, Republicans, Democrats.

The only reason Obama was divisive was because treason loving confederate flag wavers don't like BLACK PEOPLE being in charge, rather than cleaning their pool.
Black supremacist confirmed....
 
Lots of INCUMBENT REPUBLICANS lost.

Good. Fuck incumbents. Virginia is blue, anyway. It's all controlled by Fairfax County, ESSENTIALLY.
 
has there ever been a president more divisive than obama? Can't think of any.
That you cannot think of any is no surprise insofar as it's not readily apparent that you put much effort of any sort into thinking.

has there ever been a president more divisive than obama? Can't think of any.

As goes the question you posed:
  • One cannot at once claim Obama is the most divisive POTUS ever when the fact is that disdain for him, more that much else, is what unified the GOP enough to garner Trump an election win, and even that was achieved only by the slimmest of margins that result from a consequence of the electoral college and the fact that nearly all states apportion electors using not a proportionality model but rather a "winner take all" model, not by dint of an absolute majority of voters having voted for him.
  • One cannot claim that Obama is the most divisive POTUS ever and expect that claim to be taken as legitimate by any other than inveterate partisans of the GOP. The reason that one cannot expect that is because for such a claim to be credible, one must also make a strong case that were a different Democrat to have won the 2008 and 2012 elections, say HIllary Clinton of whom John McCain in 2013 said, "Her work as secretary of state, with the exception of this issue of Benghazi -- which isn’t going away -- I think has been outstanding," would the divisiveness that suffuses the GOP electorate, thus the nation, be absent or materially diminished? Was the divisiveness attenuated during the presidency of Bill Clinton, the man they voted to impeach, the man they accused of murder, rape and drug-running? Would it have disappeared or abated had Kerry or Sanders become POTUS? I don't know the answers to those questions, but I know one must have sound and cogent answers to them in order for the claim you've made to be credible, and you've presented not merely weak answers to them, but also no answers to those questions.
  • Looking at the discord and disunity within the GOP, both before and after Trump's election, how can Obama have been the cause of that? For instance, whatever divisiveness Obama may have caused is not to blame for the GOP's failure to repeal and replace O-care, a theme GOP federal, state and local candidates ran on for, what, six years.

    Republicans during Obama's tenure hated their own leaders. To wit, they chased John Boehner out of the House, in part due to House Republican's utter refusal to countenance compromise of any sort. Mitch McConnell's approval rating in Kentucky among Republicans is 18%, and even before the Trump era, it hovered in the 15% to 20% range. Is Obama to blame for Republican Kentuckians repeatedly sending to the U.S. Senate a man whom, by and large, they detest? The answer is clearly "no."
  • Imagine the GOP of today as a party not animated by the rhetoric of fear, loathing and antipathy. Quite simply, such a GOP is not imaginable for without those levers, the GOP would not be the GOP we presently see. The talk radio industry, the conservative websites, the faux “Tea Party” pressure groups constantly begging conservatives for donations so they can fend off the pending collapse of Western civilization for one more day -- the entire conservative infrastructure relies on divisiveness as its mother’s milk.

    Indeed, and ironically, the existence and contrivances of the "Tea Party" as a material cohort within the GOP are themselves manifestations of Republican predilection for and predisposition to being more about what they can oppose than what they can accomplish by their own devices; "Tea Party" Republicans are the very architects of discord. "Why" isn't really important because the fact is that they are more focused on sundering things than on creating things, not the least of things being national harmony in general and sound public policy in particular.
The above is just the tip of the iceberg of qualitative analysis of the question with regard to the GOP and the consequences of how it's evolved. There is also the matter of objective analysis of the matter of Obama's alleged-by-Republicans being the most divisive POTUS in history.

Immediately anyone who thinks -- remember I wrote that it's not apparent that you put any effort into doing that -- about the matter recalls that Lincoln's election to the presidency was the main impetus for South Carolina's secession, and we all know where that led. Lincoln's mere assumption of the office catalyzing a state's secession is markedly more divisive than anything Obama did.

One need not, however, constrain the analysis to POTUSes from long ago. The fact of the matter is that according to Gallup's tracking of the extent of polarization among the electorate, Bush II holds that dubious honor, though it's likely that Trump will take it from him. (The Gallup data are for full years.)

ua71zqmcnekxfowsnbfe-q.gif

So to return to my original claim that it's not evident that you bother to think at all, readers who are somewhat aware of the "talking points" the GOP utter will notice that even the notion that Obama be the most divisive president ever isn't a thought you conjured, but rather that you have merely parroted that idea. Furthermore, from reading the above remarks readers will observe that you didn't think to perform so much as even the most cursory investigation to find out whether Obama is, by objective measurement, to say nothing of qualitatively so, the most divisive POTUS ever. In doing those two things, neither of which evinces the barest vestiges of extant thought activity, you've made it patently clear that you are not part of "we the people," but rather that you are a card carrying member of the genre of humanity called "sheeple," the very epitome of insentient humans.
As opposed to the garbage you just parroted...

Trump will NEVER be able to attain the level of divisiveness that Obama showed daily. Trump can never equal Obama’s ignorant statements regarding Trayvon Martin in the middle of mass hysteria and slander from the media. Trump will never be able to claim that a racist killer of cops did not have a known motive. Trump will never be able dismiss an entire region of the state of Pennsylvania as “bitter clingers of guns and bibles”.

It is the Democrats who believe that Obama was a uniter as a partisan effort.
 
Trump has been more divisive???? You have blinders on. Obama was the first President to talk about "punishing enemies" on the context of an election or "bring guns to knife fights" in the context of debates. You can't get more divisive than Obama.

Right, and giving massive confidence to Confederate Flag waves, annoying black people, making NFL white supporters and black supporters and players hate each other, targeting women, calling all Mexicans rapists, having a go at a judge because he's Hispanic....

The 389 People, Places and Things Donald Trump Has Insulted on Twitter: A Complete List

389 people and places Trump has insulted, war veterans, Republicans, Democrats.

The only reason Obama was divisive was because treason loving confederate flag wavers don't like BLACK PEOPLE being in charge, rather than cleaning their pool.

That as a pathetic justification for a President to be divisive. Obama was schooled in divisiveness by and among the best. You people are all over Trump for divisiveness and give Obama a pass.

No, I don't give Obama a pass at all. However I really don't see much of what Obama did to be divisive other than being black and a Democrat.

You think all the shit Trump has been flinging isn't an issue. Well, you're allowed to be wrong.
Yep.....talking about those people with their guns and their religion......that was fake news.

Was he wrong?

No, he wasn't wrong.

It's similar to what happened in the election. Hillary said one thing about Trump supporters, and she suddenly became the worst person on the Earth, but Trump had been insulting people from day one and you people loved it.

This is the problem here, isn't it?

People who don't want to be told the truth, people who hide behind their guns, their religion AND their politics, who cannot accept that they're wrong, don't have the mental capacity to be right, and who will blame others for their problems, and love their "saviors" like Trump who won't do a single thing for these people other than entertain them.
You are too stupid and brainwashed to have a clue about what is “right”.

Turn off the boobtube, dumbass.
 
Trump has been more divisive???? You have blinders on. Obama was the first President to talk about "punishing enemies" on the context of an election or "bring guns to knife fights" in the context of debates. You can't get more divisive than Obama.

Right, and giving massive confidence to Confederate Flag waves, annoying black people, making NFL white supporters and black supporters and players hate each other, targeting women, calling all Mexicans rapists, having a go at a judge because he's Hispanic....

The 389 People, Places and Things Donald Trump Has Insulted on Twitter: A Complete List

389 people and places Trump has insulted, war veterans, Republicans, Democrats.

The only reason Obama was divisive was because treason loving confederate flag wavers don't like BLACK PEOPLE being in charge, rather than cleaning their pool.

That as a pathetic justification for a President to be divisive. Obama was schooled in divisiveness by and among the best. You people are all over Trump for divisiveness and give Obama a pass.

No, I don't give Obama a pass at all. However I really don't see much of what Obama did to be divisive other than being black and a Democrat.

You think all the shit Trump has been flinging isn't an issue. Well, you're allowed to be wrong.

I'm not arguing Trump as a United or not divisive. You say you are not giving Obama a pass yet in the next sentence you say he was not divisive at all and bring his race into it. You people use his race as a retort to the slightest critique of him.

How can I not bring his race into it? People brought his race into it a long time ago, a lot of people hated him for being black. I can't change that, nor will I ignore it.
Far more black supremacists like you voted for Obama BECAUSE he was “black” than the other way around.
 
They are all claiming this is a "REFRENDUM!!!!" on TRRRUMMMMP!!!!

LOL!!!

Anyone remember any of these losers saying anything close to that shit as their pathetic socialist in chief lost over 1000 seats during his divisive presidency?

BTW, while we are on the subject, has there ever been a president more divisive than obama? Can't think of any.

good thing trumptards are too stupid to understand what happened last night.

wackjob
 
They are all claiming this is a "REFRENDUM!!!!" on TRRRUMMMMP!!!!

LOL!!!

Anyone remember any of these losers saying anything close to that shit as their pathetic socialist in chief lost over 1000 seats during his divisive presidency?

BTW, while we are on the subject, has there ever been a president more divisive than obama? Can't think of any.

Trump has been more divisive, and no doubt your history isn't very good to not be able to find some that are more.

Me thinks you're a partisan hack.

Trump has been more divisive???? You have blinders on. Obama was the first President to talk about "punishing enemies" on the context of an election or "bring guns to knife fights" in the context of debates. You can't get more divisive than Obama.

yes, how divisive that white supremacist trumptards hated the black guy in office.

:cuckoo:
 
Right, and giving massive confidence to Confederate Flag waves, annoying black people, making NFL white supporters and black supporters and players hate each other, targeting women, calling all Mexicans rapists, having a go at a judge because he's Hispanic....

The 389 People, Places and Things Donald Trump Has Insulted on Twitter: A Complete List

389 people and places Trump has insulted, war veterans, Republicans, Democrats.

The only reason Obama was divisive was because treason loving confederate flag wavers don't like BLACK PEOPLE being in charge, rather than cleaning their pool.

That as a pathetic justification for a President to be divisive. Obama was schooled in divisiveness by and among the best. You people are all over Trump for divisiveness and give Obama a pass.

No, I don't give Obama a pass at all. However I really don't see much of what Obama did to be divisive other than being black and a Democrat.

You think all the shit Trump has been flinging isn't an issue. Well, you're allowed to be wrong.

I'm not arguing Trump as a United or not divisive. You say you are not giving Obama a pass yet in the next sentence you say he was not divisive at all and bring his race into it. You people use his race as a retort to the slightest critique of him.

How can I not bring his race into it? People brought his race into it a long time ago, a lot of people hated him for being black. I can't change that, nor will I ignore it.
Far more black supremacists like you voted for Obama BECAUSE he was “black” than the other way around.

says a wackjob white supremacist. :cuckoo:
 
They are all claiming this is a "REFRENDUM!!!!" on TRRRUMMMMP!!!!

LOL!!!

Anyone remember any of these losers saying anything close to that shit as their pathetic socialist in chief lost over 1000 seats during his divisive presidency?

BTW, while we are on the subject, has there ever been a president more divisive than obama? Can't think of any.

good thing trumptards are too stupid to understand what happened last night.

wackjob
I haven’t watched the news for months and even I saw those exit polls on CNN at the gym last night.

Over 50% of both New Jersey and Virginia voters last night said that Trump did not affect their vote.

59% of voters in Virginia actually want to keep the confederate statues and most were too stupid to vote for Gillespie.
 
Lots of INCUMBENT REPUBLICANS lost.

Good. Fuck incumbents. Virginia is blue, anyway. It's all controlled by Fairfax County, ESSENTIALLY.
That needs to be fixed.

Virginia was a solid red state the year I was born.

Time to fight demographics changes with demographic changes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top